Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Death Knell for the Anglican Communion: ABC Rowan Williams ventures into the closet
TimesOnline ^ | Ruth Gledhill

Posted on 09/18/2007 6:12:26 AM PDT by jacero10

The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, is to hold a secret Communion service for gay clergy and their partners in London.

Dr Williams will celebrate the eucharist at St Peter’s, Eaton Square – the Church of England parish that is known as the spiritual home to some of the country’s most liberal and wealthy Anglican elite. There he will give an address titled “Present realities and future possibilities for lesbians and gay men in the Church”.

The event has been organised under Chatham House rules, which prevent any disclosure of the discussions. The event will take place at 10am on November 29. A list of the names of those who will be present will be seen only by Dr Williams. It will be shredded afterwards.

Among those attending will be the convenor, Chris Newlands, the chaplain to the Bishop of Chelmsford, the Right Rev John Gladwin. Also present will be the Vicar of St Peter’s, the Rev Nicholas Papadopulos, and the former chaplain to the Bishop of Salisbury, the Right Rev David Stancliffe.

(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Mainline Protestant; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: anglican; rowanwilliams; tec
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
This olive branch to the LGBTQ-XYZ community is ill-timed to say the very least. The AC is on the threshold of dissolution with a deadline for TEC compliance set for Sept. 30. Many believe that if TEC is not removed from the Communion after that date, the majority of the communion will break with Canterbury. So reaching out secretly to scheme with LGBTQ community now is a very very bad move for the ABC. He may just lose 50 million out of 70 million Anglicans in a matter of days.
1 posted on 09/18/2007 6:12:27 AM PDT by jacero10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jacero10
Rowan Williams is in a bad position.

The majority of his flock agree with St. Paul's position on the arsenokoitai, but he is answerable to the UK Parliament more than he is answerable to his flock - that's the essence of Erastianism.

2 posted on 09/18/2007 6:17:45 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jacero10

I suppose it’s too much to hope that Her Britannic Majesty in her role as Supreme Governor of the Church of England might step in and insist on the traditional moral teachings of the church being upheld. The British monarch does still claim the title Defensor Fidei (oddly given to Henry VIII by the Pope of Rome for an anti-Lutheran tract he wrote before he decide he needed to adopt the above mentioned title to ensure the availability of easy annulments.)


3 posted on 09/18/2007 6:18:07 AM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jacero10; Simul iustus et peccator; Disgusted in Texas; B Knotts; ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic Ping List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.

4 posted on 09/18/2007 6:49:36 AM PDT by narses (...the spirit of Trent is abroad once more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David
I suppose it’s too much to hope that Her Britannic Majesty in her role as Supreme Governor of the Church of England might step in and insist on the traditional moral teachings of the church being upheld. The British monarch does still claim the title Defensor Fidei (oddly given to Henry VIII by the Pope of Rome for an anti-Lutheran tract he wrote before he decide he needed to adopt the above mentioned title to ensure the availability of easy annulments.)

Great question. I suppose that she wont do anything publicly. Britain is on the verge of constitutional crisis along two axes. Your suggestion would strain both. The Brits love their royals as long as they stay on the celebrity page and off the news. Meanwhile the pressures are mounting for disestablishment of the CofE. Already the new Prime Minister wants nothing to do with bishop appointments. With the state pulling away from the church, it will not be long before the church is extricated from the state as well. So the Queen meddling in church matters is no solution.

Also, the word on the street is that she is not pressing for traditional Christianity but the preservation of the Communion. This is no help as the ABC is increasingly being pressured to choose sides. If he chooses sides, the communion will split. Remaining on the fence will not be an option for long.

5 posted on 09/18/2007 6:53:29 AM PDT by jacero10 (Non nobis domine, sed nomine tuo da gloriam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jacero10

Kinda speaks volumes that this is being done in secret. If homosexuality is really normal and not in conflict with the Bible, why should the Archbishop not be celebrating this in Trafalgar Square? Why the secrecy? Why are the homos tolerating the secrecy?


6 posted on 09/18/2007 7:05:58 AM PDT by Dems_R_Losers (Remember the Pentagon - - www.pentagonmemorial.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jacero10

it’s hard to believe that the ABC would do anything of this nature, especially in secret. I would question the accuracy of the story.


7 posted on 09/18/2007 8:13:38 AM PDT by elpadre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jacero10
With the state pulling away from the church, it will not be long before the church is extricated from the state as well.

Would this be a bad thing?

8 posted on 09/18/2007 8:36:48 AM PDT by Lee N. Field ("Dispensationalism -- threat or menace?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jacero10

A secret Communion service for gay clergy and their partners....at.....St. Peter’s.


9 posted on 09/18/2007 8:38:59 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys: Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat; but they know what's best for us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre
So a Catholic college would have no problem with a convert to Protestantism teaching their own beliefs? Or would that college require that the convert teach something they no longer believe?

Those following things Anglican will recall that the ABC is personally a strong revisionist with several articles with his by-line in favor of gay marriage and the lot of revisionist positions. He will be quite at home at this closeted event.

10 posted on 09/18/2007 9:22:45 AM PDT by jacero10 (Non nobis domine, sed nomine tuo da gloriam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jacero10
it’s hard to believe that the ABC would do anything of this nature, especially in secret. I would question the accuracy of the story.

Those following things Anglican will recall that the ABC is personally a strong revisionist with several articles with his by-line in favor of gay marriage and the lot of revisionist positions. He will be quite at home at this closeted event.

sorry, my cut and paste failed me somehow.

11 posted on 09/18/2007 9:25:32 AM PDT by jacero10 (Non nobis domine, sed nomine tuo da gloriam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lee N. Field
With the state pulling away from the church, it will not be long before the church is extricated from the state as well.

Would this be a bad thing? I dont think it would be bad, but the queen might think so. My point was to explain why I suspect she does not intervene publicly on the conservative side. 1)If she were to intervene it could destabilize the church and monarchy. 2) She would likely intervene on the side of preserving the Communion which is not really an option. The Communion WILL be significantly altered in the near future.

12 posted on 09/18/2007 9:29:54 AM PDT by jacero10 (Non nobis domine, sed nomine tuo da gloriam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

It purportedly was QE2 herself who quashed Jeffrey John’s bid to get a pointy hat in England. Nobody is really sure where she stands in all of this, but Prince Charles did take a pass on ECUSA and attended services at a Presbyterian church on his last visit here.


13 posted on 09/18/2007 1:19:30 PM PDT by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bobjam
Nobody is really sure where she stands in all of this, but Prince Charles did take a pass on ECUSA and attended services at a Presbyterian church on his last visit here.

While Charles is no arbiter of what is good, right or holy, I sympathize with his choice against TEC. Owing to the historic anti-Catholicim of the royals and the British public in general (many have no clue how they feel about Jesus, but they know they hate the pope), his attendance at a Catholic church was sadly out of the question.

14 posted on 09/18/2007 1:24:39 PM PDT by jacero10 (Non nobis domine, sed nomine tuo da gloriam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jacero10

Well, he does turn up at Orthodox churches from time to time (and is a major donor to the Mount Athos Foundation). I guess he was giving a nod to Scotland by going Presbyterian on his last visit here.


15 posted on 09/18/2007 4:41:53 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jacero10

I think the rationale for Charles avoiding any Anglican type church was to not create a scandal and to not insert the Windsors into the problems of the Diocese of Pennsylvania. At least Charles went to church.


16 posted on 09/19/2007 5:01:55 AM PDT by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bobjam

I guess the real question now is which way will ABC Rowan go? Is he a revisionist (personally he is) or an institutionalist (his actions as ABC have been)? If he holds firm with the tradition, he will still have a Communion but he may lose his own CofE.


17 posted on 09/19/2007 5:34:28 AM PDT by jacero10 (Non nobis domine, sed nomine tuo da gloriam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

>>hope that Her Britannic Majesty in her role as Supreme Governor of the Church of England might step in and insist on the traditional moral teachings of the church being upheld.”

She has. It’s her son, Charles that will be the challenge to the communion.


18 posted on 09/19/2007 6:29:11 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jacero10
The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, is to hold a secret Communion service for gay clergy and their partners in London.

That's funny.

"Secret" to men, but not to God. Not that that's important to these functional agnostics. God has long since ceased to play a part in their lives, save for the obligatory lip service.

The Church of England, the British monarchy to which it is inextricably tied and indeed Britain itself, are all headed for the dumpster, I fear.

19 posted on 09/19/2007 7:00:20 AM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Yeah, it is funny. Apparently the “secret” isn’t even hidden from human eyes. Why is such a secret known to this guy over here in Indiana. Since the time and place are known, the attendance list might not long be a secret either. I am hoping that the big secret is that the ABC is going to tell the LGBTQ, etc. crowd that they should find another church. But, I fear this is unlikely. Even if he did, they will never leave. Their staying is a matter of strategy more than faith. They want the wheels of power. And, once the Church’s moral authority is gutted they’ll just go back to the gay bars to pick up a quickie.


20 posted on 09/19/2007 7:08:45 AM PDT by jacero10 (Non nobis domine, sed nomine tuo da gloriam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson