[DAVEY CROCKETT]

re: the little horn's id as antiochus epiphanes (#246). i dont think that the history of ae fulfills the prophetic description on several points, but i think ONE point (of disagreement with prophecy) would be enough to disqualify ae as being the little horn.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I agree ae is not ac. posted his history from Quix just as some example of what we are looking at.

[DocRock]

re: the little horn's id as antiochus epiphanes (#246). i dont think that the history of ae fulfills the prophetic description on several points, but i think ONE point (of disagreement with prophecy) would be enough to disqualify ae as being the little horn.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I agree ae is not ac. posted his history from Quix just as some example of what we are looking at.

---

See my post # 270 above. There are two different "little horns". One is the future time view of the Antichrist and the other is AE (a.k.a. Antiochus IV). There is no question about his desecration of the temple and it's importance in referencing the time line laid out later in Daniel.