Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army Must Be Larger Or Do Less, Says Ex-Joint Chiefs Head
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette | October 4, 2003 | By Jack Kelly, Post-Gazette National Security Writer

Posted on 10/10/2003 10:11:17 AM PDT by mark502inf

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
General Shelton is 100% right about the size of the Army. Unfortunately, although it is the largest service, it has the smallest budget overall & has a much, much smaller procurement budget than the other services. And procurement dollars are the basis of contracts & jobs in congressional districts. However unneeded more attack subs and fighter planes are, they will get priority over the much more necessary, but non-glamorous and non-pork producing expansion of Army force structure.

Note Clark's response to Shelton's earlier comments on his character.

1 posted on 10/10/2003 10:11:17 AM PDT by mark502inf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

The page cannot be found

The page you are looking for might have been removed, had its name changed, or is unavailable.

Please try the following:

  • If you typed the page address in the Address bar, make sure that it is spelled correctly.
  • Open the www.freerepublic.com home page, and then look for links to the information you want.
  • Click the Back button to try another link.
  • Click Donate to help support the best site on the web. Face it, you don't want to sit down to start freeping someday, only to see...


HTTP 404 - File not found




2 posted on 10/10/2003 10:12:05 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mark502inf
As always, the Active Army types ignore the Army Reserve and Army National Guard when counting troops. Reserve component soldiers cost about 1/3 of what active forces cost and units can generally be deployed with little more effort than would be required for a comparable active unit.

Your humble servant...
3 posted on 10/10/2003 10:18:27 AM PDT by RebelBanker (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mark502inf
Here is a novel idea: how about not being the world's police under the guise of "protecting our interests"... which is what caused 9-11-01 and will be the cause of the next horrific terrorist tragedy.

Doesn't anyone ever read the Constitution anymore? Doesn't anyone understand the meaning of "entangling alliances"?
4 posted on 10/10/2003 10:19:53 AM PDT by bc2 (http://www.thinkforyourself.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mark502inf
Note Clark's response to Shelton's earlier comments on his character.

I note that Clark is trying to sound the "bigger man," but I've met Shelton twice, once when he still head of the JCS and again after he had retired. From what I've seen of Clark, he doesn't hold a candle to the honesty and integrity of Hugh Shelton.

5 posted on 10/10/2003 10:22:52 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater (Where's the money, Lebowski?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mark502inf
although it is the largest service

Isn't the Marine Corps the largest armed service???

I think Marine numbers go around 600.000

6 posted on 10/10/2003 10:33:22 AM PDT by El Conservador ("No blood for oil!"... Then don't drive, you moron!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador
Marine Corps is the smallest of the 4 major services. When I got out in 1994, I believe we were in the process of scaling back to 155,000 from about 175,000. Quite small, really.
7 posted on 10/10/2003 10:35:50 AM PDT by Justin Thyme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: El Conservador
Isn't the Marine Corps the largest armed service??? I think Marine numbers go around 600.000

There are about 175,000 in the Marine Corps. Your 600,000 number is probably based on the number of photographers & press officers they take with them.

8 posted on 10/10/2003 10:41:34 AM PDT by mark502inf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mark502inf
I think that the politicians are starting to see why grunts will always be the backbone of the military. IMHO, the Army needs to be expanded by about 50% to about 750,000 active duty members.
9 posted on 10/10/2003 10:49:18 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RebelBanker
Two problems with your comments on the reserves. First, although your cost & deployment figures are OK for simple organizations like truck companies or quartermaster units, combat arms units need extensive training prior to employment. Single functional combat arms units like ADA or GS artillery are next up on the scale. Reserve Component organizations designed to conduct combined arms combat maneuver warfare ned lots & lots of training to get to a level of equivalence with active forces.

Second, the guys in the guard & reserves are in there for a reason. If they wanted to be full time, they'd be in the Regular Army. They don't mind being called up for the occasional long term deployment or for a national emergency, but back to back to back routine deployments is not what they bargained for

10 posted on 10/10/2003 10:50:54 AM PDT by mark502inf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mark502inf
We need to reduce the number of troops in Western Europe and let the EUROS take care of Bosnia and other hot spots in their own backyard, reduce our numbers in SHAPE, South Korea and Japan. Japan and South Korea have enough forces to take care of themselves.
11 posted on 10/10/2003 10:58:56 AM PDT by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mark502inf
A couple of thoughts:

Divisions are no longer the operational focuse - it's now Brigades.

The active army need at least 6 more combat brigades, reserves need 10 more combat brigades.

Marines need 3 active / 6 reserve

At least to keep up with the current mission.
12 posted on 10/10/2003 10:59:37 AM PDT by taxcontrol (People are entitled to their opinion - no matter how wrong it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mark502inf
Yes. The Marine Corps does like to document our inevitable victories.

By the way, the Corps just retired the last truck the Army abandoned when they fled from the Chosin Reservoir.
13 posted on 10/10/2003 11:02:44 AM PDT by IGOTMINE (He needed killin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol
The current mission will wind down, unless there is a large scale war imposed on Iraq from one of its neighbors. There are also three National Guard brigades on the way to Iraq to replace regulars by next Jan/Feb.

This is all a temporary condition.

That said, the Army could withraw a brigade at least from the 2nd Div in Korea.
14 posted on 10/10/2003 11:11:38 AM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bc2
Doesn't anyone ever read the Constitution anymore? Doesn't anyone understand the meaning of "entangling alliances"?

No profit in minding your own business. You can't expect the countries that have resources to continue to prop up the Fed without a boot on their throats.

15 posted on 10/10/2003 11:12:21 AM PDT by steve50 ( Democracy is a form of religion; it is the worship of jackals by jackasses. -- H.L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: buwaya
I think that those troops in Korea will stay right where they are, at the very least.
16 posted on 10/10/2003 11:14:09 AM PDT by BushMeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mark502inf
I agree with your second point, but will contest your first. My old National Guard infantry brigade (3rd of the 29th) trained at JRTC on a regular basis and consistently ranked in the middle or (usually) top third of the units that went there. This included mostly active army units.

The "need for extensive additional training prior to deployment" has been a constant argument by active army advocates against the Guard. Usually, this is followed by a request to cut combat arms units in the Guard and increase them in the active Army.
17 posted on 10/10/2003 11:38:13 AM PDT by RebelBanker (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RebelBanker
My old National Guard infantry brigade (3rd of the 29th)

The Blue & Gray; proud unit--landed at Normandy on D-Day and fought all the way across Europe. At the risk of raising a ruckus, the 29th is arguably the best division in the National Guard.

18 posted on 10/10/2003 11:56:35 AM PDT by mark502inf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mark502inf
Does FR have a poll function (besides overwhelming other people's, I mean)? Im curious how folks here feel re:Be Larger vs. Do Less.
19 posted on 10/10/2003 11:56:36 AM PDT by Maurkov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IGOTMINE
I bet they got lots of pictures.
20 posted on 10/10/2003 11:58:36 AM PDT by mark502inf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson