>> Those testimonies wouldn't stand up in a court of law IMHO. Your use may vary.
Few religions would stand up in a court of law.
The point being, they testified of Joseph Smith, and the Golden plates. You cannot say there is no evidence and be correct in light of their testimonies. You could say there is no evidence accepted by you, and be correct.
(Words are important because a gentleman always means what he says, and you cannot mean what you say if you can’t say what you mean – The last emperor)
Well, YOU testify of Joseph Smith and the Gold Plates (because you believe you've had a witness that the Book of Mormon is true.)
Sorry, but your "testimony" also bears no witness to me. This backs up Quester's supposition that there is NO evidence. Their signed testimony that they saw something, they lifted something heavy, and it may have been a hallucination just doesn't hold up.