Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/03/2003 11:05:07 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/918370/posts
Creator of 'Mr. Sterling' Admits: We TV Writers Are '99% Leftist'
NewsMax.com ^ | 5/27/03 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Professor's Study Shows Liberal Bias in News Media


CyberAlert -- 05/07/1996 -- NQ CyberAlert
... recent Freedom Forum survey of Washington reporters and bureau chiefs revealed 89
percent voted for Clinton versus 7 percent for Bush in 1992. Do you think the ...

Great Debate#9
... opinions skew their professional writing. Nuzzo pointed out that a 1995 Freedom
Forum survey showed 89 percent of the media voted for Bill Clinton while the ...

Break up Microsoft?...Then how about the media "Big Six"? [ ...
... Why? They're usually wrong. 92% voted for Clinton. Libertarians, by contrast,
much enjoy being Right. You may (continue to?) derive your understanding of ...

-Poll confirms Ivy League liberal tilt--

The Politics of Hollywood
Uncommon Knowledge ^ | July 20, 2001 | Peter Robinson
A poll by the Center for the Study of Social and Political Change in 1992, eighty-three percent of film and television writers, directors and producers voted for Bill Clinton. Eighty-three percent. The vote that Clinton received in the country at large, forty-three percent.

No Bias in Media, ha ha, tee hee

2 posted on 09/04/2003 12:14:26 AM PDT by backhoe (Earth First! ( We'll strip-mine the other planets later...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Bravo, Mr. Elder, sir :-)
3 posted on 09/04/2003 1:04:57 AM PDT by Tamzee ("Big government sounds too much like sluggish socialism."......Arnold Schwarzenegger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
C-Span called Ann Coulter a conservative, and you're saying that's bad?
4 posted on 09/04/2003 2:08:36 AM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"If by Liberal", he told me, "you mean open minded, then yes, this is true."

No, Walter-we mean liberal-as in:
useless, irrational, hysterical, incapable-of-logical-thought-process.

If you want the best examples of where media bias does extreme damage, just look at the Iraq war, and Al Jeezera. Media coverage influences world wide perception. Remember those exiled Iraqi's boarding busses in Jordan to go to back Iraq and fight for Saddam? They were stirred into a frenzy by Al Jeezera's slanted coverage of the war- they ended up being toast.

The morale of our troops is directly effected by media bias too. All this "quagmire" coverage and continous negativity in all reports from Iraq. It makes the military's job harder to do. It's tough on their families as well. (The welcome exception is Fox News-They try to include positive stories and they have done some good work in telling people about how difficult it was to rebuild Europe after WW II.)

Imagine if all jouranlists and networks applied Fair and Balanced to how they did their news. There'd be less problems in the world,-I think.

13 posted on 09/04/2003 3:41:21 AM PDT by fly_so_free (Never underestimate the treachery of the democratic party. Save the USA-Vote a democrat out of offic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Here are my thoughts on this subjecxt.

That was an excellent well-written piece by Mr. Elder. I've researched this issue for the last several years and have written numerous letters to the editor on this subject. In fact Brent Bozell just wrote another well-written peice about how journaists continue to hide behind bogus claim of objectivity while serving as lapdogs for the Demorats and attack dogs against Republicians.

This issue does indeed matter because what is at stake here is our rights as conservatives and chrstians to address issues of public importance in public arenas like this one without the fear of retribution or retalation. There are those who look at us as a public health risk to our own communities simply because of what we stand for and the ideas we promote. These people are seeking to criminialize our expression and have us sent to concentrtation and reeducation camps.

How it hurts is because a lot of these people are posing as journalists and hiding behind bogus and false claims of objectivity. These people clearly have malicious and harmful intentions towards us christians and conservatives. These people are not our friends, they are our enemies and if you're going to take up for these sorry bastards, then you're not going to be treated very nicely in conservative or christian circles.

Liberal and progressives points of view DO NOT REPRESENT NEUTRALITY and any news ornganiztion that inisists on presenting the news this way is very highly suspect. If you're going to blow kisses to these news organizations, you go do so on DU, NOT here at FR. As somone once said, the friends of our enemies are our enemies and these news organizations, CNN and the big three are our enemies.
Regards.

16 posted on 09/04/2003 5:11:03 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
bump
18 posted on 12/06/2003 9:51:37 AM PST by rwfromkansas ("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson