[No Dems 2004]

It's just another one of many issues where the Democrats have gotten in a self-destructive mood about.

[FormerLib]

To almost unanimously follow such a radical agenda, the Democrats are simply committing political suicide.

Well then shut the heck up about it before you warn them off this chosen path!

[Polycarp]

If as many as 58% of voters (and probably more) support this amendment, it's clear that there's going to be quite a few Democrats in the House and the Senate failing to represent their constituents if they refuse to support the amendment. Yet, many Democrats from deeply conservative states like the Dakotas, Louisiana or the Carolinas have so far showed themselves unwilling to support something like the FMA, let alone combat the sodomite agenda. Accordingly, many Republicans are discovering a wedge issue that may help disembowel the Democrats in the next election cycle.

Note to the Bush Administration: public, vocal opposition to the homosexual marriage agenda will get you votes. Kowtowing to homosexuals will lose you votes.

Please act correspondingly.

Or don't. If you want to lose your broad base.

[TedsGarage]

Do you really think the sex lives of 2-3% of the population will be the decisive issue in 2004?

[Scott from the Left Coast]

Keep in mind, the Field Poll was in California. These results are completely expected for the west coast. The west coast is as different from the old south, or even the mountain west, as Tahiti is from Greenland.

There is nothing surprising at all about these findings. These are issues that hurt the Democrats badly nationally, but in certain locations, the west coast for example, the Democrats are actually strengthened by positioning themselves this way. The west coast is America's "little France."

[cake_crumb]

And people wonder why McClintock is not likely to win...

[joesnuffy]

Health & Homosexuality

Homosexuals tend to die at an early age 45 yrs and this is among the population who is not infected with HIV...they live with many STDs and the consequences of such infections on their immune systems set them up for death from infections not normally considered fatal in non immune compromised heterosexuals..

To grant them marriage or a legalized domestic partnership imo would allow their "partners" eligibility for health insurance...they will dip into the same funds that normal families need for their children and spouses-

Normal familes being ones that try to eat healthy foods...excercise etc... who do not engage in health endangering activities or lifestyles..familes that do not openly court disease...

The familes of heterosexuals will of course be penalized through higher premiums co payments medicine etc..

Small businesses will be forced to drop health insurance as a perk...employees will have to pony up more and more of their income to subsidize care for patients ill with homosexually transmitted diseases

Familes will be forced to go without health insurance...and pray that nothing catastrophic happens..the result being loss of homes and college funds for their kids..

Nothing good will come of this insanity...it is just one more sign of a decaying culture...and a disgusting one at that

[EdReform]

Bump and ping

Scripter will be off line occasionally between now and the middle of September. I've agreed to help him out by running his homosexual agenda ping list.

Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links

Homosexual Agenda Index (bump list)

Homosexual Agenda Keyword Search

All FreeRepublic Bump Lists

A simple freepmail is all it takes to subscribe to or unsubscribe from scripter's homosexual agenda ping list. If you wish to be added to the list in scripter's absence, please FReepmail me.

[JohnnyZ]

This thread is so gay.

[tkathy]

The pro NAMBLA, anti Boy Scouts, head in the sand, dems.

[Old Professer]

I think they should pass a "means-test"; what does being Gay mean?

[WOSG]

A challenge for ya: Get this printed in any major newspaper!

[INSENSITIVE GUY]

I'm really tired of this phoney saying,"government should'nt be meddling in people's lives"!They would'nt have to if the queers,abortionists,God haters and gun rights violators did'nt PUT IT IN THE GOVERNMENTS HANDS IN THE FIRST PLACE.

[only1percent]

It's not that the Democrats have decided not to represent the present "social issue" majority, but, rather, they've picked a different majority to represent -- the so-called "emerging Democratic majority" of racial/ethnic majorities, hard-core white liberals, and "soccer-mom" type white suburbanites.

Whether the Democrats are right or wrong depends, more than anything else, on whether Republicans can (a) retake the the white suburbanites who were core Republican voters 15 years ago but who are now increasingly Democratic on the basis of cultural affinities, (b) take and solidify a solid majority among Asian voters -- who have no good reason to vote D but still do and (c) bring up Hispanic leaders and otherwise craft messages to keep at least 35-40% of the Hispanic vote.

[Bon mots]

I don't believe polls like this anymore.

Lucky for me I have my trusty "Al Gore Vote Cheater" software.