Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For the GOP, it's More than a Recall
Lt. Col. Gil Ferguson, USMC (Ret.)

Posted on 09/26/2003 12:00:31 PM PDT by StoneColdGOP

There is no argument about the serious condition of our once golden state. Our debt is greater than all the other states combined, we are but a few million dollars away from bankruptcy. Our tax burden and over regulations are driving business out of the state at an unprecedented rate.

We are at a crucial point in our state’s history. The people themselves; Democrat, Republican and Independents, without the approval or help from any party have called for an election to recall this governor and replace him with another, one who will hopefully lead us out of this mess.

There appears to be a wide agreement on the first question; should we recall Governor Davis. The second part, choosing a new governor, will not be difficult for most Democrats: theirs is a party line vote with only one candidate, Lt. Gov. Bustamante. And even though he said he will raise taxes and further regulate and tax business, forcing more of them to leave, they will vote for him.

For Republicans however this election is about more than which Republican we should vote for. This election is more about the party itself; will we continue to be a party of principle, directed by the philosophy of Lincoln and Reagan or have we laid our principles aside? Do we want to win so badly that it doesn’t matter how or who, just so the next governor has an R behind his name?

The GOP has two candidates: Arnold Schwarzenegger, a celebrity of worldwide fame, with popularity and fame as the Terminator and recognized as a super star among movie idols. He is a good man. His celebrity status alone will attract a huge number of votes for the GOP from Independents, Democrats and especially young voters. Among the 18 to 30 year olds, he is Britney Spears with muscles. They wow over him. Most moderate Republicans and many regular Republicans, those who desperately want a Republican to win, will vote for him. They are prepared to look beyond his political beliefs and character; they just want to win.

Sen. McClintock, on the other hand, is an icon among Republicans. Since the first day he was elected to office, nearly twenty years ago, he has led the fight against the very forces and policies that have now badly tarnished this once golden state. He fought Governor Wilson’s huge tax increase, just as hard as he fought Willie Brown and Gray Davis. His credentials, as well as his character as a conservative Republican, are impeccable.

He has been our party’s leader and severest critic of fraud, corruption and waste in state government. From the very beginning of his career until today, he has warned that unless spending was brought under control, California would end up as it has today.

The knock on McClintock is that he can’t raise the money and so, can’t win this election. The knock on Schwarzenegger is that he is not a true Republican and carries a lot of baggage that the Democrats will probably throw at him just before the election.

Actually, Arnold is no higher in the polls than he was when he started, whereas McClintock has risen from an asterisk to double digits.

In the last election, McClintock was outspent 30 to 1, yet he received more votes than any other other Republican on election day. Had those moderates claiming Tom can’t win today contributed to his election, or given him his fair share of the money donated by the national party, he would have won. McClintock lost the Controller’s race by the slimmest margin in history. Had he been helped by the moderates controlling our state party, California would not now be in the awful mess in which we find ourselves today.

The moderates of the party and most of the GOP congressmen are just where they were prior to the last Governor’s race. On orders from the White House and Karl Rove, many "conservative" congressman support Schwarzenegger, just as they endorsed the moderate Richard Riordan.

The moderates in our party, including the New Majority and those in the Lincoln Club, are intensely interested in electing Schwarzenegger, a moderate. They believe the party’s future, especially in California, is to adopt the Karl Rove/Parsky plan; we must forgo the values of the liberals and accept the invasion of illegals, adopt the big tent, tax and spend and big government philosophy of the Democrats.

Conservatives know that our party’s losses in California, all during the past decade, are due to millions of illegals who have entered California, and – the continued split in our party between the moderate, "Country Club" Republicans and the conservatives.

While Arnold has a high rating in the polls, it has never risen above where it started. McClintock on the other hand has been continually rising, from as asterisk to double digits. There is a cry from moderate Republicans and "concern" from the media that McClintock should withdraw in favor of Arnold, else the GOP might not win and the dreadful Bustamante will become governor.

This dilemma among the GOP might not be so tragic or apocryphal if the contest was between two conservatives, say Simon and McClintock, one would drop out when just before the election the other was ahead. The same can be said if the two Republicans were Arnold and some equally famous, moderate movie star, but it isn’t.

It’s between our brightest Republican star, a conservative icon and a dazzling celebrity. Conservatives at the core of the party are incredulous at those moderates who don’t share those core values, yet are asking the conservative standard bearer to drop out. Conservatives want to win but they know that a win that asks us to repudiate our principles is not a victory, it’s a harbinger of the end.

Lieutenant Colonel Gil Ferguson, USMC (Ret.), served in the California State Assembly from 1984 to 1994.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: mcwampum; recall; tommcclintock
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 381-392 next last
To: KellyAdmirer
Hey, Co is my first choise if bustie is elected!
221 posted on 09/26/2003 2:06:16 PM PDT by TJC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper
1. The French wing who can't wait to wave the white flag on conservative principles every election

May I borrow that? It's so...appropriate.

Of course! Borrow away.

222 posted on 09/26/2003 2:07:01 PM PDT by djreece (Conservative first, Republican second)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: TJC
It's beautiful here. Stay away from Denver, though, it's much nicer in the smaller towns.
223 posted on 09/26/2003 2:07:32 PM PDT by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
*sign*

pro·jec·tion ( P ) Pronunciation Key (pr-jkshn) n. The act of projecting or the condition of being projected.

In Psychology.

- The attribution of one's own attitudes, feelings, or suppositions to others: “Even trained anthropologists have been guilty of unconscious projection of clothing the subjects of their research in theories brought with them into the field” (Alex Shoumatoff).
- The attribution of one's own attitudes, feelings, or desires to someone or something as a naive or unconscious defense against anxiety or guilt.

224 posted on 09/26/2003 2:07:38 PM PDT by pgyanke (We wouldn't have to fight our War on Terror if Islam would take out its own trash!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
No, most of the McC supporters on this particular thread are small, angry, little men. I left out "self-righteous."

Aw, don't go away mad...;)

225 posted on 09/26/2003 2:08:34 PM PDT by skeeter (Fac ut vivas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: KellyAdmirer
Appeasers? LOL, if you view every compromiser or non-doctrinaire conservative as an "appeaser," you must have REALLY despised Ronald Reagan!

I guess you're really putting that guy from post #5 in his place, then, too:

Assuming the U.S. Supreme Court overturns the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and puts the California recall election back on track, and state Sen. Tom McClintock stays in the race, Republicans will have to choose between expediency and principle Oct. 7. At the moment, expediency is leading in the polls.

Yeah, KellyAdmirer, that Reagan speechwriter guy Doug Gamble must have really despised RR! He was probably another one of those DU plants for Busta!

LOL! ;-)

226 posted on 09/26/2003 2:08:53 PM PDT by SteveH ((Californians for, like, you know, Moon Unit!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
He's a conservative because he supports gun control (except for his security detail...)

He's a conservative because he supports abortion rights (whoops!)

He's a conservative because he opposes Prop. 54 (must be an oversight)

He's a conservative because he wants to bring people together (except those "right wing crazies" who make up the bulk of the Party he says he belongs to)

He's a conservative because he wants to cut spending (unless the money is for the children, ANY children, no matter where they were born!)
227 posted on 09/26/2003 2:09:09 PM PDT by StoneColdGOP (McClintock - In Your Heart, You Know He's Right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: StoneColdGOP
ARNOLD - RINO (Rhino In Name Only)

Arnold is going to pleasantly surprise people when he becomes the next governor of California, leading more to the right than most black helicopter nutcases imagine.

228 posted on 09/26/2003 2:09:44 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Thanks, nice being back.

FR seems to have undergone a change. Then again, maybe not...
229 posted on 09/26/2003 2:10:33 PM PDT by StoneColdGOP (McClintock - In Your Heart, You Know He's Right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: SteveH
Yep, I guess I am! I will stand with Bill Simon, the majority of the Californian Republican Congressional delegation, and - yes - Ronald Reagan when I say that electing a moderate Republican is way better than allowing Liberal Democrats to dominate government, as current Californian Republicans regretfully have allowed to happen. :)
230 posted on 09/26/2003 2:13:08 PM PDT by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
Thanks!
231 posted on 09/26/2003 2:13:12 PM PDT by StoneColdGOP (McClintock - In Your Heart, You Know He's Right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Problem is even if a moderate gets nominated then the conservatives vote AIP or Libertarian.

Then the moderates vote Libertarian or Democratic when a conservative is nominated. Its a very ugly cycle.
232 posted on 09/26/2003 2:13:56 PM PDT by Munson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: StoneColdGOP
Most excellent post - and tagline!
233 posted on 09/26/2003 2:14:11 PM PDT by Rabid Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: StoneColdGOP
I've been on FR two years, slick, and been Canadian that whole time.Fancy that!

Unlike you, though, I haven't run off to Liberty Post and told all how much I hate Freepers and think they are all goofs, especially those on a certain thread in the chat section.....Nah, you're not a silly, hyperactive, belligerent hypocrite with an chip on his shoulder, not you son...

You only came back to troll for Tommy, didn't you?
234 posted on 09/26/2003 2:14:48 PM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
Tip O'Neill (though a liberal) had it right when he said, "All politics is local". The national GOP platform is pretty meaningless in California if the majority of voting Californians think that it's too extreme. If you want to lose elections, you can continue to alienate the electorate. If you want the big tent, you have to build one. Why are some Conservatives so thick when it comes to this point?

You are correct. The national GOP platform has nothing to do with it. The CA GOP has its own platform, thank you very much. That is the issue.

Arnold supporters seem not to realize that they are talking to many battle-hardened, in-the-trenches campaign veterans. We know what games are being played here. If the big-money groups that are trying to take the party left succeed, they will do so without our time, money, and votes. We know that they are repeating the mistakes of the past. If they succeed, the Republican party will be in the wilderness for 40 years. But as long as they still can wield their power and influence in the capitol, they could not care less about the California people.

235 posted on 09/26/2003 2:14:53 PM PDT by djreece (Conservative first, Republican second)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
Some of us are looking out for CALIFORNIA, not JUST Bush's chances out here.
236 posted on 09/26/2003 2:16:27 PM PDT by Bella_Bru (For all your tagline needs. Don't delay! Orders shipped overnight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

Comment #237 Removed by Moderator

To: ambrose
Your "always" premise is faulty. Ronald Reagan and George Deukmejian were strong conservatives, who won statewide against liberal opponents

That's a good point. I had forgotten about Deukmejian.

I guess this is my question - if Arnold stays in the race, does McClintock have a chance of winning? If McClintock stays in the race, does Arnold have a chance of winning?

I don't have a dog in this fight, but since Davis has led California's economy into the toilet, thereby depressing the national economy, I'd like someone other than Davis-Lite to win. :-)

238 posted on 09/26/2003 2:17:53 PM PDT by TonyInOhio (Remember 9/11: May they rest in peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Bella_Bru
Gee, I am too toots, as I have MONEY invested your state...

239 posted on 09/26/2003 2:19:02 PM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
It seems that an awful lot of Arnold supporters think Arnold would be good because he would help Bush's chances out here. That is a joke of a reason to elect someone as a governor.
240 posted on 09/26/2003 2:21:23 PM PDT by Bella_Bru (For all your tagline needs. Don't delay! Orders shipped overnight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 381-392 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson