To: Truth666; martian_22
Four or five fossil species were wrong because
most lists now say there were more? Especially if you include the dead-end branches?
That's the most devastating lie in the history of mankind?
To: *crevo_list; PatrickHenry; Junior
OK, time to go back to work, guys! Darwin Central is unhappy!
To: VadeRetro
To answer you, first of all I need to know what are you stating.
Are you trying to say that it is because of the pieces (parts of skulls or whatever they are) in your photo that people believe in evolution theory ?
75 posted on
10/15/2003 6:27:23 PM PDT by
Truth666
To: VadeRetro
To answer you, first of all I need to know what are you stating.
Are you trying to say that it is because of the pieces (parts of skulls or whatever they are) in your photo that people believe in evolution theory ?
76 posted on
10/15/2003 6:27:27 PM PDT by
Truth666
To: VadeRetro
***
That's the most devastating lie in the history of mankind?***
Granted that sounds rather dramatic. I've seen and heard worse.
82 posted on
10/15/2003 6:34:57 PM PDT by
martian_22
(God what a gullible race.)
To: Truth666
My post 68:
Four or five fossil species were wrong because most lists [link]
now say there were more? No wonder the post was confusing. I botched the link!
Intended this, but actually this web page is a better example of a list of species. The executive summary:
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson