Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: kosta50
I think what would really help would be a true synod of the entire Church. I doubt there would be any real outcome but the very fact that the branches would see the points of views held by the other and WHY they hold it would be a step forward.

I think we've learnt something ourselves, here, on this forum. I;ve learnt about why the Orthodox think the way they do and now, even why Baptists, Lutherans, Anglicans etc. do that.

I pray that Protestants would keep aside their instinctive, ingrained, long taught practise to raise barriers each time they see soemthing coming from Rome and SEE the point of view of the Church and WHY we hold that.

Perhaps to heal the Reformation breach, we would instead need the Orthodox to reach out to the Protestants -- the bogeyman figure of the Pope would not prejudice the Protestants and they would be able to see clearly the truth held by The Church
1,846 posted on 01/22/2006 8:54:07 AM PST by Cronos (Never forget 9/11. Restore Hagia Sophia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1820 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos; Kolokotronis
A true Synod of the entire Church would mean that we are one Church again; otherwise its authority would be empty pretense.

In order for us to even convene a Synod with universal (ecumenical) authority, we have to work out the obstacles inherent in the role and scope of the papacy. This is precisely what is planned at the forthcoming Caholic-Orthodox meeting in Belgrade, Serbia.

If we can work out the role of papal primacy to everyone's satisfaction, then it is clear that the Pope can call an Ecumenical Council to which both sides of the Church will respond. As long as we understand that our theological differences may not be true theological errors but theologumena within the bounds of Tradition, we can look forward to a true, spiritual re-union, and communion.

The same cannot be said of the Protestants because they are not in the Church. Their teaching is heresy, by definition (i.e. outside of the teaching of the Church). We cannot accept their teaching as aberrant opinions because they have forsaken the authority of apostolic succession and, by that act, the validity of their "clergy." They are apostates, even though they profess faith in Christ (so do the Mormons, and JWs, and even the Gnostics!).

Within the Protestant amalgam there are groups that are close to the Church, such as some Anglicans and some Lutherans, whose return to the Church is possible (and in the case of Anglicans eer more so likely). But those who deny Trinity, consider Christ a brother of Lucifer, a lesser God, or who profess double predestination, that God created evil, those who ordain women as priests and bishops, those who profess that the Eucharist is only a symbolic presence of Chirst, that Chirst has only one Nature, etc. -- no matter how devout they are in their beliefs, and I believe they are -- they can never be reconciled in the Church because those teachings are outside of anything knonw to the Tradition.

1,854 posted on 01/22/2006 2:07:58 PM PST by kosta50 (Eastern Orthodoxy is pure Christianity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1846 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson