Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US plans to attack seven Muslim states
AlJazeera ^ | 9/22/03 | staff

Posted on 09/22/2003 8:53:27 PM PDT by Mark Felton

US plans to attack seven Muslim states

Monday 22 September 2003, 23:08 Makka Time, 20:08 GMT

Wesley Clark slams plot to attack seven Muslim states after 9/11


Presidential hopeful General Wesley Clark says the White House devised a five-year plan after the 9/11 strikes to attack seven majority-Muslim countries.

A former commander of NATO's forces in Europe, Clark claims he met a senior military officer in Washington in November 2001 who told him the Bush administration was planning to attack Iraq first before taking action against Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia and Sudan.

The general’s allegations surface in a new book, The Clark Critique, excerpts from which appear in the latest edition of the US magazine Newsweek.

Clark says after the 11 September 2001 attacks, many Bush administration officials seemed determined to move against Iraq, invoking the idea of state sponsorship of terrorism, “even though there was no evidence of Iraqi sponsorship of 9/11 whatsoever”.

Ousting Saddam Hussein promised concrete, visible action, the general writes, dismissing it as a “Cold War approach”.

Clark criticises the plan to attack the seven states, saying it targeted the wrong countries, ignored the “real sources of terrorists”, and failed to achieve “the greater force of international law” that would bring wider global support.

"There was no evidence of Iraqi sponsorship of 9/11 whatsoever"

General Wesley Clark

He also condemns George Bush’s notorious Axis of Evil speech made during his 2002 State of the Union address. “There were no obvious connections between Iraq, Iran, and North Korea,” says Clark.

Clark’s culprits

The former NATO commander acknowledges Iranian and Syrian support for resistance groups such as Lebanon’s Hizb Allah and the Palestinian movement Hamas.

“But neither Hezbollah [sic] nor Hamas were targeting Americans,” he writes. “Why not build international power against Al Qaeda?”

Instead, Clark points the finger at what he calls “the real sources of terrorists - US allies in the region like Egypt, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia”.

Clark blames Egypt’s “repressive policies”, Pakistan’s “corruption and poverty, as well as Saudi Arabia’s “radical ideology and direct funding” for creating a pool of angry young men who became “terrorists”.

Clark with wife Gert after naming
himself a presidential candidate

The recent Democrat Party convert says Bush should have adopted a more preventive measures and targeted extremist leaders. “The way to beat terrorists was to take away their popular support,” adds Clark, though he offers little to suggest how this would be achieved.

But White House policy was quickly set in order to achieve particular goals, Clark writes, saying the US administration used the 9/11 attacks to address broader objectives in the Middle East.

Clark, who supervised NATO’s campaign to oust Serbia’s forces from Kosovo in 1999, also takes a swipe at the United States’ allies in Europe, which provided staging bases and planning headquarters for "radical" groups.

War record

The retired general last week declared his intention to win the Democrat nomination to challenge George Bush for the presidency in 2004.

Just days after entering the presidential race, Clark has raced ahead of the nine other Democratic contenders in the latest polls.

Many political observers have portrayed Clark as an anti-war candidate whose own war record – he was decorated after being shot and wounded while serving in Vietnam – means he cannot be accused of lacking courage or patriotism.

Clark has frequently criticised Washington’s policy towards Iraq.

He claimed previously that after the 9/11 attacks, he was pressed by the Bush administration to link the strikes directly to Iraq but refused - a claim the White House denies. However, once the war on Iraq began, he urged decisive action to achieve a rapid US victory.

Despite his anti-war stand on Iraq, the general has had a reputation for being belligerent. He was criticised during the Kosovo campaign for defending attacks on civilian Serbian targets, including the bombing of a television station that left about 20 journalists and other staff dead.

Aljazeera


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2004; wesleyclark
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: DoughtyOne
Yep. Clark will be Hillary!'s running mate.

By announcing now, he accomplishes 2 things. 1) He takes the wind out of Deans sails and prevents him from establishing an unsurmountable lead; and 2)He begins putting together THE national campaign organization that must be in place for Hillary! to run later, if she chooses.

In 4 months+ if Bush looks vulnerable, Clark will turn over the keys to the Campaign organization and the Saudi inflated bank vault to Hillary! and he'll be her VP running mate.


[you heard it here first]
21 posted on 09/22/2003 9:07:43 PM PDT by Mark Felton ("All liberty flows from the barrel of a gun")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235
I agree.
22 posted on 09/22/2003 9:08:05 PM PDT by ex-Texan (Read Sun Tzu: The Cold War Never Ended)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
#2 or #7 ??
23 posted on 09/22/2003 9:08:41 PM PDT by AdamSelene235
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Darn it's just Hitlery'sClark's propaganda. I had my hopes up there a minute!
24 posted on 09/22/2003 9:09:21 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Right Wing Crazy #5338526)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
With these folks I don't think anything close to this is far fetched.
25 posted on 09/22/2003 9:14:54 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave
If this is a policy that he heard in his official capacity, I'd think he would be in trouble. What a comment to come up with in public...
26 posted on 09/22/2003 9:16:27 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
White House devised a five-year plan after the 9/11 strikes to attack seven majority-Muslim countries.

Seven ? It should be 22 plus china and north korea ....

This guy reminds me WAY TOO much of Hitler.

27 posted on 09/22/2003 9:18:33 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (Islam : totalitarian political ideology / meme cloaked under the cover of religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Bush administration was planning to attack Iraq first before taking action against Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia and Sudan.

If only it were true.

28 posted on 09/22/2003 9:19:06 PM PDT by TheOtherOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
"His job was only to take the wind out of Dean's sails. Mission accomplished already. "

I think you are right. Pretty amazing how calculating the Clintons are.

29 posted on 09/22/2003 9:20:38 PM PDT by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All
either the dumbs are in trouble, or america is in trouble.
30 posted on 09/22/2003 9:20:55 PM PDT by genghis (lessons from vietnam according to ann)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
A former commander of NATO's forces in Europe, Clark claims he met a senior military officer in Washington in November 2001 who told him the Bush administration was planning to attack Iraq first before taking action against Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia and Sudan.

I wonder if this is the same administration official who called him to pressure him to make claims about Iraq before the war...that Clark later said was actually an independent think tank in Canada...that after a little investigating appears to not exist...

This guy Clark truly is a fool. Crap like this will kill him in the general election if he gets that far. He is trying to lie like Clinton...but can't seem to pull it off...fortunately for the country I suppose.

If his statement is true, which I severely doubt, well, he is committing treason it seems to me.

That's the modern Democrat party. A lying would be traitor is the moderate candidate...though I guess, as unlike Dean, he hasn't personally killed an unborn child he won't be extreme enough for the party as a whole...
31 posted on 09/22/2003 9:21:14 PM PDT by swilhelm73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
why do we have to stretch it out over 5 years? lets's speed
this puppy up.
32 posted on 09/22/2003 9:23:52 PM PDT by isom35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Note to Bush Administration: Don't forget Yemen.
33 posted on 09/22/2003 9:24:47 PM PDT by Dec31,1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Clark, who supervised NATO’s campaign to oust Serbia’s forces from Kosovo in 1999, also takes a swipe at the United States’ allies in Europe, which provided staging bases and planning headquarters for "radical" groups.

What goes on inside that 'brilliant' mind? Was he not a driving force behind crinton's Serbian bombing strategy? A strategy that supported the KLA, another muslim narco-terrorist organisation with ties to Al-Queda?

I wonder what his idea of "radical" groups is???

34 posted on 09/22/2003 9:28:43 PM PDT by ohmage (918-222-7241)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Join Us At Today's Iranian Alert Thread | DoctorZin

Click on the link above!

"If you want on or off this Iran ping list, Freepmail DoctorZin”


35 posted on 09/22/2003 9:35:27 PM PDT by DoctorZIn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Attacking seven islamic states infested with terrorist savages? Sounds like a good plan to me!
36 posted on 09/22/2003 9:39:41 PM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Let's give General Clark the Al Jezeera vote.

Birds of a feather...

37 posted on 09/22/2003 10:07:49 PM PDT by Taiwan Bocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
This is most odd. Is Clark really going to run on an invade Pakistan, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia plank? Even if he's just proposing publicly putting these countries on the poopy list he's walking into a pretty sticky thicket.

All these countries call for a more nuanced policy than Iran, North Korea, and Iraq. Are we going to be upgrading our opinion of Iran and North Korea or are we going to start isolating these other countries. How exactly does he get the help of Pakistan in tracking down terrorists?

Weird.
38 posted on 09/22/2003 10:19:52 PM PDT by MattAMiller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
All Wesley Clark needs to do is nominate Scott Ritter as his potential running mate and he will win the democratic nomination.

As far as I'm concerned, If Clark made the statement that the White House is planning to invade 7 Muslim nations, he should be arrested and taken to GITMO

39 posted on 09/22/2003 10:24:05 PM PDT by MJY1288 (Who Would the Terrorist Vote For ??????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Felton
Weasely Cluck is really helping in the War on Terror.
40 posted on 09/22/2003 10:29:36 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Por La Raza Mierda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson