Posted on 09/26/2003 12:00:31 PM PDT by StoneColdGOP
There is no argument about the serious condition of our once golden state. Our debt is greater than all the other states combined, we are but a few million dollars away from bankruptcy. Our tax burden and over regulations are driving business out of the state at an unprecedented rate.
We are at a crucial point in our state’s history. The people themselves; Democrat, Republican and Independents, without the approval or help from any party have called for an election to recall this governor and replace him with another, one who will hopefully lead us out of this mess.
There appears to be a wide agreement on the first question; should we recall Governor Davis. The second part, choosing a new governor, will not be difficult for most Democrats: theirs is a party line vote with only one candidate, Lt. Gov. Bustamante. And even though he said he will raise taxes and further regulate and tax business, forcing more of them to leave, they will vote for him.
For Republicans however this election is about more than which Republican we should vote for. This election is more about the party itself; will we continue to be a party of principle, directed by the philosophy of Lincoln and Reagan or have we laid our principles aside? Do we want to win so badly that it doesn’t matter how or who, just so the next governor has an R behind his name?
The GOP has two candidates: Arnold Schwarzenegger, a celebrity of worldwide fame, with popularity and fame as the Terminator and recognized as a super star among movie idols. He is a good man. His celebrity status alone will attract a huge number of votes for the GOP from Independents, Democrats and especially young voters. Among the 18 to 30 year olds, he is Britney Spears with muscles. They wow over him. Most moderate Republicans and many regular Republicans, those who desperately want a Republican to win, will vote for him. They are prepared to look beyond his political beliefs and character; they just want to win.
Sen. McClintock, on the other hand, is an icon among Republicans. Since the first day he was elected to office, nearly twenty years ago, he has led the fight against the very forces and policies that have now badly tarnished this once golden state. He fought Governor Wilson’s huge tax increase, just as hard as he fought Willie Brown and Gray Davis. His credentials, as well as his character as a conservative Republican, are impeccable.
He has been our party’s leader and severest critic of fraud, corruption and waste in state government. From the very beginning of his career until today, he has warned that unless spending was brought under control, California would end up as it has today.
The knock on McClintock is that he can’t raise the money and so, can’t win this election. The knock on Schwarzenegger is that he is not a true Republican and carries a lot of baggage that the Democrats will probably throw at him just before the election.
Actually, Arnold is no higher in the polls than he was when he started, whereas McClintock has risen from an asterisk to double digits.
In the last election, McClintock was outspent 30 to 1, yet he received more votes than any other other Republican on election day. Had those moderates claiming Tom can’t win today contributed to his election, or given him his fair share of the money donated by the national party, he would have won. McClintock lost the Controller’s race by the slimmest margin in history. Had he been helped by the moderates controlling our state party, California would not now be in the awful mess in which we find ourselves today.
The moderates of the party and most of the GOP congressmen are just where they were prior to the last Governor’s race. On orders from the White House and Karl Rove, many "conservative" congressman support Schwarzenegger, just as they endorsed the moderate Richard Riordan.
The moderates in our party, including the New Majority and those in the Lincoln Club, are intensely interested in electing Schwarzenegger, a moderate. They believe the party’s future, especially in California, is to adopt the Karl Rove/Parsky plan; we must forgo the values of the liberals and accept the invasion of illegals, adopt the big tent, tax and spend and big government philosophy of the Democrats.
Conservatives know that our party’s losses in California, all during the past decade, are due to millions of illegals who have entered California, and – the continued split in our party between the moderate, "Country Club" Republicans and the conservatives.
While Arnold has a high rating in the polls, it has never risen above where it started. McClintock on the other hand has been continually rising, from as asterisk to double digits. There is a cry from moderate Republicans and "concern" from the media that McClintock should withdraw in favor of Arnold, else the GOP might not win and the dreadful Bustamante will become governor.
This dilemma among the GOP might not be so tragic or apocryphal if the contest was between two conservatives, say Simon and McClintock, one would drop out when just before the election the other was ahead. The same can be said if the two Republicans were Arnold and some equally famous, moderate movie star, but it isn’t.
It’s between our brightest Republican star, a conservative icon and a dazzling celebrity. Conservatives at the core of the party are incredulous at those moderates who don’t share those core values, yet are asking the conservative standard bearer to drop out. Conservatives want to win but they know that a win that asks us to repudiate our principles is not a victory, it’s a harbinger of the end.
Lieutenant Colonel Gil Ferguson, USMC (Ret.), served in the California State Assembly from 1984 to 1994.
What isn't true ? The fact that he is too far right for the average California voter ? Please tell me what CA statewide office holders there are that is as conservative as Tom is ?
First, Reagan is a once in a lifetime politician. If McClintock had 1/10 of the charisma Reagan had we wouldn't be talking. Second, I doubt even Reagan would get elected today in CA. They are much farther left than when Reagan was gov.
I don't mean to be contentious, but when has the CA GOP ever gone for the long play? They haven't. Hell, when did they last gain an inch? There may be examples out there, but most gains have been made by the initiative system we have here.
Look, you let slip your moorings on the right and the only thing thats gonna happen is you'll drift to the left.
Whats more, I think the difference between your's & my view of the electorate is you think they're ideology static, and I think they can be swayed. All it takes is someone willing to unapologetically LEAD. This is what is so frustrating.
The RINO part seems applicable assuming the GOP still stands for conservative principles. The other two are inane, I agree.
I'm supporting McClintock because he represents what I believe in more closely than Arnold. If he urges me to vote for Arnold, I likely will.
If I believe that my single vote will sway the election to Cruz I will vote for Arnold. If I think Arnold is going to win, I will vote for Tom.
I will have it both ways, dammit!
The California GOP is running to the Left. If it continues, this party will stop running conservatives altogether.
If you were the coach of a football team using your logic, every play you would make would be throwing for a touch down pass because trying to gain one yard at a time is compromising your principles ? Thats nuts.
You're not understanding... If this were a football game, Arnold's team is trying to score by running first downs in the opposite team's direction. McClintock is trying to score, but the line of scrimmage gets moved closer to the rival team's end zone.
Okay. Your standing on the ship labeled Principled-Titanic. Please explain how your principled stand will yield results except to lose?
No, California is the Titanic, and Arnold supporters want us to jump onto another ship that just happens to be sinking more slowly.
Correct, and neither does Tom McClintock.
I'd pay to see that...
Who's more principled...
...the man who espouses and fights for everything we say and believe here on FR
...or the man who agrees with him but would vote for him only if he were in the lead?
If it were race between Schwarzenegger and McClintock, your question would be relevant. If it were a race between the two, I would vote for McClintock, and then hope that my low estimate of his character was not accurate.
But it's not. It's a race between Schwarzenegger and Bustamante.
Out of Bustamante and Schwarzenegger, which candidates' opinions on the issues most closely resemble yours?"
How much? What about if I just choke, turn blue, and have to be hospitalized?
I guess the star power of the Hollywood liberal in the race just overwhelmed a majority of "conservatives".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.