Startling Study Says People May Be Born Gay

Yahoo! News ^ | October 6, 2003 | Amanda Gardner

[El Conservador]

yes, you may be gay even if you don't know it!!! (/sarcasm)

[Support Free Republic]

Your Donation Helps Counter These Guys
	Donate Here By Secure Server Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794 or you can use PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!

[Russell Scott]

Another lie straight out of the pit of hell.

[WackyKat]

Already posted hours ago.
Along with many bible-thumping replies

[Maelstrom]

Once again they have assumed causality when it is not necessarily apparent.

I have no doubt in my mind that participation in homosexual behavior has a physiological and neurologicaly impact. It is quite likely that those changes will be discovered in the brain and in neurological responses.

This disease, whether learned or congenital can still be cured through treatment.

[ETERNAL WARMING]

They can search all they want and they won't find it...like that infamous "missing link."

[donmeaker]

I always thought that human behavior was complicated, and could not be classified by a single variable. Expecially, since there is no difference on one of their scales, that should throw the whole thing down the drain.

One wonders what would be measured if someone picked a "bisexual", or a non-sexual child, or even a "post sexual" old person.

I suppose one could measure all these good things for blacks, whites, browns, orientals, amerinds, dogs, cats, chickens, sheep, horses, Jews and Goyim.

and then, you would still not know anything. Who says that with a sample size of only 59 college students, you are not measureing something else.

All the lesbians I ever met had been sexually abused. I would not doubt that their startle response would be different. The brain changes in response to past experience. A period of nervousness would lead to an enhanced startle response.

As good as their theory.

[TomServo]

Already posted here.

[pierrem15]

In any case, it's irrelevant: a child may be born with no legs or a taste for human flesh.

Neither of these conditions is "natural" in human beings, and these idiots don't know the difference between the effects of violence on nature and nature itself.

[xzins]

already posted; duplicate

[LiteKeeper]

INTREP - SODOMITE ALERT

[GeronL]

That is fallacious... fallatio?

Its all wrong.

[max_rpf]

Tmrw we will have to watch them rolling over the other way... They cannot get pinned down on either 'genetic' or 'behaviour' because one could be cured, and the other could be shunned.

I am fine with either, I just wish one of these explinations was imposed on them so we can go about our business and begin ignoring them again.

[First_Salute]

What a "startling" dilemma for pro-abortion "rights" "advocates."

Sooner than you might think, they will begin testing babies (formerly, politically correct "fetuses") in the womb to find which are gay --- AND THEN "THE LEFT" WILL BAN ABORTING THE "GAY" BABIES ... while "normal" abortions will "naturally" be permitted, even "empowered."

[Coeur de Lion]

There may be a genetic basis for homosexuality which is not limited by the "The Law of Natural Selection"; i.e. the genetic trait for male homosexuality falls on the X chromosome which is solely inherited from the female. There may be some biological basis such as levels of certain hormones such as testosterone or estrogen present during the pregnancy. And there may be amble environmental drivers as a result of the attempt at the normalization and acceptability of homosexual behavior. I believe that's why it's not a black and white issue.

There's probably amble genetic predispositions which exist for alcoholism, pedophilia, obesity etc. but we don't consider them normal behaviors or acceptable. The only alcoholic who thinks drinking alcoholically is normal is with respect to the fact that for an alcoholic it is normal. And all recovering alcoholics find it unacceptable.

The case with homosexuality has nothing to do with "orientation". The issue is one of behavior and that's always been the case--even from a theological perspective!

[jammer]

While it's difficult to make generalizations about gay behavior on the basis of these findings

Isn't that the damned truth? So why do they make such a deal over it?

[punster]

Sexual orientation may not be genetic in origin. However, there is considerable evidence of congenital factors. Examples:

1. Rat experiments. Pregnant female rats were dosed with cyproterone acetate, a potent androgen blocking agent. When the drug was given during the period of fetal development corresponding to brain and central nervous system development, the male offspring exhibited female mating responses.

2. Girls that are born with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. The condition exposes the female fetuses to excess androgens during gestation. The incidence of lesbianism is increased among these girls.

3. Women that have androgen insensitivity syndrome. They are genetically XY (male) in their chromosome count. They do not respond to androgens (testosterone). They have female external genitals and they have a female sex drive and identify as women.

4. Women that have gonadal agenesis, Swyer's syndrome. They have an XY (male) cromosome count. However because of a defective SRY section of the Y chromosome, they do not develop testes. Because there is no testosterone or muellerian inhibiting hormone, they develop female external genital structure and they also develop a uterus, but no ovaries. They see themselves as women and have female sex drives. Medical literature reports that one of these women bore a child (in vitro fertilization of a donated ova and artificial implantation within the uterus).

The presence or absence of testosterone is the key to external genital development and development of sexual orientation and gender identity.

[thegreatbeast]

Wackjobs!

[Dan Evans]

Interesting thing about this is the reversal of the attitude on the left that genetics can influence behavior. Used to be they claimed that differences in behavior, like the differences between men and women, were all nurture. By presenting homosexuality as genetic they must figure they have legitimized special group status for the limp-wristed set.

[Ruth A.]

Tell that to all the "homos" who became such while incarcerated. Lots of choice in the matter, eh? How about those preyed upon by pedophiles?