Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Between the Lines
Not extraordinary at all. Try a google search for "evolution fraud" and you get about 9,960,000 results. Use "science fraud" and you will find about 20,700,000 results! Try "religious fraud" and you will get 3,130,000 results. Do you see a trend here?

It is not logical to suggest that the number of "hits" on a general event in a Google search can be used to determine the number of times that said evnt has occured.
296 posted on 09/19/2006 11:03:14 AM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio
It is not logical to suggest that the number of "hits" on a general event in a Google search can be used to determine the number of times that said event has occured.

I never suggested that. Did you read my post? Here it is again:

My point was that there is dishonesty on all sides of this issue.
406 posted on 09/19/2006 8:00:55 PM PDT by Between the Lines (Be careful how you live your life, it may be the only gospel anyone reads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson