Your statement is true, except that the majority of the cases of abuse in the Church had to do with priests and pre-teen and teenage boys. It was not pedophilia in the classic sense; it was mostly homosexual in nature.
My point is that molestation of a child whether male or female is the result of attraction to an inappropriate partner who cannot legally give consent. It is not a “classic sense” homosexual problem either. It is pedophilia. Again, why is it so easy to dismiss the alleged 40% of these cases involving girls and make this into a homosexual issue?