[Between the Lines]

It is not logical to suggest that the number of "hits" on a general event in a Google search can be used to determine the number of times that said event has occured.

I never suggested that. Did you read my post? Here it is again:

Try a google search for "evolution fraud" and you get about 9,960,000 results. Use "science fraud" and you will find about 20,700,000 results! Try "religious fraud" and you will get 3,130,000 results. Do you see a trend here?

No the trend I am trying to get you to see is not that there are more reports on scientific fraud than on religious fraud. It is that there are numerous reports of fraud on all sides. There are just too many people that are willing to further their cause by any means.

You seem to have a preconceived notion that scientific thought is of a higher standard or more virtuous than others. We are all human and we are all fallible. There are honest and dishonest men in all camps.

My point was that there is dishonesty on all sides of this issue.

[Dimensio]

You were asked in a previous posting to Please document "many" instances of "present" "evolutionists" who "have all the answers figured out" and are "bending facts every which way to make things come out the way they want.".

Referencing the number of hits from a Google search on the phrase "science fraud" does not address this request. It appears that you are instead attempting to change the subject.