To: Pyro7480
It is getting to the point of obsession, isn't it? I'm one of those who can see that issue from both sides. If they continue to write about it for the rest of the year, then it is something to be concerned about.
Me too. I was certainly conflicted during the run-up to the Iraq War, but what's done is done. As JP II said, we should be concentrating on rebuilding Iraq now, not refusing to help because we don't like how the current circumstances came about. What NOR does on the Iraq war is destructive criticism which is never a good thing, IMHO.
On this matter, NOR is like a petulant little kid who constantly brings up an old perceived injury any time it's even tangentially relevant to the conversation. And we all know how annoying that can get...
14 posted on
05/26/2005 10:06:26 AM PDT by
Antoninus
(Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini, Hosanna in excelsis!)
To: Antoninus
Except it isn't done. American troops are still getting killed for no apparent reason. If New Oxford Review is still hammering Bush on the Iraq war, good for them.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson