Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How to Read the New Testament
Townhall ^ | 5/21/2007 | Mike S. Adams

Posted on 05/21/2007 1:31:42 AM PDT by bruinbirdman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420421-435 next last
To: aMorePerfectUnion

It says 1) Christ was promised the throne of David, 2) Christ is physically reigning, and 3) Christ sat down on a throne given to Him. Now if He is currently sitting down on a throne that God has given Him, what throne is this?


401 posted on 05/27/2007 1:26:26 PM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
I doubt if He's hold up in some Orlando timeshare.

ROTFLOL!!!

Christ is everywhere and over all things, so He could well be sitting on Seinfeld's parent's uncomfortable pull-out sofa as we speak in addition to most definitely sitting on the throne of David from where He rules with might and purpose.

"In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace;

Wherein he hath abounded toward us in all wisdom and prudence;

Having made known unto us the mystery of his will, according to his good pleasure which he hath purposed in himself:

That in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth; even in him:

In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will:

That we should be to the praise of his glory, who first trusted in Christ." -- Ephesians 1:7-12

Sounds to me like His gathering "together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth; even in him" is current and ongoing, as God wills.

402 posted on 05/27/2007 1:36:08 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; TomSmedley; 1000 silverlings; Lee N. Field; topcat54; ears_to_hear; Frumanchu; ...
"I already answered the question, PM. You just don't like the answer. It's always going to be the same answer."

Dr. E, I was asking the question because your answer was not clear. It is still not clear




"
From the moment of His resurrection, Christ has been gathering the elect from all races and nations and bringing them home while subduing Satan and his minions which certainly included Nero."

Here's how Paul describes the death of the Antichrist...

"Then that lawless o­ne will be revealed whom the Lord will slay with the breath of His mouth and bring to an end by the appearance of His coming;"


This is how Nero died...

According to Suetonius, Nero fled to Via Salaria, a suburb of Rome with his remaining friends. They urged him to flee, but he prepared himself for suicide. Reportedly, the praetorian guard entered to capture Nero just as he stabbed himself with the help of his secretary, Epaphroditus. Upon seeing the figure of a Roman soldier, he gasped "this is fidelity."It was said by Cassius Dio that he uttered the last words "Jupiter, what an artist perishes in me!"

Do you see any connection there? I certainly do not. Jesus kills, brings the Antichrist to an end, at the brightness of his coming (Parousia).

Nero comitted suicide.




 "Satan is currently being subdued under Christ. Amazing that people would actually prefer to believe otherwise. What greater assistance does Satan need if Christians believe he is in control?"

What does this have to do with the issue at hand???

Is Satan defeated? Yes.
Is he powerless and can be safely ignored? o­nly at your extreme peril.
"Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour:"



Nero, Caligula, Ivan the Terrible, Stalin, every evil despot of every evil empire, including Hillary Clinton, is and was under the control of God who puts these reprobates into the paths of His flock for His own perfect purpose, not the least of which is so that we may know conclusively that with Christ we will triumph.

I agree totally. But the Bible states that Jesus will destroy the Antichrist at his Parousia.

Jesus Parousia has not yet occured.

Nero is long dead.

Therefore Nero is not the Antichrist refered to in II Thes.



"Sadly, the dispensationalist doesn't seem to really believe Him."


Why do you say this?




403 posted on 05/27/2007 2:24:34 PM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; HarleyD
Frankly, I've never spoken to another Christian in real life (other than this internet forum) who actually believes Christ does not reign today from heaven.

You need to get out more and hang around those who actually believe the scriptures ---

Thankfully, dispensationalism is a minority opinion in Christianity and, God willing, it, too, shall pass.

Not until heaven and earth passes away [the dispensational one not the preterist].

404 posted on 05/27/2007 2:30:40 PM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD; Uncle Chip; Dr. Eckleburg; TomSmedley; PetroniusMaximus; xzins
“I’m with Dr. E; I have never heard any Christian say that Christ was not reigning. And, according to the above verses, Christ has been given a throne already. If you believe in a physical resurrection, then Christ must be physically reigning. If He is physically reigning, He has been given a throne. If He’s been given a throne, He’s reigning from the throne of David.”

HarleyD, I believe you are failing to distinguish between the Heavenly (but real) throne and the earthly throne.

Please consider the following...

“And Jesus said unto them, Verily I say unto you, That ye which have followed me, in the regeneration when the Son of man shall sit in the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel” - Matthew 19

Please note the following:

1. The time referred to is after the 2nd coming, after the general resurrection
2. Future tense “shall sit in the throne of his glory”. The clear implication is that there is some future throne waiting Jesus.

Jesus already reigns with all power is heaven - but at some point in the future, after the 2nd coming he will sit down on an earthly throne in Jerusalem and, with the 12 disciples, rule over the 12 tribes of Israel.

405 posted on 05/27/2007 2:41:55 PM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD; Dr. Eckleburg
I'm not sure what Dr. E has provided but Christ was given the throne of David.

Act 2:30-33 Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, He would raise up Christ to sit upon his [sic:David's] throne, seeing this beforehand, he spoke of the resurrection of Christ, that His soul was not left in Hades, nor would His flesh see corruption, God raised up this Jesus, of which we all are witnesses. Therefore being exalted to the right of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, He has poured out this which you now see and hear.

Where does it say that Jesus is currently sitting on the Throne of David??? He is currently sitting on the right hand of his Father not on David's Throne, right, until His Father makes His enemies His footstool???

I'm with Dr. E; I have never heard any Christian say that Christ was not reigning. And, according to the above verses, Christ has been given a throne already.

If that's so, then why is He still sitting on the right side of His Father's throne, not His throne or David's Throne???

If you believe in a physical resurrection, then Christ must be physically reigning.

I'm sorry, did I miss the resurrection. We must all have missed it. Or is it still future for us all who believe. And then after a physical resurrection then a physical reign from the city of David aka Jerusalem.

If He is physically reigning, He has been given a throne.

Well, that settles it: He is not physically reigning because He is not here on earth yet, right? He is still in heaven, and He is still not sitting on the Throne of David

If He's been given a throne, He's reigning from the throne of David.

Then it mustn't have been given to Him yet, right, because He is still sitting next to His Father.

406 posted on 05/27/2007 2:59:39 PM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD

HD,
It says Christ was promised the throne. It says Christ
was raised from the dead. From there, everything else you
said is not in the text.

best,
ampu


407 posted on 05/27/2007 3:19:39 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (-Taken -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

It all makes sense to me now! Thank you for showing where
you stand in all this.

Dr. Gary North, Reconstructionist, who wants to literally,
publically STONE blasphemers, heretics, apostate Christians, people who cursed or struck their parents, females guilty of “unchastity before marriage,” “incorrigible” juvenile delinquents, adulterers, murderers and those guilty of raping married women or betrothed virgins.

Are there that many stones available in America?

This, is the balanced view of scripture you are putting
forth to show how unbalanced Dispensationalists are??? And
Dr. Gary North is your theologian, who represents your views
of scripture? Give me someone who loves God, understands
grace and has trusted Christ - yet takes God’s word as true -
any day over that.

Would your group dedicate a television
station to provide live coverage of these public stonings
like the kind that occurred in Afghanistan in the soccer
stadium back before the liberation?

My gosh! That makes Pat Robertson look mainstream!

No need to respond. I get it now. Just tell me you’ve
trusted Christ for your salvation and with that I’ll gladly
wish you blessings in your life - which apparently and sadly
will be lived under slavery to the Law.

Yikes.

ampu


408 posted on 05/27/2007 3:31:28 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (-Taken -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip; Dr. Eckleburg

when only FACTS are listed, preterism loses hands down.

preterism is built on an extremely shaky foundation of conjecture and opinion.


409 posted on 05/27/2007 7:21:30 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

“RAPTURE FEVER
WHY DISPENSATIONALISM IS PARALYZED
by Gary North”

All kidding aside, watch out for Gary North. He’s come out with some fairly crazy stuff in the past. He was a BIG hyper of Y2K. I believe he was involved in several misinformed ventures before that.


410 posted on 05/27/2007 7:50:58 PM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 396 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus
Read the book.

North warned about computer troubles before 2000. Other than that, there have been no "misinformed ventures."

One of the greatest books ever written was North's...

POLITICAL POLYTHEISM
The Myth of Plurality

Free, online. Every conservative Christian should read that book.

411 posted on 05/27/2007 8:05:34 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

Other than that, there have been no “misinformed ventures.”

Trying to make America a Theocracy and imposing the OT Law on believers is a misinformed venture.


412 posted on 05/27/2007 9:16:28 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (-Taken -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

“So, of course I want to see y2k bring down the system, all over the world.
I have hoped for this all of my adult life.” — Gary North


413 posted on 05/27/2007 9:20:09 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (-Taken -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus; Uncle Chip; Dr. Eckleburg; TomSmedley; xzins
HarleyD, I believe you are failing to distinguish between the Heavenly (but real) throne and the earthly throne.

I think that is a fair point and an interesting observation. Are there two thrones; one in heaven and one on earth? I would tend to say no and I would point to this verse (among others).

Our Lord seems to indicate there is one throne, in heaven, and earth is the footstool of this throne. Now I can't explain the physical conditions of this throne but the throne seems to start in heaven and end on earth.

This touches on something that I, quite frankly, have never figured out-the physical and the spiritual. Satan is a physical being roaming around like a lion, but we don't see him. Likewise we know angels are everywhere. Indeed, we are told in scripture that we might treat them "unaware". Yet we would call them spiritual beings. There is no indication that the garden of Eden was ever destroyed, and every indication that it still exist guarded by angels, but where is it? We even know the general whereabouts but can any of us find it?

I bring this up because I don't think one can clearly distinguish from the "spiritual" and "physical". They appear to be intertwine like different spectrum of light. A slight shift in the wave pattern and one has a completely different perspective.

Just because we cannot see a physical throne going from heaven to earth does not mean that a physical throne doesn't exist. Christ was physical but upon His resurrection would appear and disappear. (I might add He did this before His death as well.) How we will be in our glorified bodies is difficult to understand. Somehow we view ourselves as we are now, walking around on some celestrial cloud. I'm not sure if that's the right perspective.

A physical throne reaching from heaven to earth right now doesn't seem to be all that preposterous when we can't even find Eden located on the Tigris and Euphrates.

414 posted on 05/27/2007 11:35:12 PM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion
It says Christ was promised the throne. It says Christ was raised from the dead. From there, everything else you said is not in the text.

1) Christ was promised the throne of David,- Luk 1:32 He shall be great and shall be called the Son of the Highest. And the Lord God shall give Him the throne of His father David.

2) Christ is physically reigning,- Act 1:9 And saying these things, as they watched, He was taken up. And a cloud received Him out of their sight.

3) Christ sat down on a throne given to Him. - Heb 1:3 who being the shining splendor of His glory, and the express image of His essence, and upholding all things by the word of His power, through Himself cleansing of our sins, He sat down on the right of the Majesty on high,

415 posted on 05/27/2007 11:45:08 PM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD; Dr. Eckleburg; aMorePerfectUnion; PetroniusMaximus
Mat 5:34-35 But I say to you, Do not swear at all! Not by Heaven, because it is God's throne; not by the earth, for it is the footstool of His feet; not by Jerusalem, because it is the city of the great King

Thank you for the scripture --- it one more time refutes the preterist position. Read it carefully. It says that heaven is God's [the Father's] throne and Jerusalem is the city of the great King.

Bingo ----

"At that time they shall call Jerusalem the throne of the Lord, and all nations shall be gathered unto it, to the name of the Lord, to Jerusalem, neither shall they walk any more after the imagination of their evil heart."[Jeremiah 3:18]

416 posted on 05/28/2007 3:16:39 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip; Dr. Eckleburg; aMorePerfectUnion; PetroniusMaximus
Bingo ----

??? Did I miss something???

I assume you are equating the Jews with Jerusalem and somehow are trying to suggest that God loves the rebellious Jews? That is not what the text states.

417 posted on 05/28/2007 5:59:43 AM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD
??? Did I miss something???

Yes --- the entire text above --- it's right there. It says that "Jerusalem is the city of the great King". Who is the great King? and what is His city? and where will His throne be?

I assume you are equating the Jews with Jerusalem and somehow are trying to suggest that God loves the rebellious Jews?

Are you suggesting that He doesn't???Are you saying that God is incapable of "having mercy on whom He chooses to have mercy"??? Are rebellious Jews or anybody beyond the grace of God??? Since when???

You guys are too much with your double standards and are in for a rude awakening.

418 posted on 05/28/2007 7:30:23 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 417 | View Replies]

To: HarleyD

“2) Christ is physically reigning,- Act 1:9 And saying these things, as they watched, He was taken up. And a cloud received Him out of their sight.

3) Christ sat down on a throne given to Him. - Heb 1:3 who being the shining splendor of His glory, and the express image of His essence, and upholding all things by the word of His power, through Himself cleansing of our sins, He sat down on the right of the Majesty on high,
HD,
I grant you that the scriptures say Christ was promised
to reign on the throne of David (your #1)

As to #’s 2 & 3...

#2 - Your verse says Christ was caught up in the clouds. It
doesn’t say He is physically reigning.

#3 - It says He sat down. It doesn’t say He is reigning on
the throne of David.

You have made two large assumptions.

ampu


419 posted on 05/28/2007 7:51:59 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (-Taken -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies]

To: PetroniusMaximus; Dr. Eckleburg; TomSmedley; 1000 silverlings; Lee N. Field; ears_to_hear; ...
"Then that lawless one will be revealed whom the Lord will slay with the breath of His mouth and bring to an end by the appearance of His coming;"

This is not a case of cosmic halitosis.

The Bible tells us what it means.

“He had in His right hand seven stars, out of His mouth went a sharp two-edged sword, and His countenance was like the sun shining in its strength.” (Rev. 1:16)

“Repent, or else I will come to you quickly and will fight against them with the sword of My mouth.” (Rev. 2:16)

“Now out of His mouth goes a sharp sword, that with it He should strike the nations. And He Himself will rule them with a rod of iron. He Himself treads the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.” (Rev. 19:15)

“For the word of God is living and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the division of soul and spirit, and of joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.” (Heb. 4:12)

Christ conquers by means of the Word of God. That is the testimony of Scripture. The “lawless one” is defeated by the same means, the testimony of the Word of God.

420 posted on 05/28/2007 9:40:17 AM PDT by topcat54 ("... knowing that the testing of your faith produces patience." (James 1:3))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420421-435 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson