Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US plans to attack seven Muslim states
AlJazeera ^ | 9/22/03 | staff

Posted on 09/22/2003 8:53:27 PM PDT by Mark Felton

US plans to attack seven Muslim states

Monday 22 September 2003, 23:08 Makka Time, 20:08 GMT

Wesley Clark slams plot to attack seven Muslim states after 9/11


Presidential hopeful General Wesley Clark says the White House devised a five-year plan after the 9/11 strikes to attack seven majority-Muslim countries.

A former commander of NATO's forces in Europe, Clark claims he met a senior military officer in Washington in November 2001 who told him the Bush administration was planning to attack Iraq first before taking action against Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia and Sudan.

The general’s allegations surface in a new book, The Clark Critique, excerpts from which appear in the latest edition of the US magazine Newsweek.

Clark says after the 11 September 2001 attacks, many Bush administration officials seemed determined to move against Iraq, invoking the idea of state sponsorship of terrorism, “even though there was no evidence of Iraqi sponsorship of 9/11 whatsoever”.

Ousting Saddam Hussein promised concrete, visible action, the general writes, dismissing it as a “Cold War approach”.

Clark criticises the plan to attack the seven states, saying it targeted the wrong countries, ignored the “real sources of terrorists”, and failed to achieve “the greater force of international law” that would bring wider global support.

"There was no evidence of Iraqi sponsorship of 9/11 whatsoever"

General Wesley Clark

He also condemns George Bush’s notorious Axis of Evil speech made during his 2002 State of the Union address. “There were no obvious connections between Iraq, Iran, and North Korea,” says Clark.

Clark’s culprits

The former NATO commander acknowledges Iranian and Syrian support for resistance groups such as Lebanon’s Hizb Allah and the Palestinian movement Hamas.

“But neither Hezbollah [sic] nor Hamas were targeting Americans,” he writes. “Why not build international power against Al Qaeda?”

Instead, Clark points the finger at what he calls “the real sources of terrorists - US allies in the region like Egypt, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia”.

Clark blames Egypt’s “repressive policies”, Pakistan’s “corruption and poverty, as well as Saudi Arabia’s “radical ideology and direct funding” for creating a pool of angry young men who became “terrorists”.

Clark with wife Gert after naming
himself a presidential candidate

The recent Democrat Party convert says Bush should have adopted a more preventive measures and targeted extremist leaders. “The way to beat terrorists was to take away their popular support,” adds Clark, though he offers little to suggest how this would be achieved.

But White House policy was quickly set in order to achieve particular goals, Clark writes, saying the US administration used the 9/11 attacks to address broader objectives in the Middle East.

Clark, who supervised NATO’s campaign to oust Serbia’s forces from Kosovo in 1999, also takes a swipe at the United States’ allies in Europe, which provided staging bases and planning headquarters for "radical" groups.

War record

The retired general last week declared his intention to win the Democrat nomination to challenge George Bush for the presidency in 2004.

Just days after entering the presidential race, Clark has raced ahead of the nine other Democratic contenders in the latest polls.

Many political observers have portrayed Clark as an anti-war candidate whose own war record – he was decorated after being shot and wounded while serving in Vietnam – means he cannot be accused of lacking courage or patriotism.

Clark has frequently criticised Washington’s policy towards Iraq.

He claimed previously that after the 9/11 attacks, he was pressed by the Bush administration to link the strikes directly to Iraq but refused - a claim the White House denies. However, once the war on Iraq began, he urged decisive action to achieve a rapid US victory.

Despite his anti-war stand on Iraq, the general has had a reputation for being belligerent. He was criticised during the Kosovo campaign for defending attacks on civilian Serbian targets, including the bombing of a television station that left about 20 journalists and other staff dead.

Aljazeera


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2004; wesleyclark
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: Mark Felton
It seems it was always about selling a book.
61 posted on 09/23/2003 4:24:26 AM PDT by OldFriend (DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
"He was criticised during the Kosovo campaign for defending attacks on civilian Serbian targets, including the bombing of a television station that left about 20 journalists and other staff dead."

Outspoken outrage at the accidental deaths of journalists guarantees Weasley a favorable spin in the liberal media.

62 posted on 09/23/2003 4:44:13 AM PDT by LurkedLongEnough (American-American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ntnychik
If it weren't for bad luck, he'd have no luck at all.

Born under a bad sign

63 posted on 09/23/2003 5:31:03 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in groups or whole armies.....we don't care how we getcha, but we will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #64 Removed by Moderator

To: Mark Felton
Presidential hopeful General Wesley Clark says the White House devised a five-year plan after the 9/11 strikes to attack seven majority-Muslim countries.
Probably a contingency plan. The military undoubtedly has plans for attacking Mexico, Brazil, Canada, Israel, France, Japan, and California. They've always done this.

-Eric

65 posted on 09/23/2003 6:00:51 AM PDT by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Presidential hopeful General Wesley Clark says the White House devised a five-year plan after the 9/11 strikes to attack seven majority-Muslim countries.

If President Bush already has a five year plan in place for this then why would we need Clark?

I saw the list and I agree with the countries on it. Save Saudi Arabia for last, once we conquer and convert the rest of the islamic world to Christianity there will be less 'arab street' type loonies to deal with when we destroy medina and that hunk of stone they worship in mecca. Give Pakistan back to India where it belongs and let them deal with that problem.

Once again President Bush has it planned out correctly.

66 posted on 09/23/2003 6:16:40 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
This is quintessential Clark aka Clinton. He will sell out the county's strategic war plan and put our intel operators and soldiers at risk for personal gain.


67 posted on 09/23/2003 6:25:48 AM PDT by TADSLOS (Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SevenDaysInMay
"Recall this 4-star and order him to lead the charge deep into the Sudan-Somalia borderlands. He could then be the poster boy for the "Army of one" ad campaign. He should pose before he deploys. "

Bwahaha, Rush or Sean should use this.

68 posted on 09/23/2003 7:31:08 AM PDT by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Instead, Clark points the finger at what he calls “the real sources of terrorists - US allies in the region like Egypt, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia”.

Clark is right. Saudi Arabia is culprit. Why not on list?

69 posted on 09/23/2003 7:43:58 AM PDT by Alter Kaker (Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Didn't the war in Iraq take less time than the attack in Waco?
70 posted on 09/23/2003 7:47:47 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Given that these nations are incapable of governing themselves, this make perfect sense.
71 posted on 09/23/2003 8:07:26 AM PDT by Rockitz (After all these years, it's still rocket science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235
"Let the mayhem begin!"
72 posted on 09/23/2003 8:50:50 AM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
"Yep. Clark will be Hillary!'s running mate."

Bet he can't wait to hear her say to him the first time, FU soldier boy.
73 posted on 09/23/2003 9:13:21 AM PDT by billhilly (Nominate Big Al Sharpton for fearless behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
Sadly, Robert, I believe you are right. I'm not looking forward to the next campaign.
74 posted on 09/23/2003 10:09:54 AM PDT by EggsAckley (......................whatever...................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Imal
For that, and for the Prescription Drug Benefit, of course.


that was funny... roflmao
75 posted on 09/23/2003 10:22:13 AM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (robert the rino...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
I have a hard time believing anything Wussly "I'm sorry I didn't start WWIII in Kosovo" Cluck says.
He's pretty much been cut out of the loop, and has no real contacts inside the decision making machine.
His contacts that do exist are Clinton cronies who are likely guilty of espionage and treason if what he said is the actual plan.
He has no security clearance anymore.
And being given classified info on military plans, and then blabbing about it, constitutes treason.

If the info is correct, then we ferret out his contacts and charge them with espionage. Then we charge Cluck with as much as we can for his effort to obviously harm our goals.
76 posted on 09/23/2003 10:44:48 AM PDT by Darksheare (It's all part of a vast Rightwing Tagline Conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Very good. I believe you have figured out the Hillary game plan.

Clark will only be the VP if he survives the next month. He will probably self-destruct soon, so there will be a new plan. Probably involve Lieberman.

77 posted on 09/23/2003 10:58:56 AM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson