To: Dr. Eckleburg; Gamecock; ksen
IMO it's flawed to the core.
I just re-took the test, and answered "agree" to everything. My guess is that each agree/disagree answer must correspond to a pair of opposing theologians. Question 1 covers Friedrich Schleiermacher, Question 2 covers Anselm, Question 3 covers Jonathan Edwards, etc. My answering "agree" to all led me to a tiebreaker question, to which I gave the "sovereignty is supremely important" answer. Note my scores, and who I'm supposedly in agreement with:
 |
You scored as John Calvin. Much of what is now called Calvinism had more to do with his followers than Calvin himself, and so you may or may not be committed to TULIP, though God's sovereignty is all important.
|
Anselm |
|
100% |
|
John Calvin |
|
100% |
|
Martin Luther |
|
100% |
|
Paul Tillich |
|
100% |
|
Jürgen Moltmann |
|
100% |
|
Jonathan Edwards |
|
100% |
|
Charles Finney |
|
100% |
|
Friedrich Schleiermacher |
|
100% |
|
Karl Barth |
|
100% |
|
Augustine |
|
100% |
|
Which theologian are you?created with QuizFarm.com68 posted on
05/21/2007 12:26:10 PM PDT by
Alex Murphy
(FR Member Alex Murphy: Declared Anathema By The Council Of Trent)
To: Alex Murphy; Gamecock; HarleyD; irishtenor; ksen; Frumanchu; P-Marlowe; alpha-8-25-02; ...
LOLOLOL. That's hilarious!
"What do you mean I don't have any feelings?!? I'm an actress! I have ALL the feelings!!!" -- Goldie Hawn in "First Wives Club."
79 posted on
05/21/2007 12:47:24 PM PDT by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
To: Alex Murphy
Not answering the questions honestly or consistently invalidates the results. This is why many personality “tests” ask several questions in different ways. In more detailed tests, the results address the inconsistecies.
Therefore, the result you obtained by agreeing to every question mean nothing. It would be interesting to see what happens if you disagree with every question.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson