Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Book of Mormon Challenge
Joseph Smith America Prophet ^ | 2006

Posted on 04/27/2006 3:03:34 PM PDT by restornu

The Book of Mormon is often dismissed as gibberish by those who have never taken the trouble to read it. In fact, its very existence poses a serious puzzle if it is not what it claims to be - an ancient record. Below is the Book of Mormon Challenge, an assignment that Professor Hugh Nibley at BYU sometimes gave to students in a required class on the Book of Mormon. The following text is taken from the Collected Works of Hugh Nibley, Vol.8, Ch.11, Pg.221 - Pg.222:

Since Joseph Smith was younger than most of you and not nearly so experienced or well-educated as any of you at the time he copyrighted the Book of Mormon, it should not be too much to ask you to hand in by the end of the semester (which will give you more time than he had) a paper of, say, five to six hundred pages in length. Call it a sacred book if you will, and give it the form of a history. Tell of a community of wandering Jews in ancient times; have all sorts of characters in your story, and involve them in all sorts of public and private vicissitudes; give them names--hundreds of them--pretending that they are real Hebrew and Egyptian names of circa 600 b.c.; be lavish with cultural and technical details--manners and customs, arts and industries, political and religious institutions, rites, and traditions, include long and complicated military and economic histories; have your narrative cover a thousand years without any large gaps; keep a number of interrelated local histories going at once; feel free to introduce religious controversy and philosophical discussion, but always in a plausible setting; observe the appropriate literary conventions and explain the derivation and transmission of your varied historical materials.

Above all, do not ever contradict yourself! For now we come to the really hard part of this little assignment. You and I know that you are making this all up--we have our little joke--but just the same you are going to be required to have your paper published when you finish it, not as fiction or romance, but as a true history! After you have handed it in you may make no changes in it (in this class we always use the first edition of the Book of Mormon); what is more, you are to invite any and all scholars to read and criticize your work freely, explaining to them that it is a sacred book on a par with the Bible. If they seem over-skeptical, you might tell them that you translated the book from original records by the aid of the Urim and Thummim--they will love that! Further to allay their misgivings, you might tell them that the original manuscript was on golden plates, and that you got the plates from an angel. Now go to work and good luck!

To date no student has carried out this assignment, which, of course, was not meant seriously. But why not? If anybody could write the Book of Mormon, as we have been so often assured, it is high time that somebody, some devoted and learned minister of the gospel, let us say, performed the invaluable public service of showing the world that it can be done." - Hugh Nibley

Structure and Complexity of the Book of Mormon First Nephi gives us first a clear and vivid look at the world of Lehi, a citizen of Jerusalem but much at home in the general world of the New East of 600 B.C. Then it takes us to the desert, where Lehi and his family wander for eight years, doing all the things that wandering families in the desert should do. The manner of their crossing the ocean is described, as is the first settlement and hard pioneer life in the New World dealt with.... The book of Mosiah describes a coronation rite in all its details and presents extensive religious and political histories mixed in with a complicated background of exploration and colonization. The book of Alma is marked by long eschatological discourses and a remarkably full and circumstantial military history. The main theme of the book of Helaman is the undermining of society by moral decay and criminal conspiracy; the powerful essay on crime is carried into the next book, where the ultimate dissolution of the Nephite government is described.

Then comes the account of the great storm and earthquakes, in which the writer, ignoring a splendid opportunity for exaggeration, has as accurately depicted the typical behavior of the elements on such occasions as if he were copying out of a modern textbook on seismology.... [Soon] after the catastrophe, Jesus Christ appeared to the most pious sectaries who had gathered at the temple.

...Can anyone now imagine the terrifying prospect of confronting the Christian world of 1830 with the very words of Christ? ...

But the boldness of the thing is matched by the directness and nobility with which the preaching of the Savior and the organization of the church are described. After this comes a happy history and then the usual signs of decline and demoralization. The death-struggle of the Nephite civilization is described with due attention to all the complex factors that make up an exceedingly complicated but perfectly consistent picture of decline and fall. Only one who attempts to make a full outline of Book of Mormon history can begin to appreciate its immense complexity; and never once does the author get lost (as the student repeatedly does, picking his way out of one maze after another only with the greatest effort), and never once does he contradict himself. We should be glad to learn of any other like performance in the history of literature. - Hugh Nibley, Collected Works Vol. 8

The four types of biblical experts There are four kinds of biblical experts: At the very top are the professionals who have been doing biblical research all their adult lives. They are usually professors in leading universities in various fields that are related to the Bible such as archaeologists, historians, paleographers, professors of the Bible, and professors of Near Eastern languages and literature.

These people are the most credible of all biblical experts and do not let religious views get in the way of the truth. This is why a lot of them consider themselves to be nonbelievers in the modern Christian and Jewish faiths. Their reputation and standing in the academic community is very important to them. This causes them to be cautious and not rashly declare statements upon any subject without presenting verifiable proof for their claims. It is to them that encyclopedias, journals and universities go to for information. Their community is very small, but extremely influential in the secular world. One distinctive feature of this group is the difficulty outsiders face when reading their writings which causes them to be a fairly closed society.

The second group of biblical experts are those who have legitimate degrees and may have initially been in the first group but were spurned by the first group for being unreliable because they disregard demonstrable proof simply because their religious convictions teach otherwise. For them, their religion's teaching overrides real biblical research. Very few of them can be considered Fundamentalists.

The third group of biblical experts are the "biblical experts." These people disregard the works and conclusions of the first group, and view the second group as their mentors. Nearly all anti-Mormons who produce anti-Mormon paraphernalia fall into this group. Their views are purely theological and display ignorance of legitimate biblical studies. Their arguments are non-rational and are frequently sensational hype and empty rhetoric. These people are very vocal and constantly parade their "expertise" upon the unknowing masses by giving seminars in various churches and religious schools. Nearly all of them are Fundamentalists.

The fourth group of "biblical experts" are those who have never read the Bible completely and do not even know the history and contents of the Bible. They are completely reliant upon materials produced by the third group and may have five verses in the Bible memorized to quote at people they encounter (in nearly every instance John 3:16 and John 14:6 are included in these five verses) to give the impression they are experts in the Bible. They usually need the Table of Contents to find various biblical books and are extremely vocal in their condemnation of Mormonism. They personify the wise adage:

The less knowledge a man has, the more vocal he is about his expertise.

They read an anti-Mormon book and suddenly they're experts on Mormonism:

A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

The remainder of Christians are those who believe in the Bible but never read it. The Bible is a very complex book for most Christians and seems to possess a power that intimidates them. This is why a normal Christian is impressed whenever he or she encounters an individual who can quote scripture. It is this ignorance of the Bible that causes some to proclaim themselves "biblical experts."

I am not aware of anyone in the first group of biblical experts who are anti-Mormon. If anything, real biblical scholars who know Mormon theology have a profound sense of admiration for it and are usually astonished that so many facets of Mormonism reflect authentic biblical teachings.

They are frequently puzzled at how Joseph Smith could find out the real biblical teaching since modern Judaism and Christianity abandoned them thousands of years ago. Uniquely Mormon doctrines such as the anthropomorphic nature of God, the divine nature and deification potential of man, the plurality of deities, the divine sanction of polygamy, the fallacy of sola scriptura, the superiority of the charismatic leaders over the ecclesiastical leaders and their importance, the inconsequence of Original Sin because of the Atonement of Christ, the importance of contemporary revelation, and so forth are all original Jewish and Christian thought before they were abandoned mainly due to Greek philosophical influence.

Mormonism to these scholars is the only faith that preserves the characteristics of the early chosen people. This doesn’t mean these scholars believe Mormonism is the true religion, since their studies are on an intellectual level instead of a spiritual one.

On the other hand, the leaders of the anti-Mormon movement are nearly all in the third category with a couple in the second. Real biblical experts (who aren’t Mormon) and are in the first category normally refer to the “biblical experts” in the third group as the “know-nothings” or the “Fundamentalist know-nothings.” These terms aren’t completely derogatory, but are accurate descriptions of the knowledge of the “biblical experts” in the third group. Ed Watson - Mormonism: Faith of the 21st Century


TOPICS: History; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: biglove; cult; fakes; forgeries; josephsmithisafraud; ldschurch; mormon; moronchurch; nontrinitarians; universalists
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580 ... 781-787 next last
To: restornu

Yes, so Joseph Smith took a name from the Bible... big deal. I named my dog Obediah when I was seven years old. Can you imagine that! This from a young uneducated child living in isolation in Southern Utah. However did I do this???


541 posted on 05/09/2006 10:33:00 AM PDT by colorcountry (He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he cannot lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 540 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry; DelphiUser
Also you should ping me when speaking of me.

I said, DU, that you failed to follow two posting guidelines--it was actually three since you didn't ping CC.

I think you're vying for Freeper NHoF [Notorious Hall of Fame} Protocol Violation status--all in one thread!

542 posted on 05/09/2006 10:37:49 AM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 536 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry

You got to do better than sour grapes!


543 posted on 05/09/2006 10:40:12 AM PDT by restornu (Elevate Your Thoughts! Its all depends on who dominates the colors of the Gumballs!<:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 541 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry
drawing it closely around his face to exclude the light;

In darkness did it originate; in darkness it remains.

544 posted on 05/09/2006 10:40:27 AM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 535 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry
Does the physical existence of plates fit into this scenario? No, it doesn't.

Excellent point. What does "something resembling parchment"--which supposedly appeared out of nowhere inside the hat--have to do w/gold plates?

If the power of God was involved, why did God need gold plates to translate the Book of Mormon into parchment pieces that supposedly delivered each character to Joseph's eyes?

Obviously, the hat wasn't holding any heavy gold plate. And according to this account, the "spiritual light" wasn't illuminating any gold plate.

545 posted on 05/09/2006 10:46:24 AM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 535 | View Replies]

Am I allowed to smile?


546 posted on 05/09/2006 10:48:07 AM PDT by restornu (Elevate Your Thoughts! Its all depends on who dominates the colors of the Gumballs!<:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 542 | View Replies]

To: restornu

Yep, you're right I only do this because I'm sour grapes.: )

You found me out! /sarc


547 posted on 05/09/2006 10:48:14 AM PDT by colorcountry (He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he cannot lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 543 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian

>> We are NOT the same poster under two names.

Are you sure? (Snicker) Sorry about that, I do seem to be having trouble keeping you guys separate, though.


548 posted on 05/09/2006 10:50:38 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry; restornu

>>you should ping me when speaking of me.

Um, tried to, messed that up, Sorry

>>I didn't hint that it was one of you two.

Sorry, I thought you were, no offence intended, and non taken, this was more of a joke to restornu than any comment on you, no smear intended.


549 posted on 05/09/2006 10:56:01 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 536 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser

Always make sure you ping the right color!:)

550 posted on 05/09/2006 10:56:27 AM PDT by restornu (Elevate Your Thoughts! Its all depends on who dominates the colors of the Gumballs!<:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 548 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry; Quester

You wandered off from their testimonies, they claim to have Heard the voice of god, seen and handled the plates, and seen an angel (take both the 3 and 8 together).

>>Is this evidence?

Yes.


551 posted on 05/09/2006 11:00:26 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 535 | View Replies]

To: Colofornian; All

>>I think you're vying for Freeper NHoF [Notorious Hall of
>>Fame} Protocol Violation status--all in one thread!

Hey at least I’ll be famous for something (Grin). I may just add "All" to my posts in the future…

Hey, who's already been inducted in to this hall? I have to be careful of who I associate with now that I am famous and all.


552 posted on 05/09/2006 11:05:09 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 542 | View Replies]

To: restornu; DelphiUser; Colofornian; colorcountry
It is Colo-fornian as in Colorado and California.

I am color-country as in the color of my country is Red.

Only one of us is color the other is a State...that should be simple enough.


553 posted on 05/09/2006 11:10:58 AM PDT by colorcountry (He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he cannot lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser

Those testimonies wouldn't stand up in a court of law IMHO. Your use may vary.


554 posted on 05/09/2006 11:21:22 AM PDT by colorcountry (He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he cannot lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 551 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry; Colofornian; restornu

I keep names in alphabetical order in my brain. (Yes, I know its weird, but I have always had problems with names) I can always get the first letter, but sometimes that is as far as I can get.

Being a programmer, multiword names have orders of precedence, and ColorCountry And ColorFornian would be very close and probably related in their function. Since you agree on your position here and post similar sounding posts. I will probably continue to confuse your names, despite my best intentions.

Could one of you pick up a chronic spelling problem or something? /Humor


555 posted on 05/09/2006 11:25:06 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry; DelphiUser

It only needs to be found in the courts of Heaven not your earth church or courts


556 posted on 05/09/2006 11:25:42 AM PDT by restornu (Elevate Your Thoughts! Its all depends on who dominates the colors of the Gumballs!<:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser
Three of the eight witnesses made separate statements that they had handled the plates. They were Joseph's two brothers, Hyrum and Samuel, and John Whitmer. Hyrum and Samuel's statements are further qualified by their brother William who, in an interview, also claimed to have handled the plates, said:

"I did not see them uncovered, but I handled them and hefted them while wrapped in a tow frock and judged them to have weighed about sixty pounds. ... Father and my brother Samuel saw them as I did while in the frock. So did Hyrum and others of the family." When the interviewer asked if he didn't want to remove the cloth and see the bare plates, William replied, "No, for father had just asked if he might not be permitted to do so, and Joseph, putting his hand on them said; 'No, I am instructed not to show them to any one. If I do, I will transgress and lose them again.' Besides, we did not care to have him break the commandment and suffer as he did before." (Zion's Ensign, p. 6, January 13, 1894, cited in Church of Christ broadside.)

557 posted on 05/09/2006 11:33:13 AM PDT by colorcountry (He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he cannot lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 551 | View Replies]

To: colorcountry

>> Those testimonies wouldn't stand up in a court of law IMHO. Your use may vary.

Few religions would stand up in a court of law.

The point being, they testified of Joseph Smith, and the Golden plates. You cannot say there is no evidence and be correct in light of their testimonies. You could say there is no evidence accepted by you, and be correct.

(Words are important because a gentleman always means what he says, and you cannot mean what you say if you can’t say what you mean – The last emperor)


558 posted on 05/09/2006 11:41:04 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser; Colofornian
ColorCountry And ColorFornian would be very close

There's your problem it isn't COLORFornian it is COLO-Fornian.

Still it's okay if you confuse me with Colofornian. Great minds think alike.

559 posted on 05/09/2006 11:41:42 AM PDT by colorcountry (He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he cannot lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 555 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser; Quester
The point being, they testified of Joseph Smith, and the Golden plates.

Well, YOU testify of Joseph Smith and the Gold Plates (because you believe you've had a witness that the Book of Mormon is true.)

Sorry, but your "testimony" also bears no witness to me. This backs up Quester's supposition that there is NO evidence. Their signed testimony that they saw something, they lifted something heavy, and it may have been a hallucination just doesn't hold up.

560 posted on 05/09/2006 11:53:34 AM PDT by colorcountry (He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he cannot lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 558 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580 ... 781-787 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson