General Shelton is 100% right about the size of the Army. Unfortunately, although it is the largest service, it has the smallest budget overall & has a much, much smaller procurement budget than the other services. And procurement dollars are the basis of contracts & jobs in congressional districts. However unneeded more attack subs and fighter planes are, they will get priority over the much more necessary, but non-glamorous and non-pork producing expansion of Army force structure.
Note Clark's response to Shelton's earlier comments on his character.
To: All
|
The page cannot be found
|
The page you are looking for might have been removed, had its name changed, or is unavailable. |
Please try the following:
- If you typed the page address in the Address bar, make sure that it is spelled correctly.
- Open the www.freerepublic.com home page, and then look for links to the information you want.
- Click the Back button to try another link.
- Click Donate to help support the best site on the web. Face it, you don't want to sit down to start freeping someday, only to see...
HTTP 404 - File not found
|
2 posted on
10/10/2003 10:12:05 AM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: mark502inf
As always, the Active Army types ignore the Army Reserve and Army National Guard when counting troops. Reserve component soldiers cost about 1/3 of what active forces cost and units can generally be deployed with little more effort than would be required for a comparable active unit.
Your humble servant...
3 posted on
10/10/2003 10:18:27 AM PDT by
RebelBanker
(Deo Vindice)
To: mark502inf
Here is a novel idea: how about not being the world's police under the guise of "protecting our interests"... which is what caused 9-11-01 and will be the cause of the next horrific terrorist tragedy.
Doesn't anyone ever read the Constitution anymore? Doesn't anyone understand the meaning of "entangling alliances"?
4 posted on
10/10/2003 10:19:53 AM PDT by
bc2
(http://www.thinkforyourself.us)
To: mark502inf
Note Clark's response to Shelton's earlier comments on his character.I note that Clark is trying to sound the "bigger man," but I've met Shelton twice, once when he still head of the JCS and again after he had retired. From what I've seen of Clark, he doesn't hold a candle to the honesty and integrity of Hugh Shelton.
To: mark502inf
although it is the largest serviceIsn't the Marine Corps the largest armed service???
I think Marine numbers go around 600.000
6 posted on
10/10/2003 10:33:22 AM PDT by
El Conservador
("No blood for oil!"... Then don't drive, you moron!!!)
To: mark502inf
I think that the politicians are starting to see why grunts will always be the backbone of the military. IMHO, the Army needs to be expanded by about 50% to about 750,000 active duty members.
9 posted on
10/10/2003 10:49:18 AM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: mark502inf
We need to reduce the number of troops in Western Europe and let the EUROS take care of Bosnia and other hot spots in their own backyard, reduce our numbers in SHAPE, South Korea and Japan. Japan and South Korea have enough forces to take care of themselves.
To: mark502inf
A couple of thoughts:
Divisions are no longer the operational focuse - it's now Brigades.
The active army need at least 6 more combat brigades, reserves need 10 more combat brigades.
Marines need 3 active / 6 reserve
At least to keep up with the current mission.
12 posted on
10/10/2003 10:59:37 AM PDT by
taxcontrol
(People are entitled to their opinion - no matter how wrong it is.)
To: mark502inf
Does FR have a poll function (besides overwhelming other people's, I mean)? Im curious how folks here feel re:Be Larger vs. Do Less.
19 posted on
10/10/2003 11:56:36 AM PDT by
Maurkov
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson