Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: RobbyS
No one has ever said that Luther was a metaphysician.

Jumping in where angels wisely fear to tread: Luther said -- PLEASE don't ask me to look it up, I think that paper back fell apart about a decade ago -- that Aquinas misunderstood Aristotle. As far as I'm concerned anybody who says that is claiming to be a metaphysician, whether I agree with him or not.

(Are metaphysicians in my insurance-approved health provider group?)

159 posted on 06/11/2007 9:23:11 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawg
What I said was that no one has said the Luther was reliable as a philosopher. As far as St. Thomas is concerned, Luther was hardly an expert. Remember that Cajetan, his first real interlocutor, was the leading Thomist of the age, and from what I have read, he said that Luther just didn’t “get it.” Luther’s strength was in rhetoric, not philosophy. As a rhetorian he was the equal of Cicero.
184 posted on 06/11/2007 1:09:37 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHOa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson