Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: tabsternager
Then if you truly believe only God’s revelations (and only those can you find in scripture) then you will cease being a dispensationalist.

What part of my testimony, that I eschew all of the doctrines and traditions of men across the board, did you not understand?

I am a Christian, plain and simple.

130 posted on 11/05/2007 8:03:48 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: Alamo-Girl

I am a Christian, plain and simple.

= = =

BUT, BUT, BUT, sputter . . .

what about the MAGICSTERICALS!!!

AND !!!!TRADITION!!!!

and . . . all the

!!!!SACRED COMMITTEES!!!!

and, and, and . . .

fluster, fluster . . .

all the ecclesiastical bureaucrats! Yeah, what about them! They gotta drive BMW’s too!!!

and, and, and . . .

all the pontificating pontificals splitting hairs!!!!

You’ll force them to go on Shrillery Care!

And, and, and,

when you get to Heaven . . . how will God know what section to put you in????

and, and, and . . .

You sound like you believe that CHRIST’s BLOOD IS SUFFICIENT!

What if THAT leaks out! Why, Christians could be springing up everywhere . . . unCONTROLLED! . . . UNSHAPED, SLICED, DICED AND . . . CONFORMED! OH, THE HORROR OF IT!

HOLY SPIRIT LEFT TO LEAD THEM ON HIS OWN! OH DEAR!!!

WHAT A HERETICKLE!

Just a Christian. Harumph.

Next thing you know, they’ll be trying to REPLACE REPLACEMENTARIANS!

And THEN where would RUBBER BIBLE THEOLOGY MANGLING BE!

HARUMPH!

/s


134 posted on 11/05/2007 8:20:50 AM PST by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

To: Alamo-Girl

“What part of my testimony, that I eschew all of the doctrines and traditions of men across the board, did you not understand?”

My apologies. Your post didn’t seem clear to me. But now that you’ve clarified it, I stand corrected: You’re not a dispensationalist.


143 posted on 11/05/2007 9:10:52 AM PST by tabsternager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

To: Alamo-Girl; tabsternager; Dr. Eckleburg
What part of my testimony, that I eschew all of the doctrines and traditions of men across the board, did you not understand?

You linked several articles here which attempted to authenticate dispensationalism historically.

Why then did you offer links to arguments that are based on a dispensational view of history. If you read these articles carefully, on thing you will discover is that the biases and presuppositions of the author is quite evident in coloring his view of history.

If you " eschew all of the doctrines and traditions of men", what makes you think this guy got it right? Or perhaps you don’t think his assessment of history is right.

In that same post you wrote:

Enoch is an example. It was known to the disciples, quoted in Scripture, beloved for 300 years and then not just rejected but discarded and remained lost until approximately 1775 when surviving manuscripts were discovered in Ethiopia. The true antiquity was confirmed by fragments of copies found in the Dead Sea Scrolls which carbon date to 200 B.C.
What do you believe is the authentic, God-breathed Scripture? IOW, what is your Bible?
144 posted on 11/05/2007 9:27:33 AM PST by topcat54 ("Dispensationalism is a disease ... as contagious as polio.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson