Skip to comments.
Ventura against celebrity pal getting the part
The Orange County Register ^
| September 26, 2003
| Keith Sharon
Posted on 09/26/2003 7:44:36 AM PDT by EveningStar
Edited on 04/14/2004 10:06:24 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
ST. PAUL
(Excerpt) Read more at 2.ocregister.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: arnold; arnoldschwarzenegger; california; californiarecall; jesseventura; recall; schwarzenegger; ventura
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: BibChr
IIn #17, you posted:
Your statement: "Principled People won't vote for Arnold because he isn't a 'real' Republican." Now if you are claiming that he actually did a line strike through "real", is your post a lie?
41
posted on
09/26/2003 9:48:22 AM PDT
by
DrewsDad
To: EveningStar
Yeah, right, Ventura. And he's a political jerk too. I'm so sick of Independents or others acting as if they're above the political fray. They're part of it too.
To: BibChr
Your point? My real point is that you are not gaining any converts by attacking people this way. Instead of providing good positive arguments for your side, you are ridiculing others which does nothing to convince the 44% of FReepers leaning toward McClintock.
43
posted on
09/26/2003 10:02:50 AM PDT
by
DrewsDad
To: DrewsDad
My points are easy to understand, if you're willing.
He perverted my post to read, "Principled People won't vote for Arnold because he isn't a Republican."
That is actually TWO lies. I dealt with it at first contentfully. But you can't have a real conversation with a liar.
That's simple enough.
Dan
44
posted on
09/26/2003 10:08:00 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
I've rebutted your idiocy. If pro-gun control, pro-abortion, pro-illegal immagrant political stances are now what it means to be a "Republican", then count me out.
Your attempt to slander those more conservative than you by calling us "scorched-earthers" is reprehensible and was the first shot in this little flame war.
Get over it.
45
posted on
09/26/2003 10:10:26 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: BibChr
So is your post #17 a lie or a mistake?
46
posted on
09/26/2003 10:11:06 AM PDT
by
DrewsDad
To: DrewsDad
Not my post.
Look, if you just want to argue, please, I am asking you -- bother someone else. PLEASE don't pretend to be doing a dialogue when you aren't willing to do what it takes to dialogue.
Dan
47
posted on
09/26/2003 10:12:30 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
You are the one calling someone a liar when you change what they meant by the term "Republican" or judge it by your own standard concerning reasons for supporting one candidate over another. I was just playing your "lie" game with you to prove a point. See my post #43 for my real reason. I respect your opinions but not the tactics you are using.
48
posted on
09/26/2003 10:20:27 AM PDT
by
DrewsDad
To: DrewsDad
Look, you have apparently simply misread. I haven't the time to go back and review what's sitting out there for God and everyone to see. Do it yourself, or drop it, please.
But you're mistaken.
Dan
49
posted on
09/26/2003 10:22:17 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: EveningStar
Join Us
Your One Thread To All The California Recall News Threads!
![](http://members.cox.net/rightstuff/RDThread.gif )
Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin
To: BibChr
Post #11(DeadCorpse):
Scorched-earthers Principled People won't vote for Arnold because he isn't a
"real" Republican. Post #18(BibChr):
Your statement: "Principled People won't vote for Arnold because he isn't a 'real' Republican."
Technically speaking, you modified DeadCorpse's quote, then proceeded to label him as a liar because of your technical definition that a Republican is someone who registers as a Republican instead of a 'real' Republican. Now, was it a mistake or a lie for me to identify your statement as being from post #17 instead of #18?
51
posted on
09/26/2003 10:39:14 AM PDT
by
DrewsDad
To: Windsong
I dont think he was a Seal. He was EOD (explosive ordinance disposal) they are NOT the same thing by ANY stretch of the imagination.
52
posted on
09/26/2003 10:42:16 AM PDT
by
myself6
(Unionize IT?! "I will stop the motor of the world" - John Galt)
To: DrewsDad
I should have dropped "real," so he's saying that Schwarzenegger isn't a Republican, which is a lie, and which I already responded to. So everything I said, including calling him a liar, was absolutely correct and accurate and true, I just left a word in that did not change my point one iota.
And THAT is what you felt you had to waste all my time for?
PLEASE LEAVE ME ALONE.
Did you read that one okay?
Dan
53
posted on
09/26/2003 10:44:37 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: Dead Corpse; BibChr
Time out, folks! LOL!
To: EveningStar
With friends like this.....
However, I'll always like Jesse because of his stand against the Democrats after the Wellstone Funeral-rally. Not only did he walk out on the Funeral-rally but he was on every network slamming their behavior.
To: BibChr
56
posted on
09/26/2003 10:49:34 AM PDT
by
DrewsDad
To: DrewsDad
1 Chronicles 1:1
Get another hobby.
57
posted on
09/26/2003 10:51:44 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
Have a good day Dan(and stop calling people liars).
58
posted on
09/26/2003 10:55:07 AM PDT
by
DrewsDad
To: EveningStar
I would, but I can't stand it when people think that all it takes to be a Republican, is to pop and (R) behind their name. As another FReeper mentioned on a different thread, Ronald Reagans "80% rule" is an excellent litmus test.
Arnold isn't even 80%. He's barely 60% just going by the issues he has posted on his website. Way back when I was in High School, 60% was a failing grade.
Then to be called a LIAR on top of it? Them thar's fightin' words...
59
posted on
09/26/2003 11:05:23 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: DrewsDad
I'll continue never to call someone a liar who isn't a liar. Promise!
60
posted on
09/26/2003 11:08:01 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson