Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Kolokotronis; Blogger; wmfights
it is a recording of what someone believed were the beliefs of early Christians about Mary. Its a very early work, though clearly composed after she died. To the best of my knowledge, Orthodoxy has no dogmas as such which find their [origin] in the story, but there is theologoumenna which find their source there.

Exactly so, and this is my attitude about it as well. I quoted it in response to Blogger's question, why anyone would marry a girl he did not intend to have sex with. I was fully aware that the next thing Blogger would do is forget his own question and thump the table with allegations of forgery.

2,895 posted on 12/23/2006 8:43:19 PM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2867 | View Replies ]


To: annalex

I wasn't the first one who used the term forgery. I don't believe it is Scriptural.

As far as it being a recording of what someone believed were the beliefs of early Christians, the Muslims believe that we believe that Mary is a member of the Trinity (I can't remember which one falls off, Son or Holy Spirit). Again, this is not evidence that this is an early Christian belief. Adopted later? Yes. But there is no evidence the earliest believers thought about Mary in this manner.


2,906 posted on 12/23/2006 9:43:13 PM PST by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2895 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson