Skip to comments.
Gen. Clark: Saddam Not a Criminal
NewsMax.com ^
| 9/21/03
| Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
Posted on 09/21/2003 8:37:32 AM PDT by kattracks
In a little noticed interview with Fortune Magazine last week, presidential frontrunner Gen. Wesley Clark defended Saddam Hussein against charges that he was engaged in crimes against his own people at the time the Iraq war started, contending instead that the Iraqi dictator should have gotten a pass because his atrocities took place ten years ago.
Asked why it was right for President Clinton to use military force to halt Slobodan Milosevic's crimes against humanity in Kosovo, but not for President Bush to do the same thing against Saddam, Clark said that in Iraq, "The imminence of stopping a guy from committing a crime in progress - it wasn't there."
"In Kosovo you had ethnic cleansing actually unfolding, and we had intervened to stop it," the ex-NATO commander insisted, without commenting on the torture chambers, rape rooms and mass graves discovered in Iraq by coalition forces.
Instead, the Democratic frontrunner suggested that the Iraqi dictator deserved a pass by outlining what Fortune described as Clark's "Statute of Limitations for Genocidal Thugs."
"It was ten years ago that Saddam brutalized the Shiite Muslims in the south," he argued. "And he used chemical weapons 15 years ago."
Instead, said the retired military man, Saddam brutality was really no worse than crimes committed by leaders in China more than a decade ago, telling Fortune:
"We still deal with communist China, right? During the Cultural Revolution they had cannibalism in China. And the same guys that ran over the students in Tiananmen, they're still there."
Fortune writer Bill Powell pointed out, however, that while China is still a police state, "the recently departed General Secretary Jiang Zemin, to take but one example, was promoted from mayor of Shanghai to succeed Deng Xiaoping in part because he avoided bloodshed during Tiananmen. . . . Have you ever heard of Saddam promoting someone because he avoided killing somebody?"
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
2004 Elections
Saddam Hussein/Iraq
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2004; 2004election; balkans; civilrights; dummycrat; election2004; humanrights; kookyclark; limbacher; prodictator; prosaddam; rat; saddamite; usefulidiot; warcrimes; wesleyclark
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 181-187 next last
To: cookcounty; PISANO
Yes, I want the details too. Clark was among the youngest when he was selected for BG...with 22 years service.
101
posted on
09/21/2003 11:55:20 AM PDT
by
Wolverine
(A Concerned Citizen)
To: A. Pole
Thanks for the clarification. I also saw some more details on another thread, "Clinton welcomed as hero in Kosovo" (sorry I don't know how to post a link). The whole affair is stomach-turning, to say the least.
Some of the truly oddest twisting of truth I have seen comes from the "anti-war" left, who would have us believe that Bush and every other Republican are war-mongers by default, while they have absolutely no problem with Klintoon's massive and mostly unjustified (or outright wrong) use of the military. Klintoon actually ordered more military actions than the previous 3 or 4 presidents combined.
102
posted on
09/21/2003 12:00:18 PM PDT
by
exDemMom
(Michael Jackson for Governor!)
To: palmer
There was an exodus of Kosovars after we started bombingI had forgotten. Thanks for the reminder.
103
posted on
09/21/2003 12:01:53 PM PDT
by
exDemMom
(Michael Jackson for Governor!)
To: kattracks
Barrack Emporer Wastely Clark has his Patricia Murray (D-Microsoft) moment.
104
posted on
09/21/2003 12:02:03 PM PDT
by
.cnI redruM
(There are two certainties. Death and Texas.)
To: Destro
Be afraid---be very afraid. Is Clark running for anti-Christ?This guy has sent a continuous chill up and down my spine since the first time I heard him speak.
In the version I've heard, the anti-Christ wins the election. You're damn right I'm afraid.
To: I_saw_the_light
I only read the story on Clark. It chilled me to the core.
106
posted on
09/21/2003 12:13:01 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
(DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
To: dighton
That's the article. How chilling. The man is truly insane.
107
posted on
09/21/2003 12:13:43 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
(DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
To: SSN558
It is my understanding that Ann Richards asked Reno for a waiver of the posse commitatus act. She acquiesced and Clark, in charge of Ft. Hood supplied the tanks and personnel.
108
posted on
09/21/2003 12:16:15 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
(DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
To: woofie
"Fluorides?"
I think Generalissimo Weasley 'flies the black helicopters', as he monitors the 'contrails' program.
You realize, of course, that fluoridation impacts one's precious bodily fluids like nothing else; luckily, we've got the Generalissimo on the case!
109
posted on
09/21/2003 12:19:30 PM PDT
by
headsonpikes
(Spirit of '76 bttt!)
To: Spruce
LOL
To: ChadGore
Bring this maroon on!
To: SSN558
In the case of the Waco massacre, the executive branch of government in charge of enforcing Posse Comitatus became the violators. We have a constitutional mechanism for dealing with this situtation and it is called impeachment.That may be so but the potential exists for thousands of US citizens to be murdered by our own government before having to answer any charges.
It's my understanding that Posse Comitatus can only be suspended during a declared National emergency.
But then Clinton thought of himself as omnipotent and looking back, for all practical purposes, was.
112
posted on
09/21/2003 12:24:46 PM PDT
by
Vinnie
To: idkfa
Wait, I'm confused. Is it Ramsey or Wesley running for president? exactly my point.
To: Vinnie
It's my understanding that Posse Comitatus can only be suspended during a declared National emergencyYou are probably right, but then wasn't the clinton presidency a national emergency?
Oh, yeah. It was never "declared" such!
If guys like Clark can sweep to the front of the pack in Dem politics, its just more proof that the whole democratic party is a corrupt organization.
114
posted on
09/21/2003 12:36:19 PM PDT
by
Don Carlos
(El que no le gusta vino es un amimal.)
To: kattracks
Does the voting military sector know about these statements?
115
posted on
09/21/2003 12:36:28 PM PDT
by
maxwell
(Well I'm sure I'd feel much worse if I weren't under such heavy sedation...)
To: maxwell
Does the voting military sector know about these statements? Betcherass we do!!
116
posted on
09/21/2003 1:01:24 PM PDT
by
Old Sarge
(Serving You... on Operation Noble Eagle!)
To: dighton; OldFriend
I would have been a Republican, Clark told them, if Karl Rove had returned my phone calls. This shouuld make the Democrats a bit uneasy...The strangest thing of all is to see Bruce Lindsay and all the Clinton pals on his team....Whats up with that?
117
posted on
09/21/2003 1:07:34 PM PDT
by
woofie
To: woofie
Psychopaths, ALL.
118
posted on
09/21/2003 1:08:45 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
(DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
To: woofie
The strangest thing of all is to see Bruce Lindsay and all the Clinton pals on his team....Whats up with that? Control, and the clintons have it.
To: ChadGore
....when an american shills for a deposed socialist dictator ? it's known as being a good democrat!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 181-187 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson