And Milquetoast was not banned for being an abusive poster. He was banned for simply being himself. Milquetoast was always two-faced, P-. And as you know, FR only succeeded in half-banning him. I wonder which side?
You guys seem to be drawing a lot of attention to your new calvinist friend. Or is he an old calvinist friend?
Could be he's not a friend at all. There are a few similarities between his dental work and a moose bite found on OP's sister. But this thread isn't about the poster; it's about the posted article. What do you think of it?
Alex Murphy:
But this thread isn't about the poster; it's about the posted article. What do you think of it? Considering that he already admitted that he hasn't read Calvin's work, I would suspect that he is a bit shy about commenting on something which he only has a second source familiarity. Besides he has told me not to talk to him and it might be considered rude for him to presume to talk on this thread about a topic I started.
Your brother,
Christian.