Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Head Coverings for Women (in the Catholic Church)
Zenit News Agency ^ | May 22, 2007 | Father Edward McNamara

Posted on 05/22/2007 6:24:41 PM PDT by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-154 next last
To: livius
My grandmother called her hat lady her "modiste".

I still have her hats. I'll have to have the right suit to wear with each one of them.

IF I lose another 20 pounds I will be able to fit into her black wool Chanel suit -- it has an adorable little hat that goes with it - a tiny black wool triangle with a little cloud of netting and a few jet spangles. It's cute.

81 posted on 05/23/2007 4:05:41 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother ((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret

Thank you! Good responses both.


82 posted on 05/23/2007 4:06:29 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother ((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret; livius
I think it was Miss Manners who said it was o.k. to wear a hat to church if it said, "It is a beautiful day, God made me, and I am glad to be alive."

It is NOT o.k. to wear a hat to church that says, "Well, HelLO there!"

83 posted on 05/23/2007 4:18:26 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother ((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: kawaii

I’m glad I’m not Orthodox.

When I was a girl, I had to cover my head in church and it felt demeaning. It made it seem as though there was something shameful about women that mandated our covering our heads. If other women want to cover their heads in church, that’s fine. But I’ll never wear a hat or veil in church again.


84 posted on 05/23/2007 4:37:41 PM PDT by steadfastconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

By the time that the new Code of Canon Law was issued in 1983, women covering their heads in public was no longer the cultural norm in Western countries. The Church’s decision to omit this requirement from the CCL was certainly not done to shock or offend anyone. Moreover, the Church has the authority to change rules such as this, especially since this particular requirement was not something essential to the nature of the liturgy. Times change. Get over it.


85 posted on 05/23/2007 4:45:43 PM PDT by steadfastconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: nanetteclaret

So if a woman does not cover her head in Church, she is not acknowledging that Christ is present or she is disobeying His Mother?

Please, if you want to wear a hat, mantilla, or veil, go right ahead. But don’t try to elevate yourself over those who don’t.


86 posted on 05/23/2007 4:48:24 PM PDT by steadfastconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

Ah, Chanel! And I did love those little tiny hats with the veils. I always dreamed of wearing those things, but unfortunately, by the time I got old enough to wear them, everybody else had dumped them and was wearing coveralls, sandals, and no bra. Such is life.


87 posted on 05/23/2007 4:51:18 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: steadfastconservative

I don’t find it demeaning, but I do think it’s odd when people obsess on it, and that was one of the things I never liked about some of the Tridentine folks. Sometimes you’d think the main point of the liturgy was getting women to cover their heads.

It’s no longer something that people do in our society - of course, someday, it may again be common, who knows? - and wearing or not wearing a hat really doesn’t say a thing about one’s piety or faith. So unless the Muslims take over and force us all to wear garbage bags, I think it will remain optional for Christians.


88 posted on 05/23/2007 4:55:33 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: steadfastconservative

which puts your at odds with Holy Scripture:

1Cr 11:3 But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman [is] the man; and the head of Christ [is] God.

1Cr 11:4 Every man praying or prophesying, having [his] head covered, dishonoureth his head.

1Cr 11:5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with [her] head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.

1Cr 11:6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.

1Cr 11:7 For a man indeed ought not to cover [his] head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man.

1Cr 11:8 For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man.

1Cr 11:9 Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.

1Cr 11:10 For this cause ought the woman to have power on [her] head because of the angels.

1Cr 11:11 Nevertheless neither is the man without the woman, neither the woman without the man, in the Lord.

1Cr 11:12 For as the woman [is] of the man, even so [is] the man also by the woman; but all things of God.

1Cr 11:13 Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered?


89 posted on 05/23/2007 5:17:17 PM PDT by kawaii (Orthodox Christianity -- Proclaiming the Truth Since 33 A.D.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: tob2

I’m pretty sure I was a Catholic that was accidentally born into a Lutheran family, LOL!


90 posted on 05/23/2007 6:05:11 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: steadfastconservative
Yes, but the decision of women not to wear hats ought not to have affected what was proper dress at mass. A scarf was an easy enough garment to carry a purse. The mind-set of the reformers was to end almost all formality in Catholic worship and zealously conform to current customs in thought and behavior. I’m exaggerating, but as one who welcomed the first reformers I did not at first realize the iconoclastic and rebellious spirit at work among the lower clergy.
91 posted on 05/23/2007 6:08:14 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: steadfastconservative
Nonsense. It's only demeaning if you let it be so.

And somebody else explaining why they cover their head is not attacking you . . . unless, again, you let it be so. Covering the head is a traditional sign of respect, not a sign of the subjugation of women, and adhering to an ancient custom is not saying that those who don't are disrespectful of Christ. Do as you like, but don't accuse others of attacking you when they've done no such thing.

I think your violent reaction ("something shameful about women" - "never wear a hat or veil in church again") has more to do with your personal feelings, maybe with your personal experience, than with the Church.

92 posted on 05/23/2007 6:09:25 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother ((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: livius
I wore them anyway (had them altered as a 20-something) . . . until two children and the corresponding avoirdupois that comes with another 30 years made it impossible . . . . I was thought eccentric but harmless.

My grandmother was a little tiny person - I take after my dad's side of the family.

93 posted on 05/23/2007 6:11:25 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother ((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Frank Sheed; Tax-chick
Frank,

For $10, you've got to check this out.

94 posted on 05/23/2007 6:18:28 PM PDT by HoosierHawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: HoosierHawk

That’s the one we have.


95 posted on 05/23/2007 6:33:05 PM PDT by Tax-chick (We all thread in this earth swathe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

Yes, it was Miss Manners.

I think my hat says, “I bought this hat in 1999.” I’m thinking of asking my mother for a new hat for my birthday!


96 posted on 05/23/2007 6:34:51 PM PDT by Tax-chick (We all thread in this earth swathe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
I bought it about 3 weeks ago.

Amazon.com is the place to go for CDs and DVDs.

(Unless I stumble across it in the $4.99 bin at WalMart.)

97 posted on 05/23/2007 6:38:18 PM PDT by HoosierHawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

It’s better than, “My grandmother bought this hat in 1953!”


98 posted on 05/23/2007 6:41:51 PM PDT by AnAmericanMother ((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: HoosierHawk

My husband does the same thing.

I check movies out of the library :=).


99 posted on 05/23/2007 6:42:10 PM PDT by Tax-chick (We all thread in this earth swathe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

Oh, I don’t know. Sounds like your grandmother had better taste (and more money) in 1953 than I’ll ever have.


100 posted on 05/23/2007 6:42:58 PM PDT by Tax-chick (We all thread in this earth swathe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson