Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Viva Christo Rey
The SSPX betrays its flock a little each day, and some day it will betray all of them completely.

Let's get our facts straight. This Bishop Rifan is the one who broke with the SSPX. The SSPX magazine in France is reporting on the facts of Rifan's collaboration with the New Mass. The SSPX has always taken a strong stand against this sort of abuse.

Just like Rifan broke away from the SSPX and is now "concelebrating," so too the other group that broke away from the SSPX, the FSSP also are sometimes forced to concelebrate. The Vatican removed the elected superior of the FSSP and installed their preferred man, who then reached a deal in which FSSP priests could be required to concelebrate with the bishop of the diocese in which they resided. This was the quid-pro-quo to get admittance to certain dioceses. I believe that Indianapolis was one. By concelebrating the New Mass once per year, they destroy the foundation of the work they do the other 364 days of the year.

Someday perhaps there will come a time when your accusation of the SSPX "selling out" will come true, and then you can say "I told you so" all you want. But it hasn't happened yet, so your random and misdirected charges only look ridiculous when they are aimed 180 degrees in the wrong direction.

16 posted on 11/10/2004 1:53:50 PM PST by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Maximilian

Yeah let's get our facts straight.

The indult sold out and coupled the true Mass with the 'faith' of satan.

The SSPX 'formed' the priests who defected to the indult so poorly that given the doctrinal contradictions of the SSPX, those priests who defected from them embarced the church and vicar of satan.

The SSPX accept the heretical and invalid 1983 Code of Canon Law.

The SSPX accept the heretical and invalid sacrifice in the new mass as valid.

The SSPX accept the invalid rite of ordination as valid. Even Lefebvre did not accept the additional changes to the rite after he unwisely accepted the 1968 change.

The SSPX has employed invalidly rodained priests in its chapels without conditionally re-ordaining them under the true rite.

The SSPX continues to worship a heretical 'pope' as a true pope even though their founder Abp. Lefebvre conceded that if JP2 was heretical he is not the pope.

The SSPX publishes a book where it condemens the concpet of the see being vacant even though Abp. Lefebvre siad it was possible as well as their current Bp. Tissier de Mallerais.

The SSPX lies constantly.

The SSPX steals constantly.

If you have not expereinced the two items above that my chapel and many others unfortunatley have, then SHUT UP AND LEARN SOMETHING!!


21 posted on 11/10/2004 2:22:05 PM PST by Viva Christo Rey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Maximilian; Robert Drobot

Did Bishop Rifan leave SSPX to join Campos or was he with Campos from the beginning? Maybe I'm wrong but I always thought the latter.


25 posted on 11/10/2004 2:41:41 PM PST by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson