Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Sexually Inclusive Christians" Celebrate Victories, Push for More
Institute on Religion and Democracy ^ | Mark Tooley

Posted on 08/30/2003 5:48:16 PM PDT by xzins

"Sexually Inclusive Christians" Celebrate Victories, Push for More

Mark Tooley August 22, 2003

When arguing for church acceptance of homosexuality, most advocates talk about monogamy. But others are bolder.

“I am a strong ally of those in healthy, polyamorous relationships,” declared Debra Kolodny. She argued that having multiple sexual partners can be “holy.” Kolodyn was leading a workshop at the WOW (Witness Our Welcome) 2003 convention, an ecumenical gathering for “sexually and gender inclusive Christians.”

Hundreds of homosexual, bisexual, and heterosexual people gathered under the “queer” banner in Philadelphia August 14-17 to urge religious acceptance of non-traditional sexual behaviors.

According to WOW’s schedule brochure, it was sponsored by the homosexual caucus groups in most mainline Protestant denominations and Dignity USA (for Roman Catholics). Other supporting groups listed in the program included People for the American Way, the Human Rights Campaign, McCormick Theological Seminary (Presbyterian), Episcopal Divinity School, Chicago Theological Seminary (United Church of Christ), and Wesley Theological Seminary (United Methodist).

According to the president of Wesley seminary, Wesley paid a fee for a table with promotional material at WOW 2003. But Wesley did not endorse or give financial support to WOW beyond this fee.

Kolodny, an author and former national coordinator for The National Bisexual Network, was leading a workshop called “Blessed Bi Spirit: Bisexual People of Faith.” Although focusing mostly on bisexuality, Kolodny, who is Jewish, explained that she could not conclude the session without discussing polyamory.

“There can be fidelity in threesomes,” Kolodny said. “It can be just as sanctified as anything else if all parties are agreed.” But she was careful to stress that polyamory is unacceptable “if there is deceit.”

Kolodny said polyamory does not usually involve simultaneous group sex. But there are exceptions, she admitted, as she recalled a friend of hers who shares a bed with his wife and male partner. When asked by a workshop participant how polyamory was different from “recreational sex,” Kolodny responded that consensual recreational sex could be a part of polyamory. But polyamory usually involves some level of commitment and intimacy.

Noting she herself had never been polyamorous, Kolodny explained that as a busy attorney she simply did not have time to conduct the complicated “negotiations” necessary for “holy” polyamory. But she expressed admiration for persons with the time to organize.

Most of Kolodny’s talk was about bisexuality, not polyamory. “I disagree with the queer movement [when it claims] that sexual orientation is predetermined,” Kolodny said, asserting that the existence of bisexuality “challenges all that.”

“I know a lot of women who chose to become lesbian,” Kolodny said. “Love between two people is always beautiful,” she added, and should be regarded as part of free choice.

“I’m not sure we can make the case for genetic predetermination,” Kolodny stressed, saying sexual preference depends on opportunity, support, and spiritual experiences.

Kolodny lamented that the “queer” movement insists on the “party line” of genetic predetermination as part of a “political strategy.”

“The queer movement relies on, ‘We can’t help it. We’re born this way,’ Kolodny said. “It feels so safe. If you don’t say it you’re thrown to the lions and you’re evil.”

She contrasted the insistence on genetic predetermination with the teachings of Judaism and Christianity, which say: “God gives us choices.”

“Free will is essential to our humanity and essential to our being created in the image of God,” Kolodny said. She charged that denying free choice in sex preference was “perpetuating the hetero-patriarchy,” helping the “radical right,” ignoring bisexuality, and making it easier for “hate” to continue.

Rather than creating “absolute poles” of sexual preference, Kolodny said the world includes a wide spectrum of choices. She recalled the hostility of her “dyke” friends when she abandoned her strict lesbianism for bisexuality. Many homosexuals suspect bisexuals of trying to gain the “privileges” of the hetero-patriarchy by seeking sexual partners of the opposite gender.

Another workshop leader who addressed a sexual minority sometimes forgotten by the “queer” movement was the Rev. Erin Swenson, formerly Eric. Swenson is a Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) minister and family counselor whose sex change operation made Swenson the first post-operative transsexual minister in a major denomination.

Swenson was married with children. But after suffering for years from a desire to be a woman, Swenson finally divorced and had the operation. “I don’t recommend that any one become transgender,” Swenson said. “It’s a very painful process.”

“Some people accuse me of not being a woman,” Swenson complained, citing “ultra-feminists.” Swenson prefers being called simply “Erin and a child of God” to any label. “High heels are very uncomfortable,” Swenson playfully admitted.

“Transgender people won’t come to your church unless they truly know they are safe there,” Swenson warned. Even ostensibly “gay” friendly congregations are sometimes not prepared for transgender people. “Get your church to be trans friendly,” Swenson urged. One need is for bathrooms not marked male or female.

Swenson described the United Church of Christ as “miles ahead of anybody” in making itself open to transgender people. The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), in contrast, declined Swenson’s offer to volunteer in the creation of church resource materials for transgender church members.

“Transgendered people threaten communities because they threaten our assumptions,” Swenson concluded. “It is threatening but also freeing.”

Leading a workshop on “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Questioning Issues in the Roman Catholic Church,” Mary Louise Cervone complained that tolerance rather than justice” is the norm in America today. A former president of Dignity USA, Cervone, with her same-sex partner at her side, wondered how many “nameless men and women” must die before this country moves beyond tolerance to freedom for all people.

“Our best hope for change rests not with bishops and the pope but with Catholic people,” Cervone insisted. “Change won’t come form the top down. The Catholic people must demand freedom.

Cervone affirmed her lesbianism as a “gift of God.” She confessed she has a hard time attending the Catholic Church, because the “church is not where we find freedom. It’s where we go to hide.”

“But you can’t kick me out,” Cervone declared defiantly. “Where in religion did we get the idea that some people are more worthy than others?” she wondered.

The Rev. Jorge Lockwood, who is Global Praise Coordinator for the United Methodist Church’s Board of Global Ministries, led a workshop called “Redeeming Our Bodies, Congregational Song as a Path of Liberation.”

“As queer people, we have another way of looking at the body,” Lockwood said. He complained that churches too often are uncomfortable with the human body and suffer from “liturgical constipation.” He observed that too often people think the “desire of a 25 year old gay man for another 25 year old man is a beautiful thing,” but the desire of a 65 year old for a 25 year is “dirty.”

“We have all learned to challenge Romans,” said the Rev. Mari Castellanos, referring to St. Paul’s letter that, among other Scriptures, is critical of homosexual behavior. Castellanos leads the Justice and Witness Ministries of the United Church of Christ. “We must do likewise with all texts that go against our brothers and sisters that are being claimed as the unerring Word of God.”

But Castellanos also urged the WOW 2003 audience to embrace “justice” issues beyond their own. “When we leave this earth, queer bishops won’t matter as much as whether the hungry are fed,” she insisted, to applause.

“This president and this Congress have systematically torn down the social net that sustained all of us,” Castellanos mourned. “We must lobby our government on behalf of the poor of the world. Our experience of exile has taught us compassion.”

Castellanos promised that “we will take on scary proposals such as the Marriage Protection Act. We will turn the tide that threatens to obliterate the social contract.” Echoing the name of a radical homosexual group, she insisted: “We must continue to act-up!”

Rev. Yvette Flunder, a United Church of Christ pastor from San Francisco, celebrated a string of political victories for pro-homosexuality advocates, including the election of an Episcopal Church homosexual bishop, the arrival of legalized same-sex unions in Canada, and the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling against anti-sodomy laws.

“The Holy Ghost can break loose in an atmosphere of injustice and give us more justice in three weeks than many years!” Flunder enthused. “These wouldn’t have been miracles under Bill Clinton!” she exclaimed, citing the irony of pro-homosexuality strides under a conservative government.

The Rev. Troy Perry, founder of the predominantly homosexual Metropolitan Community Churches, asked all the heterosexuals at WOW 2003 to stand and receive applause. “Thank you!!... I know what people do to you,” he told them, saying they pay a price for solidarity with homosexuals.

Perry said he “just got married” to his male partner of 18 years, who has had AIDS for several years. He likened the plight of homosexuals who cannot legally marry to slaves who also had no legal right to marriage.

“I will not give up until every one of us can marry,” Perry insisted, comparing Heaven to attending the WOW 2003 conference.

A brief skit produced for the WOW 2003 audience showed three troubled disciples in a storm-tossed boat. One, a young woman, declares: “I am bisexual and can’t find acceptance in the gay community.” A man says, “I am a 19 year old gay. Or am I queer? And I’m Presbyterian. But I’m not sure what that means!” A third person complains she is age 22 but cannot “find a voice” in the gay community.

Then a figure representing Jesus appears, played by a young woman wrapped in the rainbow flag, which is the emblem of the homosexual movement. “Take heart, it is I,” she says. “Do not be afraid.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; activistcourts; activistsupremecourt; ageofconsent; ageofconsentlaws; antireligion; bisexuality; bisexuals; catholiclist; christianity; christians; churchofsatan; crowley; culturewar; doasthouwill; downourthroats; gaymenschorus; gaytrolldolls; gomorah; groupsex; hedonists; homosexualagenda; homosexuality; homosexuals; ifitfeelsgooddoit; insanity; lawrence; lawrencevtexas; libertines; losttheirway; makeachoice; marriagelaws; mockeryofreligion; offthepath; orgies; orgy; pedophile; permissivesociety; polyamorous; polyamory; polygamy; prisoners; privacylaws; promiscuity; prositutionlaws; religion; religiousleft; samesexmarriage; satan; satanisstrong; serpentinthegarden; sexlaws; sexuality; sin; sinandsinners; sodom; sodomites; sodomy; sodomylaws; teensex; temptation; unrepentantsinners; usualsuspects
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-378 next last
To: Jorge
Nope, it's you that looks like an idiot with a cynical, deliberate misinterpretation of Santorum's remarks, which seems to be based in a perverse urge to expunge moral belief systems from the public shphere, a la ACLU phonies. When you make wild accusations with no facts to back them up, you only damage your own name.
61 posted on 08/30/2003 6:54:33 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Arafat must go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Canada lines up.

:>)
62 posted on 08/30/2003 6:55:06 PM PDT by xzins (In the Beginning was the Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
bleh... "sphere" yada yada
63 posted on 08/30/2003 6:55:11 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Arafat must go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Are you libertarian? Or close to being so?

I guess it depends on the issue.

I am actually a Democrat turned Republican thanks to Reagan, and perhaps partially due to my Christian conversion in my late teens.

I consider myself mostly conservative, but I'm sure many here would disagree with that.

64 posted on 08/30/2003 6:55:27 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator; Jorge; RnMomof7; OrthodoxPresbyterian; CCWoody
I'm waiting for an answer from Jorge. I think he's a libertarian Christian.

Many responses are Christian. Now that I think of it, his political responses are all libertarian.

Libertarian Christian is an extremely difficult balance. It's virtually impossible to be consistent, imho.

Take it easy on him for a while longer.
65 posted on 08/30/2003 6:57:38 PM PDT by xzins (In the Beginning was the Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: At _War_With_Liberals
"They should form a new faith and worhip a bisexual God."

They don't want a new faith. They just want to destroy ours.
66 posted on 08/30/2003 6:57:54 PM PDT by keats5 (We have no King but Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Now, how do they justify this writing of the Apostle Paul to the Corinthians?
Corinth was a place where sex was a form of worship and sex and church went together. Priests and priestesses were there to be done to or be done by according to history. So Paul, who started the church there wrote them this letter.

1 Corinthians 6:13-20

13. "Food for the stomach and the stomach for food"--but God will destroy them both. The body is not meant for sexual immorality, but for the Lord, and the Lord for the body.
14. By his power God raised the Lord from the dead, and he will raise us also.
15. Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ himself? Shall I then take the members of Christ and unite them with a prostitute? Never!
16. Do you not know that he who unites himself with a prostitute is one with her in body? For it is said, "The two will become one flesh."
17. But he who unites himself with the Lord is one with him in spirit.
18. Flee from sexual immorality. All other sins a man commits are outside his body, but he who sins sexually sins against his own body.
19. Do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are not your own;
20. you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with your body.

Seems like the "Sexually Inclusive Church" wants to turn the Apostle Paul's work a 180 degrees and make the "Church" back into the former "Corinth" instead of turning the of Corinthians into a "Church."

67 posted on 08/30/2003 6:58:26 PM PDT by KriegerGeist ("The weapons of our warefare are not carnal, but mighty though God for pulling down of strongholds")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I think the full preterists would have to revise some verses like Isaiah 11:6...

"The wolf also shall dwell with the wolf, and the leopard shall lie down with the leopard; and the calf and the young lion and the fatling polyamorously together..."

(I intentionally left out the 'little child' part...don't wanna go there)

68 posted on 08/30/2003 6:59:16 PM PDT by Frumanchu (mene mene tekel upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
The libertarians I know best consider themselves conservative. With a twist, of course.

69 posted on 08/30/2003 6:59:47 PM PDT by xzins (In the Beginning was the Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Geist Krieger
Amen, Ghost Warrior.

They toss Paul from scripture. While they think I Cor is authentically Paul's, they don't accept Paul's apostleship.
70 posted on 08/30/2003 7:02:06 PM PDT by xzins (In the Beginning was the Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Frumanchu
:>)
71 posted on 08/30/2003 7:03:13 PM PDT by xzins (In the Beginning was the Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Nope, it's you that looks like an idiot with a cynical, deliberate misinterpretation of Santorum's remarks, which seems to be based in a perverse urge to expunge moral belief systems from the public shphere, a la ACLU phonies. When you make wild accusations with no facts to back them up, you only damage your own name.

Give me a major break.

Show me where I misinterpreted Santorum's remarks.
The fact is you can't.

He clearly addressed the issue of privacy when it came to sex between consenting adults in the context of the sodomy case...and warned about the "dangers" of saying adultery and homosexuality were OK.

Now unless he was advocating the sex police busting down the bedroom doors of consenting adults and arresting them for acts of adultery and homosexuality, then his point is moot. And he should have thought before he spoke.

72 posted on 08/30/2003 7:04:14 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: At _War_With_Liberals; CARepubGal
I forget whose theory it is (carepubgal) but she has noticed that these groups go after "hierarchical denominations" that own the property of their member churches. She sees it as an effort to accrue power and wealth and immoral license.
73 posted on 08/30/2003 7:05:44 PM PDT by xzins (In the Beginning was the Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: xzins
The libertarians I know best consider themselves conservative. With a twist, of course.

That twist would be that I disagree with libertarians on these boards on many issues. For example, I am against the legalization of pot and other drugs.
On what issues do you think I am libertarian?

74 posted on 08/30/2003 7:08:56 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Put me on your ping list please.

2 Timothy 3
1   This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.
2   For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,
3   Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,
4   Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;
5   Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.
6   For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts,
7   Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.
8   Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith.
9   But they shall proceed no further: for their folly shall be manifest unto all men, as their's also was.
10   But thou hast fully known my doctrine, manner of life, purpose, faith, longsuffering, charity, patience,
11   Persecutions, afflictions, which came unto me at Antioch, at Iconium, at Lystra; what persecutions I endured: but out of them all the Lord delivered me.
12   Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution.
13   But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived.
14   But continue thou in the things which thou hast learned and hast been assured of, knowing of whom thou hast learned them;
15   And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.
16   All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
17   That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.

75 posted on 08/30/2003 7:15:00 PM PDT by Happy2BMe (LIBERTY has arrived in Iraq - Now we can concentrate on HOLLYWEED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
Santorum v. homosexuality and State v. 10 commandments.
76 posted on 08/30/2003 7:15:01 PM PDT by xzins (In the Beginning was the Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
The point is not moot. It's a powerful, compelling statement on the direction of our culture, just the kind of truth that we say we want to know from our politicians. And if you care for freedom, you should be far more alarmed at yet another "right" being interpreted into the Constitution at the whim of the courts - at least as alarmed as Sen. Santorum, enough to say something about it.

He turned out to be totally correct. Since Lawrence v. Texas we have been buried in a virtual avalanche of homosexual initiatives and propoganda. The attack on the institution of marriage alone has the potential to do grievous damage to this country, to say nothing of the damage that is done to people who are encouraged to pursue their own degradation.

Whether you agree with it or not, the question you ask is within the rights of the States to answer. If they choose to prohibit homosexuality and adultery, it is their right to do so. To attack the entire notion of legislating on those matters runs in contravention with millenia of history. Doing so therefore puts the burden of proof on you to make your case. When you simply spit epithets instead of presenting a reasonable case, your remarks cannot be considered to be rational argument.
77 posted on 08/30/2003 7:16:05 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Arafat must go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Kolodny, an author and former national coordinator for The National Bisexual Network, was leading a workshop called “Blessed Bi Spirit: Bisexual People of Faith.” Although focusing mostly on bisexuality, Kolodny, who is Jewish, explained that she could not conclude the session without discussing polyamory.
_______________

Ok, let's forget for a moment about all of the passages that deal with sexual promiscuity and unnatural sexual behaviors. Do homosexuals believe in idols? Did they ever consider that the fact that they are so focused on their sexuality is perhaps making an idol out of it?

I am so sick of these people, I really am. There seems to be no boundary to the kind of sexual deviancies they are willing to endorse. What is next--a one-night stand is holy and monogamous at least for a few hours? Perhaps a rape is holy in some way? How about child molestation? Sick bastards! What's even more mind boggling is the fact that anyone who does not engage in these activities and calls themselves Christian would agree to it.
78 posted on 08/30/2003 7:17:13 PM PDT by glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Done, H2. Lovers of selves: narcissism is the primary explanation of "homosexual disorder." HD is a form of narcissistic personality disorder.
79 posted on 08/30/2003 7:18:10 PM PDT by xzins (In the Beginning was the Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: xzins
It makes me breathe, "Come quickly Lord Jesus."

Amen! That article just made me want to weep for what is being done to the True Word of God and His Truth. Sometimes it is almost too hard to believe it is happening so fast.

In Jesus alone,
Andra

80 posted on 08/30/2003 7:20:29 PM PDT by lupie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 361-378 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson