Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Old Is The Orthodox Faith
E-Mail | Unknown | Rev. Dr. Miltiades Efthimiou

Posted on 06/18/2007 12:22:11 PM PDT by TexConfederate1861

If you are a Lutheran, your religion was founded by Martin Luther, an ex-monk of the Catholic Church, in the year 1517.

If you belong to the Church of England, your religion was founded by King Henry VIII in the year 1534 because the Pope would not grant him a divorce with the right to re-marry.

If you are a Presbyterian, your religion was founded by John Knox in Scotland in the year 1560.

If you are a Congregationalist, your religion was originated by Robert Brown in Holland in 1582.

If you are Protestant Episcopalian, your religion was an offshoot of the Church of England, founded by Samuel Senbury in the American colonies in the 17th century.

If you are a Baptist, you owe the tenets of your religion to John Smyth, who launched it in Amsterdam in 1606.

If you are of the Dutch Reformed Church, you recognize Mic helis Jones as founder because he originated your religion in New York in 1628.

If you are a Methodist, your religion was founded by John and Charles Wesley in England in 1774.

If you are a Mormon (Latter Day Saints), Joseph Smith started your religion in Palmyra, New York, in 1829.

If you worship with the Salvation Army, your sect began with William Booth in London in 1865.

If you are Christian Scientist, you look to 1879 as the year in which your religion was born and to Mary Baker Eddy as its founder.

If you belong to one of the religious organizations known as "Church of the Nazarene, Pentecostal Gospel," "Holiness Church," or "Jehovah's Witnesses," your religion is one of the hundreds of new sects founded by men within the past hundred years.

If you are Roman Catholic, your church shared the same rich apostolic and doctrinal heritage as the Orthodox Church for the first thousand years of its history, since during the first millennium they were one and the same Church. Lamentably, in 1054, the Pope of Rome broke away from the other four Apostolic Patriarchates (which include Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch and Jerusalem), by tampering with the Original Creed of the Church, and considering himself to be infallible. Thus your church is 1,000 years old.

If you are Orthodox Christian, your religion was founded in the year 33 by Jesus Christ, the Son of God. It has not changed since that time. Our church is now almost 2,000 years old. And it is for this reason, that Orthodoxy, the Church of the Apostles and the Fathers is considered the true "one Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church."

This is the greatest legacy that we can pass on to the young people of the new millennium.


TOPICS: Catholic; Mainline Protestant; Orthodox Christian
KEYWORDS: orthodox; protestant; romancatholic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-278 next last
To: bremenboy; TexConfederate1861
Why doesn't the Church we can read about in the New Testament resembles the Orthodox Church in its organization and doctrine

The NT establishes all aspects of the Church, including its doctrine. But the NT does not contain all that Christ taught. The Church does, including what's in the scriptures.

41 posted on 06/18/2007 6:18:26 PM PDT by kosta50 (Eastern Orthodoxy is pure Christianity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Invincibly Ignorant

Actually, the Biblical evidence holds up find, only the assertion to the contrary fails.


42 posted on 06/18/2007 6:36:05 PM PDT by FormerLib (Sacrificing our land and our blood cannot buy protection from jihad.-Bishop Artemije of Kosovo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD

Then you should have no deviation from the Church based upon Scripture and Holy Tradition!

Welcome to the Orthodox Christian faith!


43 posted on 06/18/2007 6:37:37 PM PDT by FormerLib (Sacrificing our land and our blood cannot buy protection from jihad.-Bishop Artemije of Kosovo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Invincibly Ignorant
Whoop de do. I believe I said your religion looks nothing like NT writings.

The error in the beliefs of certain individuals is well established, but thanks for the confirmation on your errors.

44 posted on 06/18/2007 6:39:33 PM PDT by FormerLib (Sacrificing our land and our blood cannot buy protection from jihad.-Bishop Artemije of Kosovo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: kosta50
This is further corroborated by Didache (c. 70 AD),

The first occurrence of the Didache was 1873.

45 posted on 06/18/2007 7:00:22 PM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (you shall know that I, YHvH, your Savior, and your Redeemer, am the Elohim of Ya'aqob. Isaiah 60:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Invincibly Ignorant

Since the New Testament was not even put together before 300 AD or so, that isn’t even an issue. My Church existed BEFORE it did.


46 posted on 06/18/2007 7:43:39 PM PDT by TexConfederate1861
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

I doubt that.


47 posted on 06/18/2007 7:44:10 PM PDT by TexConfederate1861
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jude24

The Roman Catholic Church & Mine are the same. And existed from the beginning.


48 posted on 06/18/2007 7:45:37 PM PDT by TexConfederate1861
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Iscool

No. not my Church. THE CHURCH.

You have been reading too much Hal Lindsey.


49 posted on 06/18/2007 7:46:44 PM PDT by TexConfederate1861
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: x

I think we are talking of Christian religon.


50 posted on 06/18/2007 7:47:33 PM PDT by TexConfederate1861
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: kosta50

I stand corrected. I was going from memory. :)


51 posted on 06/18/2007 7:48:49 PM PDT by TexConfederate1861
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: bremenboy

The Church changed somewhat in organization, due to size, etc.


52 posted on 06/18/2007 7:50:16 PM PDT by TexConfederate1861
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt

Not.


53 posted on 06/18/2007 7:51:16 PM PDT by TexConfederate1861
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt

What a load of manure. From a Jewish wanabe.


54 posted on 06/18/2007 7:53:15 PM PDT by TexConfederate1861
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: TexConfederate1861
As a fruit inspector, I see you are not a follower of Yah'shua.

55 posted on 06/18/2007 7:59:08 PM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (you shall know that I, YHvH, your Savior, and your Redeemer, am the Elohim of Ya'aqob. Isaiah 60:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt

My Creed:

We believe in one God the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible.

And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds, God of God, Light of Light, Very God of Very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father by whom all things were made; who for us men, and for our salvation, came down from heaven, and was incarnate by the Holy Spirit of the Virgin Mary, and was made man, and was crucified also for us under Pontius Pilate. He suffered and was buried, and the third day he rose again according to the Scriptures, and ascended into heaven, and sitteth on the right hand of the Father. And he shall come again with glory to judge both the quick and the dead, whose kingdom shall have no end.

And we believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord and Giver of Life, who proceedeth from the Father , who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified, who spoke by the prophets. And we believe one holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. We acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins. And we look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come. Amen.

Any other belief is HERESY.


56 posted on 06/18/2007 8:12:50 PM PDT by TexConfederate1861
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: TexConfederate1861
My Creed:

We believe in one God the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible.

And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten Son of God, begotten of the Father before all worlds, God of God, Light of Light, Very God of Very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father by whom all things were made; who for us men, and for our salvation, came down from heaven, and was incarnate by the Holy Spirit of the Virgin Mary, and was made man, and was crucified also for us under Pontius Pilate. He suffered and was buried, and the third day he rose again according to the Scriptures, and ascended into heaven, and sitteth on the right hand of the Father. And he shall come again with glory to judge both the quick and the dead, whose kingdom shall have no end.

And we believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord and Giver of Life, who proceedeth from the Father , who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified, who spoke by the prophets. And we believe one holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. We acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins. And we look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come. Amen.

Any other belief is HERESY.

56 posted on 06/18/2007 9:12:50 PM MDT by TexConfederate1861

That seems to be man-made tradition from a later time.

I serve, YHvH, the creator of the universe.

I seek salvation from Yah'shua.

I praise His Holy Name.

I read only the Holy Word of Elohim

b'shem Yah'shua
57 posted on 06/18/2007 8:20:15 PM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (you shall know that I, YHvH, your Savior, and your Redeemer, am the Elohim of Ya'aqob. Isaiah 60:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt

Date of the Didache

There are other signs of the text being from the 1st century[9]: the simplicity of the baptismal rite, which is apparently neither preceded by exorcisms nor by formal admission to the catechumenate; the simplicity of the Eucharist, in comparison with the elaborate quasi-Eucharistic prayer in Clement’s Epistle to the Corinthians, chapters 59 - 61; the permission to prophets to extemporize their Eucharistic thanksgiving; the immediate expectation of the second advent. As we find the Christian Sunday already substituted for the Jewish Sabbath as the day of assembly in Acts 20:7 and 1 Corinthians 16:2 and called the Lord’s day (Book of Revelation 1:10), there is no difficulty in supposing that the parallel and consequent shifting of the fasts to Wednesday and Friday may have taken place at an equally early date, at least in some places. But the chief point is the ministry. It is twofold: local and itinerant.
[edit]
Local ministry
The local ministers are bishops and deacons, as in Paul’s epistle Philippians (1:1) and Clement. Presbyters are not mentioned, and the bishops are clearly presbyter-bishops, as in Acts, 20, and in the Pauline Epistles. But when Ignatius wrote in 107, or at the latest 117, the three orders of bishops, priests, and deacons were already considered necessary to the very name of a Church, in Syria, Asia Minor, and Rome. It is probable that in Clement’s time there was as yet no monarchical episcopate at Corinth, though such a state did not endure much past Clement’s time in any of the major Christian centers. On this ground, the Didache is most likely set either in the first century or a rural church. The itinerant ministry is obviously yet more archaic. In the second century prophecy was a charisma only and not a ministry, except among the Montanists.
[edit]
Itinerant ministry
The itinerant ministers are not mentioned by Clement or Ignatius. The three orders are apostles, prophets, and teachers, as in 1 Corinthians 12:28,29: “And in the church God has appointed first of all apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then workers of miracles, also those having gifts of healing, those able to help others, those with gifts of administration, and those speaking in different kinds of tongues. Are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Do all work miracles?” The Didache places teachers below apostles and prophets, the two orders which Paul makes the foundation of the Church (Ephesians 2:20). The term apostle is applied by Paul not only to the Twelve, but also to himself, to Barnabas, to his kinsmen Andronicus and Junia, who had been converted before him, and to a class of preachers of the first rank. There is no instance in the New Testament or in early Christian literature of the existence of an order called apostles later than the Apostolic age. There is no evidence for a second-century order of apostles, which suggests the Didache is earlier, perhaps no later than about 80. Adolf Harnack, on the other hand, gives 131-160, holding that Barnabas and the Didache independently employ a Christianized form of the Jewish Two Ways, while chapter 16 is citing Barnabas — a somewhat roundabout hypothesis. He places Barnabas in 131, and the Didache later than this. Those who date Barnabas under Vespasian mostly make the Didache the borrower in chapters 1 - 5 and in 16. Many, with Funk, place Barnabas under Nerva. The more common view is that which puts the Didache before 100. Bartlet agrees with Ehrhard that 80-90 is the most probable decade. Sabatier, Minasi, Jacquier, and others have preferred a date even before 70. Owen Chadwick wryly dates the Didache to “the period between about 70 and 110. It may be odd there, but it is much odder anywhere else.” The earliest suggested dating is 44 or 47.[10]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Didache


58 posted on 06/18/2007 8:24:28 PM PDT by kawaii (Orthodox Christianity -- Proclaiming the Truth Since 33 A.D.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt

i sometimes wonder who’s worse; the Muslim’s who’ve only seen the revelation of Satan or the folks who saw Christ and continue to deny him...


59 posted on 06/18/2007 8:26:10 PM PDT by kawaii (Orthodox Christianity -- Proclaiming the Truth Since 33 A.D.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt

Jesus said unto Peter; “You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my Church”

So Peter was the first Bishop of Antioch, where they were first called Christians.

So I guess one could say that the Christian Church started at that time. And that the bishop of Antioch is the true successor of Peter, not the bishop of Rome.


60 posted on 06/18/2007 8:36:00 PM PDT by frtom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-278 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson