Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hooked on Rush
BitPig Online ^ | 2003.10.10 | BitPig (B-Chan)

Posted on 10/10/2003 4:42:38 PM PDT by B-Chan

Popular radio show host Rush Limbaugh revealed today that he is addicted to illegally-obtained prescription painkillers and is entering a rehabilitation program for substance abusers.

His supporters have “rushed” to defend their idol, running around clucking about how this is really all no big deal. Well, I’m sorry to say, it is a big deal, and the legions of Rush Limbaugh devotees are just going to have to deal with the pain. It’s always devastating to find out your idol has feet of clay. “Say it ain’t so, Joe!”

I, however, am not among the breast-beaters and sackcloth-wearers who are crying in the streets over their toppled god. Frankly, I never understood what was so great about the Rush Limbaugh program. The man was a self-admitted entertainer, not a real political thinker; his brand of rubber-chicken, Chamber-Of-Commerce conservatism has as much to do with historic and traditional conservative thought as Coors Light has to do with real beer - they contain the same basic ingedients, true, but one is watered down for easy-drinkin’ smoothness, with no bitter intellectual aftertaste.

(Speaking of Coors Light, why was it that so many of the good ol’ boys that called in to Mr. Limbaugh’s show with their “cawmints” seemed to be drywall contractors cellphoning from their pickup trucks while driving home to Lewisville? Limbaugh’s listeners were good people, mind you, but not the deepest thinkers in the world.

Not that there‘s anything wrong with that. My point is that Mr. Limbaugh’s show was meant as mass entertainment, not serious politics.)

I guess one reason I never got hooked on Rush (to make a bad pun) was that his fan base kind of freaked me out. Cults-of-personality just make me feel weird. The frenzied worship many of Limbaugh’s fans showed towards him in public was positively embarrassing at times: behavior on the level of the kids who wear Star Trek uniforms to school or spend hours writing elegies in Elvish for fallen Glorfindel of Rivendell. In sci-fi terms, Rush Limbaugh was the Gene Roddenberry of American conservatism, with his own brand of Trekkies; it must be a bummer to realize that the Great Bird of the Galaxy is just another Hollywood sleazebag like everyone else in showbiz

The problem is that people have a natural tendency to make their heroes into larger-than-life supermen, and in so doing they set themselves up for inevitable disappointment. Limbaugh is not the political genius his followers see him to be — he is a showman. I agreed with a good bit of what Mr. Limbaugh had to say on the few occasions when I tuned in to his show over the years, but it was obvious to me from the beginning that most of it was pure schtick, complete with sound effects, zingers, and catchphrases. (The latter were the most cringeworthy; I always found talk of “el Rushbo”, the ”Maharushi”, and the “Golden Microphone” to be intensely stupid, and his constant talk of “excellence” conjured up images of the kind of profound Mission Statements one sees plastered on the walls of companies run by sleazy go-getters. “SlimeCorp — Maximizing Excellence!” Give me a break!)

Anyone who took Limbaugh seriously has got to be hurting right now; finding out that anti-drug Rush is a closet pill-popper has gotta be like finding out that Art Bell doesn’t really believe in the Chupacabra. I feel for his fans — but I hope they’ve learned the lesson in all this: all men are flawed; never get too excited about any one man.

My prayers go out to Mr. Limbaugh’s loved ones. May God grant him a speedy recovery, and may those who looked upon him as more than human finally get the message.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Unclassified; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: eib; limbaugh; maharushie; rush; rushlimbaugh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 281-284 next last
To: B-Chan
Since when is elitism a bad thing? Elitism is a thoroughly conservative philosophy. Egalitarianism (the belief in human equality, as in “liberty, equality, fraternity”) is the ideal of the revolutionary liberal Left, not the traditionalist conservative Right.

POST OF THE YEAR!!!

This is the truth that dare not speak it's name.

You nailed it, by God.

Let the Freeple bleat.

101 posted on 10/10/2003 5:23:40 PM PDT by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
I see your ad hominem and I raise you a strawman and a vanity.

Your call.

102 posted on 10/10/2003 5:23:47 PM PDT by AmishDude (Note tongue. 'Tis inside the cheek, onct.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Jonathon Spectre
why was it that so many of the good ol? boys that called in to Mr. Limbaugh?s show with their ?cawmints? seemed to be drywall contractors cellphoning from their pickup trucks while driving home to Lewisville? Limbaugh?s listeners were good people, mind you, but not the deepest thinkers in the world.

What are the odds this sanctimonious blabbermouth would be living under a nest of branches and dirt without the people who actually make the world we live in. I'm willing to bet money this MF couldn't build a doghouse in three tries.

103 posted on 10/10/2003 5:25:34 PM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
And considering that you couldn't differentiate when the tongue was firmly planted in cheek and when the thinking got serious, I have to place you among them.

Ah, so it wasn't an isolated incident. It happened to me, too.

104 posted on 10/10/2003 5:25:38 PM PDT by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
it must be a bummer to realize that the Great Bird of the Galaxy is just another Hollywood sleazebag like everyone else in showbiz

Rush didn't lie, he didn't commit adultery, he didn't commit perjury, he didn't rape, he didn't grope, he didn't cheat. He wasn't even hypocritical -- because his point has always been that people can't help themselves around certain drugs and thus usage of such drugs has to be restricted.

Rush was taking painkillers because he is in enormous physical pain from botched back surgery. This is somewhat different than using drugs for recreational purposes. May the writer of this piece never have to lay awake at night for years on end, unable to sleep because of the constant agony. But maybe a few months of such torment would cause him to be less inclined to belittle the behavior of those who have endured such physical trial.

105 posted on 10/10/2003 5:25:58 PM PDT by JoeSchem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChadsDad
"...careful of the common folk."


What he means is we are not effite, smarmy, elitists like the dems.

Remember, dems RULE, conservatives LEAD.

106 posted on 10/10/2003 5:26:32 PM PDT by lawdude (Liberalism: A failure every time it is tried!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ChadsDad
Sure. But, I was posting to a sad pup who said that Rush's personal struggle was a setback to conservatism.

That kind of shallow thinking trips my trigger.

107 posted on 10/10/2003 5:26:51 PM PDT by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
Rush Limbaugh is a popular entertainer. He is not a political thinker

NOT!!! He is one of the ALL TIME GREAT Political thinkers who has influenced this entire country!! He knows that.....we ALL know that , like it or not! I am not condoning getting hooked on prescription drugs, but that doesn't make his political knowledge WRONG.

108 posted on 10/10/2003 5:26:55 PM PDT by pollywog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Maurice Tift
These Rush threads are getting boring.
The same 'ol Rush bashers and Bush bashers are having their attention fix. Maybe they're addicted.
109 posted on 10/10/2003 5:28:45 PM PDT by concerned about politics (Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
Limbaugh’s listeners were good people, mind you, but not the deepest thinkers in the world.

Hi B-Chan... it's GeekDejure here...

I'm a Rush lovin' Theep Dinker!!!

So... why don'tcha trash me too???

.

110 posted on 10/10/2003 5:29:53 PM PDT by GeekDejure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o
“B-Chan: Since when is elitism a bad thing? Elitism is a thoroughly conservative philosophy. Egalitarianism (the belief in human equality, as in “liberty, equality, fraternity”) is the ideal of the revolutionary liberal Left, not the traditionalist conservative Right.”

POST OF THE YEAR!!!

This is the truth that dare not speak its name.

Why, thank you, Don-O.

111 posted on 10/10/2003 5:30:07 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
Precisely...Cheap strawman and a vanity.

If I had to talk political economy, I'd rather talk with the drywall contractor, as opposed to some Harvard Yard pseudo-intellect.
112 posted on 10/10/2003 5:30:50 PM PDT by Lee_Atwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: JoeSchem
From one JOE to another...

BRAVO!

113 posted on 10/10/2003 5:31:00 PM PDT by JOE6PAK ("Time is a great teacher, but unfortunately it kills all its pupils."-Hector Berlioz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: GeekDejure
Hi B-Chan... it's GeekDejure here...

'm a Rush lovin' Theep Dinker!!!

So... why don'tcha trash me too???

Because I don‘t waste time trashing anybody.

114 posted on 10/10/2003 5:31:11 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
These Rush threads are getting boring.

Suggestion: Don't click on 'em. Some of us have had a busy week of actual work. I like this thread to get caught up.

115 posted on 10/10/2003 5:31:17 PM PDT by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3
What are the odds this sanctimonious blabbermouth would be living under a nest of branches and dirt without the people who actually make the world we live in. I'm willing to bet money this MF couldn't build a doghouse in three tries.

Dear Mr. Gunslingr3:

Please review the Forum Rules regarding ad hominem posts.

Sincerely,

B-Chan

116 posted on 10/10/2003 5:33:31 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
"....his brand of rubber-chicken, Chamber-Of-Commerce conservatism has as much to do with historic and traditional conservative thought as Coors Light has to do with real beer..."

Uhhh, do you have any specifics or are you just doing some au priori arm waving in order to crow a bit?

Of course, you have a right to your own opinions, but they are only your opinions.

117 posted on 10/10/2003 5:34:08 PM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
"Further, by his addiction to vice, he has damaged conservatism immeasureably."

You wish! If and when the liberals begin their full attacks on Rush, watch conservatism come to his aid! You see, we too know of some bad deeds liberal politicians have done and getting in their faces to remind them of this will be most enjoyable for me!!!!
118 posted on 10/10/2003 5:35:57 PM PDT by Arpege92
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ChadsDad
LIAR,LIAR,LIAR,LIAR,LIAR

Sorry i was excited happy now ? Ive been listening to Rush for 13 years these people make me sick they are scum!

So i wonder who changed the original thread from what it was to what it is now? HMMMMMMMMMM

119 posted on 10/10/2003 5:36:12 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
Strawmen are not forbidden here on FR. Vanities are; if you think this post qualifies as a vanity, please notify the Admin Moderator.

By the way: a sincere apology is generally considered the best followup to one’s own ill-considered ad hominem attack.

120 posted on 10/10/2003 5:36:33 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 281-284 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson