Judging by past experiences with AndrewC, either he believes that he can lawyer established physics into some trivial logical inconsistency that somehow escaped many of the greatest minds in the history of the human race, or he's playing the child's game of iteratively asking, "but why", heedless of the answers he may be given, in hope either of angering the other party, or eventually declaring victory as the last man standing.
At this point, I'm expecting you still to be pinging me to this thread in October. ;^)
If it isn't pulled in another hour!