Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: badabing98
"Latin is the official language of the church and has been for over a thousand years."

So what. We're talking about the mass for the peoples of the world--not the bureacrats of the church.

"The pre vatican II mass is alot more reverent than the N.O. Mass issued in 1970."

Why?? Because it is said in a dead language??

And becuase Latin is a dead language, it makes it more suitable since its words cannot change."

What the heck does THAT matter, if none of the listeners can understand it?? It has to be translated anyway--why not just use the translation directly.

5 posted on 04/23/2006 5:45:53 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Wonder Warthog

The entire reason this "dead" language was chosen was to (a) honor the Church's past -- we are and were headquarted in Rome (a place where Latin was spoken) and (b) to provide a common language for worship. This would enable someone like me to attend Mass in Germany and have the exact same experience.

The Novus Ordo Mass does not allow for the "portability" of faith when travelling...and it's much less reverent and moving.


10 posted on 04/23/2006 9:19:50 AM PDT by AlaninSA (It's one nation under God -- brought to you by the Knights of Columbus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Wonder Warthog


33 posted on 04/24/2006 8:16:33 AM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson