Replies

You are what you are, and you obviously are convinced that your isogesis of Canon Law is a worthy approach. You have no compunction about presenting yourself as an expert on the Code of Canon Law, when you are not, and you look for a transparent historical record of papal acta that will not be made known, if ever, until the death of the local bishops involved, the current Pope, or possibly not until a determination of the Papal archivist at a future date. You know the traps you set, and the games you play. Call them by any noble phrase you like. Noble they are not.

You used to write vicious Freeper mail to my father history_matters. I do not expect you to be just or fair. You called him the most irritating person on FreeRepublic. So I always bear that in mind when I read your pontifical pronouncements. It helps me bear in mind what sort of person you have been as witnessed by your writing on forum and by Freepermail. Let others deduce if you are a worthy source to be believed, if you are a deacon, if you are a Catholic, if you are credible source of information. For my part, your words tell me, No, not likely so.

Sinkspur almost drove me off of the FR religious forum because he managed to turn every thread into an argument about himself and his particular obsessions. We have interesting things to talk about here, and sinkspur is not one of them. He is rude, hostile and badgering. And I hope you complained to the moderator about his private mails to your father.

I simply don't respond to him if he posts to me, because I have found it not worth the trouble. I suggest that we all do the same.

== You called him the most irritating person on FreeRepublic.

One of Sink's more damning statements.

Though it's the "attentions" -- however vicious -- of folks like Sinkspur that ensure irritating men like your father end up pearls of beauty where the Lord's concerned, I suspect.