Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry
Those who confess their beliefs on threads of any type are also likely to confess their beliefs in the ballot box or the town square. They belong on Free Republic.

Nevertheless, your idea for avoiding crevo flame wars is among many which have been considered - and will continue to be discussed - among the moderators.

544 posted on 09/20/2006 7:22:31 AM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 541 | View Replies ]


To: Religion Moderator
Those who confess their beliefs on threads of any type are also likely to confess their beliefs in the ballot box or the town square. They belong on Free Republic.

Agreed! But it's not difficult to distinguish between the mere profession of faith, to which no one objects, and the obvious disruption of a discussion which was not intended for the religion forum.

Nevertheless, your idea for avoiding crevo flame wars is among many which have been considered - and will continue to be discussed - among the moderators.

I'm delighted that this is under consideration. Please trust me in this -- because I know the crevo threads very well -- it would be an enormous help. There are fewer than a dozen disruptive regulars. They don't discuss science. Well, they discuss it by routinely declaring that it's all fraud, that it leads to Hitler, to homosexuality, etc. Very easy to spot. A few well-placed "Stay off this thread!" posts from the mods would be a blessing!

548 posted on 09/20/2006 7:33:45 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Science-denial is not conservative. It's reality-denial and it's unhealthy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 544 | View Replies ]

To: Religion Moderator; Admin Moderator
Thanks for your involvement. I would first suggest that there is no such thing as 'science' threads. Posts which discuss science typically have been posted in News/Activism. If people who have different opinions than original posters are going to be required to stay off certain posts within News/Activism, then that topic should be broken out from News/Activism in the same way General Chat or Religion is.

Establish a science category, and much of this repetitive nonsense from both sides will fade away.

If discussions of science are within the category of News/Activism, then where would a post regarding Christianity versus Islam and how it is impacting politics and war be categorized? In religion or News/Activism?

All logic points to isolating these discussions the same way blogs and personal and chat and religion has been. This topic is too devisive and is not pertinent nor even connected to conservatives winning and maintaining The House, The Senate, The WOT, Iraq, defeating liberalism, lowering taxes, reducing government, etc., all of which are the primary conservative activism issues.

The definition of insanity is trying to do the same thing over and over again and expect different results. That is what we have been doing here for 7+ years on this issue, and I believe it is time for a change.

554 posted on 09/20/2006 8:48:52 AM PDT by NewLand (Always Remember September 11, 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 544 | View Replies ]

To: Religion Moderator; NewLand
If evo threads are consigned to a science forum, that wouldn't eliminated the heated discussion. If discussion on the evo threads were limited to science, these posts would eventually dwindle in number because there isn't that much hard scientific evidence for evolution -- just a lot of speculation and philosophically-based interpretation of evidence. Why not place the evo discussion threads under a new forum, called "Alchemy"?
693 posted on 09/20/2006 2:43:02 PM PDT by My2Cents (A pirate's life for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 544 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson