Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/10/2003 6:25:13 PM PDT by yonif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: yonif

2 posted on 09/10/2003 6:26:45 PM PDT by Registered (Gray Davis won't be baaaaahhck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yonif
Another pizza party in Temecula?
3 posted on 09/10/2003 6:27:08 PM PDT by EggsAckley ((o;/>~......................bemused.........................~</;o))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yonif
McClintock on H&C(Says He's Still In, Its Early, But Will Back Arnie if Otherwise Cruz Would Win)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/979993/posts
4 posted on 09/10/2003 6:27:12 PM PDT by Ex-Dem (Anti-Quagmire Alert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yonif
Yes, it was really enlightening that he said he'd never drop out to keep Cruz or Grey out of office even if he were 20 points behind Arnie right before the election.

A real leader doesn't hand the office he hoped to win to the enemy if it lookes like he cant win it for himself after all. I'm not bringing McClintock's name up as a viable candidate anymore.

11 posted on 09/10/2003 6:43:29 PM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yonif
Ahnold cannot debate...because English is a second language to him...
and everybody knows it.....His inability to speak (apart from a well rehearsed script) would be his downfall among more skillfull english speakers...he would appear foolish..

Which is of course unfair....but given Ahnolds ruthlessness in prior competitions..would be also be a good comeupance

While debate does for the most part favor the glib...it is still a good way to bring
the issues of the day in front of the public and learn of the candidate's stances

Regardless..Ahnold is not conservative on the important issues..but will claim to be in order to get elected - imo

He has reversed himself and taken McClintock's views on the issues McClintock has raised..Ahnold knows these are the things real conservative are concerned with..
and wants those votes...needs those votes..

after elected..imo... he will go the way of the liberal that he is and those he hangs with...

Of course the other choice is Bustamante....basically screwed either way..

Ahnolds entry into this election instead of his supporting McClintock pretty much proves he isnt as concerned with Ca. conservatism or the Republican Party.. as he is ..his own "lifetime achievment" imo

If Ahnold was real he would be campaigning for Tom instead of himself

14 posted on 09/10/2003 6:47:41 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yonif
McClintock uses the term "social issues" because he doesn't want to offend any more voters than he can help. But it's clear enough what he means.

Arnold is fervently in favor of killing babies.

Arnold would support the march of gay rights and probably cave on such issues as gay marriage.

In addition, as McClintock says more explicitly, Arnold would cave on raising taxes.

The Republican pros have put forward a whole series of RINO losers in California, and they continue to drive away their own voting base. Maybe they should look at the last election, where the pro-life position was a winner in almost all the races. Arnold won't draw a single pro-abortion vote with his pro-abortion position, because these folks always vote Democrat no matter what.
23 posted on 09/10/2003 6:55:51 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yonif
Bottom line is this. NOBODY is entitled to a vote.

If Cruz wins, it's not because so and so didn't drop out. It's because Arnold or TomM couldn't get the other votes. Instead of Ahnold's backers whining about Tom, maybe they need to go out and tell Arnold's crew to earn the backing of McClintock backers by supporting the right policies.

And on the same note McClintock should be getting his word out as well. Arnold is not ENTITLED to the votes of the other backers, and neither is McClintock for that matter.

This sense of entitlement is ridiculous.

26 posted on 09/10/2003 6:58:51 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("Our party will never be the choice of the NRA" - John F. Kerry, who looks French)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yonif
And what if, hypothetically, you unnestan, he had been hired by the RATS to do this?! A sleeper RAT, in other words.
29 posted on 09/10/2003 7:07:17 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Go ahead, make my day and re-state the obvious! Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yonif
"But McClintock told Fox News he doesn't need Schwarzenegger to pursue these changes and said Schwarzenegger's most popular budget ideas where his in the first place"

Bwahahahahahaha

My toys and you can't play with them.

As if no one has ever thought of these basic conservative ideas. What a load.
31 posted on 09/10/2003 7:09:18 PM PDT by Weimdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yonif; PhiKapMom; justshe
Ok, I'll throw something out for comment that I noticed yesterday following Ueberroth's drop from the election.

The lamestream news was saying that McClintock should likewise drop out, otherwise he would be Arnold's spoiler, thus causing BustaMEChA to be elected.

Now, we all know that the lamestream media is controlled by the Left, particularly in California where it is the official propaganda machine of the Demoncratic Party. So why would they be wringing their hands over McClintock spoiling Schwarzenegger's campaign and BustaMEChA winning?

Question to Arnold supporters: is the light coming on yet?

This is the CA Demoncrat machine trying to select the candidate they want to face in the recall (just like the Dems did in the last election). McClintock has a real message, has real solutions, and has real experience. I also doubt that the Dems have any dirt they can use to smear McClintock (which is the Dems favorite campaign tactic). On the other hand, the Dems know that Schwarzenegger is just riding on his star power. He may be popular in the polls due to his name recognition, but will that be enough to energize people to go to the polls and vote for him? I suspect not. Furthermore, it is obvious that the Dem dirt machine is going to unload heaps of crap on Schwarzenegger late in the campaign (after getting McClintock to drop out, if they can) to further suppress Arnold's poll popularity.
32 posted on 09/10/2003 7:09:44 PM PDT by SpyGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yonif
Looser!
33 posted on 09/10/2003 7:09:44 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Go ahead, make my day and re-state the obvious! Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yonif
I heard McQuixote on Hannity's radio show and, while I agree with him on many issues, he really turned me off. He sounded like every other politician and couldn't bring himself to remember Ronald Reagan's 11th commandment: Thou Shalt Not Speak Ill of Another Republican.

I did not like what I heard. Too arrogant, to much Me Me Me. All he's going to do is ensure MeChA MeChA MeCha.

I'm a native Californian. As much as I agree with the conservative positions, his tone is just unelectable in California. Folks, the moderates will never vote for him, and you just can't win in California without the independent 'moderate' vote. That's been true since the early 1960's and it's what killed Knowland in '58 against Pat Brown, Nixon in '62 against Pat Brown, worked for Reagan in '66 and '70, for Junior Brown in '74 and '78, etc., on through Davis last year.

Doesn't anyone on FR have any perspective on California politics over the past 50 years? The lack of understanding is amazing. Conservatives in California have been shooting themselves in their feet for decades. And Tom McQuixote is just the latest one. Sad.

34 posted on 09/10/2003 7:11:42 PM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo [Gallia][Germania][Arabia] Esse Delendam --- Select One or More as needed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yonif
Some lesser-known talkers (Hugh Hewitt especially, from what I hear on his show) have truly begun to villify McClintock for not being a good obedient Republican and stepping aside for the Big Ahnuld Machine.

L.A. drive-time chatters John and Ken (http://www.johnandkenshow.com) challenged a caller to go to joinarnold.com/en/agenda and pick out the aspect of Arnold's agenda that he didn't like. The caller seemed to have a hard time, but I didn't: http://www.joinarnold.com/en/agenda/arnoldsviews.php#F1

The man wants the federal government to pay the extra cost of imprisoning illegal aliens in American prisons?! Give me a break! We should "move on" from Prop. 187, which was approved by an overwhelming voter margin then lynched in the courts by a left-wing judge with NO APPEAL?

It is blatantly clear that a vote for either Bustamante or Schwarzenegger is a vote for alien amnesty, which in turn is a vote for more crime, more illegal drugs, poorer schools, more closed hospitals, more disease, further wreckage for the environment, and the continuation of the rapidly accelerating decline in quality of life for all Californians.

If dimbulbs like Hugh Hewitt, John Kobylt and Ken Chiampou would show a little support for the lone candidate capable of doing some true good for the state, rather than being hypnotized by Ahnuld-mania, McClintock would win by a healthy margin.

And it doesn't matter who the governor of California is; the hatred here for George W. Bush is absolutely incredible, and it would take a miracle for him to win this state in '04. Ahnuld alone won't be able to do it for him. Call me a pessimist if you want, but I actually live here and work amongst these socialist morons in L.A.
43 posted on 09/10/2003 7:25:21 PM PDT by longshot1980
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yonif
"McClintock told Fox News he disagrees with Schwarzenegger on a range of social issues and remains deeply suspicious about his commitment to fiscal reforms and holding the lid on taxes."

Arnold Schwarzenegger's views, in his own words:
VOTE TOM McCLINTOCK
44 posted on 09/10/2003 7:26:55 PM PDT by Duramaximus (Freedom Loving American Living In A State That Worships Socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yonif
Arnold may not have a chance of winning if voters make the same mistake on the ballot as one radio caller made. Caller on an LA radio station said he voted for the wrong Schwartz..... Click

Or George B. Schwartzman, the nonpartisan owner of a medical services company in San Diego, who wants junk food removed from public schools.

Test

80 posted on 09/10/2003 8:33:05 PM PDT by Enough is ENOUGH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yonif
He'll quit the race. If a politician says something expect the opposite.
108 posted on 09/10/2003 8:56:54 PM PDT by jwh_Denver (Duct tape is on isle 7 next to the douche bags.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yonif
Join Us…Your One Thread To All The California Recall News Threads!

Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin

171 posted on 09/10/2003 10:46:41 PM PDT by DoctorZIn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yonif
I don't think that McClintock should drop out because the Ds are going to pull a very hard, very nasty, very devestating "late hit" on Arnold, probably the Thursday before the election, and with no McClintock the Rs will not be left with a viable candidate in the race.

So please, do not think that us McClintock supporters necessarily would prefer to fall on their swords than suffer having a left winger representing their party.

And lets carry this one further - maybe it's the Rs supporting Arnold who are being short-sighted. What would you rather have - a clean shot at Cruz in 06, or having to defend the failure that Arnold will become in 06? Better blow it for Arnold now, teach the establishment we will not be taken for granted, and watch the state burn for a few years and elect a true R, than have to apologize for the inevitable deadlock between Arnold and the hippie legislature and march into battle with an aging, no longer novel Terminator in 06? With Cruz as Gov, W might even pick up the state in 04.

So again, before you you go calling McC people stupid, maybe you Arnold sell-outs should reconsider your own position.

187 posted on 09/10/2003 11:15:48 PM PDT by mbraynard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson