[Virginia-American]

- All the fossil records show species coming in to being with NO transitions. There are NO froggits- NO "proof" that two frogs gave birth to a part frog part rabbit...OR ANY OTHER SPECIES TRANSMUTATING! Every species appears fully as what it is, NOT in some transitional phase.

Not so. You're just ignoring the reptile-to-mammal sequence, and the eohippus-to-horse sequence, both of which are quite smooth. And there are a lot more than those.

Who would expect a part-frog and part-rabbit? Certainly no biologist! In fact, the absence of fossils of that sort is yet more evidence of standard biology, since the ToE says there shouldn't be any such thing. And, of course, the discovery of fossils like Tiktaalik, which was found by using the ToE, is even more evidence that Darwin was basically right.

Using creationism or ID, has anyone ever predicted the existence of a fossil? No! Until creationism or ID can do so, they're not nearly as useful as normal science

Using ID or creationism, has anyone ever predicted a DNA sequence? No!

[Elsie]

You're just ignoring the reptile-to-mammal sequence, and the eohippus-to-horse sequence, both of which are quite smooth.

Alas; I fail to understand.

[Elsie]

Who would expect a part-frog and part-rabbit?

A frog with fur would be a good starting point....

---

On a similar vein: "No one expects the Inquisition."