Replies

To: Alex Murphy; nobdysfool; bush_4_4more

Milquetoast was not a previously banned freeper. And Milquetoast was not banned for being an abusive poster. He was banned for simply being himself.

You guys seem to be drawing a lot of attention to your new calvinist friend. Or is he an old calvinist friend?

15 posted on 07/12/2004 1:32:28 PM PDT by P-Marlowe

To: P-Marlowe; nobdysfool

And Milquetoast was not banned for being an abusive poster. He was banned for simply being himself.

Milquetoast was always two-faced, P-. And as you know, FR only succeeded in half-banning him. I wonder which side?

You guys seem to be drawing a lot of attention to your new calvinist friend. Or is he an old calvinist friend?

Could be he's not a friend at all. There are a few similarities between his dental work and a moose bite found on OP's sister. But this thread isn't about the poster; it's about the posted article. What do you think of it?

16 posted on 07/12/2004 1:54:10 PM PDT by Alex Murphy ("I talk to myself because I like dealing with a better class of people" - Jackie Mason)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794