[unspun]

You have provided no evidence to show that the documentation is of "straws". An examination of your posting history shows that you have made inaccurate statements on this subject in the past, and that you provide no substantitative responses when your errors are corrected.

My responses have been to show how Evolution is just what it is: too lacking in testability, testing, and test results, to be called scientific theory. Also, to point out how human beings (and animals) have abilities that are simply not addressable by the vain materialist philosophy at the heart of Darwinism.

Go ahead with your pseudo-science, if you must. That is not my turf.

[unspun]

Once again, the burden of proof belongs with those who posit their hypotheses, not with those who point out the standards such dealers of hypothetics fail to attain.

[Jaguarbhzrd]

My responses have been to show how Evolution is just what it is: too lacking in testability, testing, and test results, to be called scientific theory. Also, to point out how human beings (and animals) have abilities that are simply not addressable by the vain materialist philosophy at the heart of Darwinism. Prove that, and you could be the next nobel prize winner. The problem is that the whole statement is nonsense, and you would be laughed out of any scientific conference.