[Dimensio]

Documentation of whatever straws may be grasped which seem to support Evolution is not, as I think you know, documentation of the testing required by the scientific process. Even more to the point of qualifying as a scientific theory, the theory has to be testable in the first place.

You have provided no evidence to show that the documentation is of "straws". An examination of your posting history shows that you have made inaccurate statements on this subject in the past, and that you provide no substantitative responses when your errors are corrected.

[unspun]

You have provided no evidence to show that the documentation is of "straws". An examination of your posting history shows that you have made inaccurate statements on this subject in the past, and that you provide no substantitative responses when your errors are corrected.

My responses have been to show how Evolution is just what it is: too lacking in testability, testing, and test results, to be called scientific theory. Also, to point out how human beings (and animals) have abilities that are simply not addressable by the vain materialist philosophy at the heart of Darwinism.

Go ahead with your pseudo-science, if you must. That is not my turf.