Extremely interesting.
I've never thought much about it. Before reading this article if I had to categorized myself I would have said the church is a continuation of Israel. However, I find myself in complete agreement with the author that we are a replacement of Israel. It makes perfect sense.
So you believe in replacement theology? I thought I read this as the author saying the Church and Israel are two different things, not that the Church has replaced Israel. The view he says he agrees with is the second one, that we are different, not the first which is replacement theology. Unless of course, I read this with blond eyes, which is possible! :-)