Marriage equality endorsed by committee

The United Church of Christ ^ | July 4, 2005 | Irwin Smallwood

[lightman]

Marriage equality endorsed by committee

Contributed by Irwin Smallwood Monday, 04 July 2005

Late Sunday afternoon, the UCC's General Synodtook a significant step toward becoming the first mainline Christian body to offer its endorsement of full marriage equality -- regardless of gender -- when a resolution in support of "equal marriage rights for all" made its way out of committee by an overwhelming margin.

The religious wresting now moves to full plenary session, where all delegates will take up the issue on Monday morning.

Although the committee’s action was not unexpected, the near-unanimous decision was considered a surprise of sorts. Of the 54 delegates voting, by voice, only two or three nays were heard. The result turned the large conference room into a chapel of restrained thanksgiving, with delegates and visitors joining hands and singing a benediction.

The committee – led through a complicated process by the Rev. Elizabeth Nordbeck, professor of theology at UCC-related Andover Newton Theological School in Massachusetts – was charged with the task of leading consideration of three diverging resolutions on marriage. In the end, the committee recommended that two of the more like-minded measures be combined into one and affirmed by delegates.

The main body of the combined resolution came from the Southern California –Nevada Conference. The spirit of a resolution from the Central Atlantic Conference calling for more study of the issue was written into it after its presenters expressed their desire to join in support of the Southern California – Nevada’s proposal.

The third proposed resolution, which sought to define marriage as “between one man and one woman with no exceptions,” will be forwarded to the plenary with the recommendation that it be rejected. It actually evoked almost as much debate in open forum as the resolution that passed. And the vote to recommend its rejection was nearly unanimous, with only a handful of nays and a couple of abstentions.

Although it includes a wide range of recommendations, the marriage equality proposal’s main thrust declares that “the government should not interfere with couples regardless of gender who choose to marry and share fully and equally in the rights, responsibilities and commitment of legally recognized marriage…”

A recast portion of the proposed resolution, crafted to include the essence of Central Atlantic’s original document, “calls upon all settings of the United Church of Christ to engage in serious, respectful and prayerful discussion of the covenantal relationship of marriage and equal rights for couples regardless of gender.”

The most substantive change in the resolution to be considered Monday came in response to concerns from delegates in areas of the country that are expected to have difficulty receiving marriage equality affirmations. The seven main points of the original equal marriage rights proposal were reordered, putting first the four emphases that called upon the denomination to bear witness to the wider world.

Then a transitional sentence was inserted before the final three points that call upon the church to look inward in study and prayer. It read, “In recognition that these resolutions may not reflect the views or current understanding of all bodies in the gathered church, the General Synod encourages the following…”

On Sunday evening, the UCC’s Coalition for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Concerns sang songs of praise as an estimated 3,000 delegates and visitors made their way into evening worship.

[lightman]

The result turned the large conference room into a chapel of restrained thanksgiving, with delegates and visitors joining hands and singing a benediction.

I do not know which "god" from whom these "blessings" flow, but surely it is not the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, surely it is not the God who created male and female in the Divine image and who said that "a man shall leave his father and mother and cleave to his wife."

[Just A Nobody]

Any one that has actually READ the Bible can NOT condone or accept this.

[RedRover]

Is this a church or a country club?

(Dumb question!)

[NYer]

Sounds more like a popularity vote! Is anyone keeping a scorecard as to which religious groups have caved to the homosexual agenda? The ranks are growing swiftly. Of course, nothing new here. Once they separated themselves from the teaching authority of the church founded by Christ, then anything goes.

[lightman]

The problem with most of the "mainline" Protestant denominations is that any and every doctrine, belief, and practice could be voted upon these general Synods or assemblies (terminology varies) which occur every two to four years. The UCC and Evangelical Lutheran Church in America hold these meetings every two years on odd numbered years; the Episcopal Church USA every three years (next one in 2006) and the United Methodist every four years (next one in 2008).

The heart of the problem is that the magisterium should not reside in legislative assembly made up of (again, this varies) 50% to 66.6% lay people. It is democracy run amok.
As Benedict XVI so wisely says, "truth is not determined by majority vote."

[dangus]

UCC. Putting the "UCC" in "yUCCk."

[jkl1122]

Truth is also not determined by man, but only by God. That is why we have His Word.