Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Again, Jews Fault Mormons Over Posthumous Baptisms
NY Times ^ | December 21, 2003 | IAN URBINA

Posted on 12/21/2003 4:41:40 AM PST by Pharmboy

Jewish group says it is considering legal action in an effort to stop the Mormon Church from posthumously baptizing many Jews, especially Holocaust victims.

Under the practice, known by Mormons as vicarious baptism — a significant rite of the church — the dead are baptized by living church members who stand in as proxies.

But in 1995, after evidence emerged that at least 380,000 names of Jewish Holocaust victims were on baptismal lists in the church's extensive archives in Salt Lake City, the church agreed to end vicarious baptism without consent from the descendants of the dead. Church officials also said the church would remove the names of Holocaust victims placed on the lists before 1995.

"For the last seven years, we've had entirely cordial relations with the Mormons," said Ernest Michel, who negotiated the agreement on behalf of the American Gathering of Jewish Holocaust Survivors, which is based in New York and claims 180,000 members. "But the agreement is clear and they have not held up their end."

Last year, Helen Radkey, an independent researcher in Salt Lake City, gave Mr. Michel evidence that the Mormon lists still included the names of at least 20,000 Jews, many of them Holocaust victims and prominent figures like the philosopher Theodor Herzl and David Ben-Gurion, the first prime minister of Israel. Ms. Radkey also provided Mr. Michel with evidence that many of these Jews had been baptized after the 1995 agreement.

But Mormon officials say they remain in full compliance with the 1995 agreement.

"We have actually gone above and beyond," said D. Todd Christofferson, a church official involved with the negotiations. The church removed the names of Holocaust victims listed before 1995 and continues to instruct its members to avoid baptizing Jews who are not directly related to living Mormons or whose immediate family has not given written consent, Mr. Christofferson said.

But he said it was not the church's responsibility to monitor the archives to ensure that no new Jewish names appear. "We never had in mind that we would, on a continual basis, go in and ferret out the Jewish names," Mr. Christofferson said, adding that the labor involved in constantly sifting through an ever-expanding archive, which contains more than 400 million names, would represent an "intolerable burden."

"When the church is made aware of documented concerns, action is taken in compliance with the agreement," he said.

Some Jewish genealogists agree with the Mormon interpretation of the agreement. "I have a copy of the agreement," said Gary Mokotoff, the publisher of Avotaynu, the International Review of Jewish Genealogy. "The wording is vague in some places, but it definitely does not obligate the Mormons to scour their own archives on an ongoing basis."

But Mr. Michel, who said he became involved in the issue after reading about posthumous baptisms in the Jewish newspaper The Forward, contends that the agreement obliges the Mormon Church to monitor the post-1995 lists and remove the names of Jews that appear.

"They put the names in there, they should have to take them out, and the agreement says as much," he said. "Why should we have to do their job for them?" He said the group was considering legal action but would not provide details.

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, whom Mr. Michel contacted, said she planned to take up the matter with Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah, a Republican and a Mormon. "Senator Hatch was immensely helpful in brokering the 1995 agreement, so we're hoping he can get involved again now," she said in a telephone interview.

With approximately 11 million members worldwide, the Mormon Church, known formally as the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, is one of the fastest-growing in the world, partly because of a strong missionary effort. The importance of the family structure is central to church doctrine and is a reason for the extensive archives kept by the International Genealogical Index in Salt Lake City. The archives include detailed biographical information of 400 million people going back centuries. The names of those to be posthumously baptized are drawn from the archives.

According to Mormon theology, all people, living or dead, possess "free agency," and posthumous baptisms provide only an option, not an obligation, to join the religion in the afterlife. Church membership numbers do not include those baptized after death, Mr. Christofferson said.

Originally, the practice was reserved for ancestors of church members, but over the years many other people have been baptized posthumously. "There is no way to prevent overzealous members doing mission work from submitting names that don't belong," Mr. Christofferson said.

Ms. Radkey, an Australian-born Christian, said she began researching the Mormon practice in 1999 after discovering that the teenage diarist Anne Frank had been posthumously baptized.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 761 next last
To: SaucyCranberry
As for denying Christ thats sheer garbage.

Jesus Christ is the Son of God, and is the creator of this world under the direction of His Father.

He is the mediator between us and His Father.

We don't believe Jesus and His Father are the same person. No.

281 posted on 12/22/2003 10:53:42 AM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Seems to me that some of the Jews and the Catholics here at FR take it more seriously than most of the LDS do. Geez they're all having a hissy fit over a ritual that they don't even believe in and they treat it as if the ritual itself can move heaven and earth and drag their long lost ancestors out of their restful peace with God and into the evil conniving hands of the Mormon heirarchy.

Gross Hypocrisy. They don't need to get a lawyer. They need to get a life.

282 posted on 12/22/2003 11:08:33 AM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
I don't want to hijack this thread any further, especially when you're not going to come to believe that Christ is in fact one with God and the Holy Spirit. Anymore than you could ever convince me to believe (again) that he was a "person" and separate from the Trinity. FR is a place I enjoy exchanging ideas and sometimes differing points of view with others without having my posts referred to as stupid or garbage. So I'll end my replies here. Peace to you and a Merry Christmas.
283 posted on 12/22/2003 11:10:18 AM PST by SaucyCranberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
Ahhhh...someone who believes that individuals should be harrased BEYOND the grave. Lemme guess: you're a telemarketer...no wait...I got it: You produce the spam that clogs my mailbox! Yeah--that's the ticket--LOWEST MORTGAGE RATES NOW. That's you, right?
284 posted on 12/22/2003 11:10:50 AM PST by Pharmboy (History's greatest agent for democracy: The US Armed Forces)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
I'm so curous--what does your sig line stand for?
285 posted on 12/22/2003 11:12:47 AM PST by SaucyCranberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Geez they're all having a hissy fit over a ritual that they don't even believe in and they treat it as if the ritual itself can move heaven and earth and drag their long lost ancestors out of their restful peace with God and into the evil conniving hands of the Mormon heirarchy.

Disclaimer before I begin my post. I don't like the Mormon Church, and I don't care for the Mormons I've met, and I don't care who knows it. You'll get none of this "I'm not a Mormon, but they seem like fine people and some of them are my best friends" nambypamby BS out of me.

Point one: They don't just baptise their ancestors. They baptise whomever they want. Folks on this thread have mentioned Anne Frank. She died as a young girl. She had no children. She's not anybody's ancestor, much less some long lost Mormon granddaughter, and yet it appears that they've performed this ritual on her behalf.

Point two: They can do all the baptising of the dead that they want, but I think non-participants of their religion have every right to be PO'd when they DOCUMENT such happenings. Ridiculous rituals are one thing. Creating and maintaining a database of the non-interested and non-consenting is another.

286 posted on 12/22/2003 11:19:45 AM PST by TontoKowalski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: SaucyCranberry
Repeating what you were taught in seminary. That would be the four-year program high school kids take, just to clarify for those non-Mormons on this board who might compare it with traditional Protestant seminaries (not that you would have any desire to deceive anyone, of course.)

Of course, the seminary course doesn't teach what you claim in any event. This is from the perspective of a student and a teacher in the program.
287 posted on 12/22/2003 11:27:47 AM PST by frgoff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
My... how boastful! "..until JS came along, NOTHING the existing church has done was sufficient."

Not boastful. Just true. The Church organized by Jesus Christ had to be restored. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is the restored Church. Until the Gospel was restored to Joseph Smith, nothing the existing church(es) did was "sufficient". If it was sufficient then there would have been no necessity to have the Church restored.

288 posted on 12/22/2003 11:30:07 AM PST by Spiff (Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: SaucyCranberry
I'm so curous--what does your sig line stand for?

Lord Protector of the Fraternal Order of the Knights of the Eternal Time Table and Grand Advocate for the High Council of the Order of the Eternal Exclamation Point® (without asterik).

For Membership information please go here.

{!}

<><

Marlowe

289 posted on 12/22/2003 11:32:55 AM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
I'm sorry Spiff, I don't follow you. Why can't our ancestors do the accepting themselveS? Why do they need a specific system??????

Baptism, by those possessing the appropriate Priesthood keys and authority, is necessary to enter the Kingdom of God. You can dunk all you want but if you lack the Priesthood - the original or the restored Priesthood - the baptism is not valid.

290 posted on 12/22/2003 11:33:33 AM PST by Spiff (Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
Mormonism is very closely tied to Judaism in several respects. Here's a few off the top of my head:

The need for the Priesthood of Aaron. All Mormon men who are worthy receive the Aaronic priesthood in their thirteenth year.

The return of Elijah, for whom Jews keep an empty chair during passover, happened in the Kirtland temple.

Moses appeared in the Kirtland temple to bestow the keys for the gathering of Israel to the latter-day prophets.

All Mormons must be part of the house of Israel, either through lineage, or by adoption. Your lineage is given in your patriarchal blessing. Personally, I'm of Ephraim. This is essential because God has not forgotten his chosen people, and the blessings of Abraham are only given to Abraham's descendents, either by lineage or adoption.

That's just the two or three I could come up with off the top of my head.
291 posted on 12/22/2003 11:34:38 AM PST by frgoff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: TontoKowalski
Creating and maintaining a database of the non-interested and non-consenting is another.

You don't know that they are not interested and you don't know that they are non-consenting. THEY'RE DEAD!

Keeping a data base is important so that they don't waste their time twice or three times. If they keep a data base, then they can keep their silly time wasting efforts to a minimum.

292 posted on 12/22/2003 11:36:41 AM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
The fundamentalists do!

No, they don't. A fundamentalist Mormon would be someone who follows the current fundamental doctrine and the living Prophet. A fundamentalist Mormon would not practice polygamy and would, in fact, be excommunicated and wouldn't be able to call himself a Mormon any longer. You might call him a fundamentalist polygamist or something like that, but Mormon would not be an appropriate label.

293 posted on 12/22/2003 11:37:08 AM PST by Spiff (Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Keeping a data base is important so that they don't waste their time twice or three times. If they keep a data base, then they can keep their silly time wasting efforts to a minimum.

Then why the hell don't they just say, "JimmyJoe, I baptise you on behalf of all people, living or dead, who may or may not appreciate the effort you are making today."

And be done with it.

294 posted on 12/22/2003 11:39:38 AM PST by TontoKowalski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: King Nothing
" dum dum dum dum dum..."


Matt Stone and Trey Parker - Creators of South Park

"Dumb Dumb Dumb Dumb Dumb Dumb Dumb!!!"

295 posted on 12/22/2003 11:40:32 AM PST by Spiff (Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Because we all know that the eye-opening experience of death and say, perhaps, meeting Jesus Christ with his arm around Joseph Smith and saying: Let me introduce you to someone, would never change anyone's mind. :-)

296 posted on 12/22/2003 11:45:04 AM PST by frgoff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Usually, when a posthumous baptism is performed, the person receiving it is already dead.
I think it's kind of silly to do this to an empty shell, but if it makes the mormans feel good, more power to them.
297 posted on 12/22/2003 11:48:37 AM PST by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redwood71
If I'm not mistaken, putting not so strong mormons into their levels of heaven will allow some of the borderline mormons to move up in the levels. Um, you're mistaken. Don't feel bad, though, people write and say some of the absolute kookiest stuff about Mormons. The whole purpose of baptisms for the dead is to do something for a person which they are unable to do for themselves. It's an act of total selflessness, and it's a real shame that all people can do is ridicule it or attack it.
298 posted on 12/22/2003 11:49:43 AM PST by frgoff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TontoKowalski; White Mountain; Utah Girl; Spiff; frgoff; maui_hawaii
Then why the hell don't they just say, "JimmyJoe, I baptise you on behalf of all people, living or dead, who may or may not appreciate the effort you are making today." And be done with it.

You know that's a darn good idea. I'll ping some LDS folks and maybe they can take it up with the Mr. Hinkley. I don't think Mr. Hinkley would listen to me.

299 posted on 12/22/2003 11:52:50 AM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: philetus
Usually, when a posthumous baptism is performed, the person receiving it is already dead.

When a posthumous baptism is performed they're ALWAYS dead.

I think it's kind of silly to do this to an empty shell, but if it makes the mormans feel good, more power to them.

And if it makes the Jews and Christians feel bad, ef 'em?

300 posted on 12/22/2003 11:53:02 AM PST by Pharmboy (History's greatest agent for democracy: The US Armed Forces)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 761 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson