[Jaguarbhzrd]

My responses have been to show how Evolution is just what it is: too lacking in testability, testing, and test results, to be called scientific theory. Also, to point out how human beings (and animals) have abilities that are simply not addressable by the vain materialist philosophy at the heart of Darwinism. Prove that, and you could be the next nobel prize winner. The problem is that the whole statement is nonsense, and you would be laughed out of any scientific conference.

[Jaguarbhzrd]

Argh, this html thing is tricky.

[Religion Moderator]

Be careful to keep the discussion on the issues and not make it personal.

[unspun]

My responses have been to show how Evolution is just what it is: too lacking in testability, testing, and test results, to be called scientific theory. Also, to point out how human beings (and animals) have abilities that are simply not addressable by the vain materialist philosophy at the heart of Darwinism.

Prove that, and you could be the next nobel prize winner. The problem is that the whole statement is nonsense, and you would be laughed out of any scientific conference.

Once again, the "burden of proof" is with those who would propound the "theory," not with those who point out the standards which are not being met. Once again, I leave dealings with documentation that is not science but is presented as science (i.e., pseudo-science) to "you" (i.e., the Darwinist). And as I leave, I bid you newfound intellectual peace.