"Who is he to decide what is right for civilization?" Mould asks. "Who is he to tell the world how we should perceive two people wanting equal protection under the already existing system?" Um, he would be the man elected President. The man who heads the Executive Branch of our constitutional form of government. It is his job to speak out on policy decisions. If the Congress is to pass a law, the President signs it or vetos it.
The issue is a desperate cry from a miniscule group of self-absorbed people. How does "same sex union" help America? Is there anything about a "same sex union" that cannot be handled with other contracts the couple could get a lawyer to draw up (regarding the division of property after the marriage disolves)?
Is it about recognition of the "marriage"? Recognized by whom? Employer? Many already give same sex couple who live together "spouse" benefits. Church? Neighbors? Taxman? Adoption agencies?
1 posted on
08/08/2003 5:39:59 PM PDT by
weegee
To: weegee
Who?
To: weegee
What is it with these libs? W was asked a question. He expressed his OPINION. He didn't pass a law for cripes sake!
3 posted on
08/08/2003 5:46:18 PM PDT by
Cobra64
(Babes should wear Bullet Bras - www.BulletBras.net)
To: weegee
Who in the hell is this Mold fellow?
4 posted on
08/08/2003 5:49:04 PM PDT by
cwb
To: weegee
Oh, on behalf of civilization, the question should be asked,
"What if everyone was gay?"
The world's civilizations would all end in one generation.
Must be a good thing.
To: weegee
...two people wanting equal protection under the already existing system?" Because, as someone else wiser than I pointed out already, "Marriage is not for the protection of those being married".
8 posted on
08/08/2003 5:58:25 PM PDT by
DuncanWaring
(...and Freedom tastes of Reality.)
To: weegee
When God announces Appendia A to the Bible, then I'nn consider Mr Mould's opinion as being valid. Until then, marriage is, and must remain valid only when between a NATURAL BORN man and a natural born woman...
10 posted on
08/08/2003 5:58:34 PM PDT by
m&maz
To: weegee
Man, it's hard to read crap like this. Husker Du is probably my all-time favorite band. This is why I stopped reading anything about the musicians I like, most of them are completely f'ed up people.
11 posted on
08/08/2003 6:08:44 PM PDT by
SoDak
To: weegee
"
If you take the religious argument out of the picture, you eliminate a lot of rhetoric that the right base their arguments on."So, if God arises and does to America what he did to Sodom and Gomorrah, does Mr. Mould think that he will be priveleged to just sit and observe from the safety of the sidelines?
God has a definite way of dealing with homosexuality and it ain't pretty. I, for one don't want our country to tempt Him in the matter.
To: weegee
Am not interested in reading the opinions of those who are in active rebellion against God (like that gay bishop and his supporters).
God is not mocked.
13 posted on
08/08/2003 6:36:57 PM PDT by
sauropod
(If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy.)
To: weegee
Errr yeah?! Who cares?!
18 posted on
08/08/2003 7:45:26 PM PDT by
Tempest
To: weegee
As a Husker (class of 1971, Wayne HS, Wayne, NE), who the @#$% is this loser???
22 posted on
08/08/2003 7:57:47 PM PDT by
Chairman Fred
(@mousiedung.commie)
To: weegee
President's comments draw ire from former Husker frontman He sounds more like a tight end or wide receiver to me.
23 posted on
08/08/2003 8:00:20 PM PDT by
Paleo Conservative
(Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
To: weegee
Thanks for the comments, Bob.
I'll be running your CD's down to DiscTrader tomorrow.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson