Skip to comments.
Legal Tragedy for Unemployed Divorced Men & Fathers
Posted on 08/17/2003 2:34:43 PM PDT by ImFightingMad
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 701-703 next last
To: Pukin Dog
*wink*
101
posted on
08/17/2003 4:26:54 PM PDT
by
Neets
To: StatesEnemy
Of course... but until there is a surefire way of discriminating - I'll just stay in non-nuptial "agreements". ,,, won't your income buy that ability to discriminate?
102
posted on
08/17/2003 4:27:56 PM PDT
by
shaggy eel
(Having fun @ 41º 18'S 174º 47'E)
To: nmh
Yes, he could but in the vast majority of cases, it would not even make the slightest bit of difference. Only woman are allowed in most jurisdictions to petition the court for an increase in the amount of support.
The chance of a decrease ever being considered by the current judiciary is less than that of a hailstone in a steel furnace.
103
posted on
08/17/2003 4:28:21 PM PDT
by
rollin
To: ImFightingMad
Move to Kansas. Child support is not enforced in this state. When it is put in a court order, it is only for the minimum wage level (5 kids on less than $300 a month).
To: StatesEnemy
Let me repeat my previous statementon: Post your anti-marriage crap on some other BB, like democraticundergound.com
105
posted on
08/17/2003 4:28:59 PM PDT
by
Mini-14
To: 4Liberty
you are not making sense- the man is on unemployment- nevermind and legal or moral question, it is not logical to throw someone in jail because he cannot do the impossible. (i.e. pay out more than he takes in)
I am not defending deadbeat dads, I have seen to many morons fail to take responsibility for their children. I am just asking how is it 'contempt' for a person to be unable to do the impossible?
106
posted on
08/17/2003 4:29:01 PM PDT
by
Mr. K
(mwk_14059 on yahoo IM - why dont we have a FR chat yet Jim? (i can give you the code))
To: shaggy eel
Well... I don't seem to be lacking.
And my $$$ is MINE! Matter of fact just splurged on a 2K carbon-frame road bike - it's a speed demon.
Meanwhile, 'Married Men' are spending their cash on drapes...
To: Mr. K
From my own experience in the courts, they can make it up as they go!
To: 4Liberty
You should have kept your pants on. Look back at what was written: "I therefore cannot pay the alimony and child support that the courts ordered in my divorce in Florida"
The guy is divorced. Are you saying married people shouldn't have sex???
109
posted on
08/17/2003 4:31:42 PM PDT
by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: ImFightingMad
It sounds like your oldest son should apply for and receive SS disability (or something like that). Has anyone looked into this?
Other than that, you should take your situation to the judge and request a recalculation of the child support and alimony.
Some men get the raw end of the deal in divorce, but in most cases it's the women and children who get the raw end of the deal. That's why the laws are the way they are.
My dad was one of the first dad's to sue for custody and get it, 25 years ago. At the time, my mom was a college student after being a housewife so he didn't get child support. In fact he had to pay alimony. When my mom was finally employable, he was so traumatized by the family court system that he decided not to sue for child support.
To: Mini-14
Let me repeat my previous statementon I'm not "anti-marriage", I am anti-woman-court-collusion.
Until that changes, I refuse to buy into the scam.
To: ImFightingMad
You seem like you may be clinically depressed (for good reason) and are about to do something desperate (like guaranteeing an arrest warrant by not appearing in court). Maybe you should seek psychological help from the state mental health authorities or somewhere. I don't have a lot of faith in psychologists, but perhaps you can get mental disabilty status or something. Tell them you're suicidal (which you've hinted at). Even if it doesn't help your case, it might help your troubled mind. I really don't know if this is a feasable suggestion, but it may be worth looking into. I hope things get better soon. Keep fighting. I've known a few people who've faced equally terrible times and have eventually found light at the end of tunnel. God bless.
To: moondancer
How true, the judges in Family Law do not have to follow the law. Also, you cannot get a trial in front of a jury!
This proves how family law itself is against The Constitution and Bill of Rights!
To: FITZ
I know people who spent thousands on attornies, fought over everything but both ended up with almost nothing... War of the Roses.
Becki
114
posted on
08/17/2003 4:34:27 PM PDT
by
Becki
(Pray continually for our leaders and our troops!)
To: mlmr
Mother worked two jobs to keep body and soul together for her children as they crashed from a 180K income to less than 15 over the course of a year. It sounds to me like he should have been given custody since he was in a better position to support the children than she was.
Thats the problem that many/most men see in the discrimination being practiced by the courts nowadays.
Women, by virtue of their genitalia are superb parents and men are reduced to a pecker and a paycheck. Women are parents and men are just spare parts.
Women are perceived as these perfect beings who by virute of their breasts are perfect, godlike parents and men are all dunces who couldn't raise a child to save their lives.
It's state-supported and sponsored sexual discrimination. Period!
Just remember: Susan Smith was a mother and a less than perfect parent
maybe if the courts began to look out for the interests of the child instead of the mother and placed the child with the parent that could best support it, cases like you mentioned wouldn't happen as often as you say they do.
115
posted on
08/17/2003 4:34:31 PM PDT
by
America's Resolve
("We have prepared for the unbelievers, whips and chains and blazing fires!" Koran 76:4)
To: Pukin Dog
I have a suggestion for you. Costa Rica. Don't they eventually take away the right to get a passport, or revoke it? (I know this is a federal function, but at least in my state you apply for the passport at the very same District Court that issues the divorce decrees!).
If this gentleman is telling us the whole story I do feel for him. It doesn't sound like he is trying to evade reasonable support obligations.
The south must be really tyranical on this sort of thing. Where I live up north, I do believe it is a rarity for anyone to pay alimony beyond the first payment or so. The state does look with contempt on those who evade child support obligations, but I don't know that I've ever heard of someone actually going to jail. Losing driving licenses and prefessional licenses is common for hardcore deadbeats, but the orders are modified due to changing circumstances all the time.
Incidentally, I am helping a relative with her pro se divorce papers. She has children, and the father has not paid prior obligations (too jerky to hold a job), but we aren't going to try and drive him to suicide; that wouldn't be right.
116
posted on
08/17/2003 4:34:34 PM PDT
by
steve86
To: ItisaReligionofPeace
I work in a field where I know a broad array of people in differening life circumstances. At last count over the past 10 years I have known 4 professional men to stop work completely and another 6 to downsize their work or change jobs to petition the courts for lower payments. I was amazed. I was amazed. Not much however, amazes me these days.
117
posted on
08/17/2003 4:35:39 PM PDT
by
mlmr
(Today is the first day of the rest of the pie.)
To: sweetjane
Some men get the raw end of the deal in divorce, but in most cases it's the women and children who get the raw end of the deal. Simple solution... the kids go with the one that makes the most money.
To: sweetjane
My oldest son DOES receive SSI! That still hasn't made a difference with the Judge!
To: bithey
No, his ex-wife is a woman with custody of children so she could get welfare. He cannot get welfare.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 701-703 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson