Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

man arrest for detaining illegal immigrants
Yuma Sun ^ | LOUIE VILLALOBOS, Staff Writer

Posted on 08/07/2003 8:27:02 PM PDT by AZ GRAMMY

Second arrest made in immigrant incident

BY LOUIE VILLALOBOS, Staff Writer Aug 7, 2003

Email this page Printer friendly page Subscribe to The Sun

Yuma County sheriff's deputies have arrested a second man in connection with the alleged unlawful detention of six illegal immigrants on July 31 in Gadsden.

Alexander David Dumas, 26, was arrested Tuesday evening after driving to Yuma from his home in Big Bear Lake, Calif., for an interview, said sheriff's spokesman Lt. Eben Bratcher.

Dumas was charged with six counts of aggravated assault and five counts of unlawful imprisonment following the early morning July 31 incident where deputies said he and Matthew Paul Hoffman, arrested on the same charges on Monday, detained a group of six illegal immigrants that had just entered the United States through the Colorado River.

A third man, Martin Hoffman Jr., was with the two suspects but won't be charged because he was not armed and did not take part in the handcuffing of the illegal immigrants, Bratcher said.

Bratcher said the department will continue to investigate the case and warned citizens against taking the law into their own hands.

He said anyone who sees a group of suspected illegal immigrants should call the Border Patrol, and not take it upon themselves to apprehend the group by using guns and handcuffs. Asking a group to stay put while making a phone call is permitted and would constitute a citizen's arrest, he said.

"When you have someone holding someone against their will with the use or the threat of the use of force, you've crossed the line between a citizen's arrest and unlawful detention," he said. "There was no justification for the use of force."

Deputies said the two men handcuffed five members of the group, which included three children and two women, and held them at gunpoint until U.S. Border Patrol agents arrived.

Agents have said they were dispatched to the scene when a surveillance camera operator noticed the incident unfolding. The agents called the sheriff's department, who then identified and interviewed all three men before letting them go, officials said.

Bratcher said the men are not believed to be part of a larger group, such as the citizen patrol groups that operate on private property along the Tucson border and use various forms of technology to alert Border Patrol agents to the presence of illegal immigrants in the area.

Also being charged with five counts of endangerment is a 16-year-old Mexican national who Bratcher said was paid $600 to bring the illegal immigrants into the United States. Bratcher also said the illegal immigrants were planning to meet with a taxi cab in Gadsden and were to be taken to a unidentified Yuma hotel, according to interviews done of the illegal immigrants by detectives.

William Robbins, Border Patrol spokesman, said the six illegal immigrants were in the agency's custody as of Wednesday morning but couldn't be interviewed.

Hugo Oliva, Mexican consul in Yuma, said the group was in good condition following the incident and that his office is encouraged by the sheriff's department's efforts regarding this case.

"This is a very disturbing thing to happen here," Oliva said. "We can't have people with guns do the job of law enforcement agencies."

http://yumasun.com/artman/publish/a...tory_6619.shtml


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: citizensarrest; crime; illegalimmigrants
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 601-614 next last
To: Cultural Jihad
A number of border crossers are hauling drugs, and armed. Better loaded for bear and encountering mice than the other way around. While being armed is prudent, threatening the unarmed unnecessarily is not.

However, if they were watched on camera, why weren't the feds there sooner???? Are they just getting paid to sit on their asses and watch TV?

Seems the Feds are more interested in busting Americans protecting their borders and property than in protecting the American borders. Or are they just interested in protecting their 'turf'?

221 posted on 08/07/2003 11:13:19 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mrustow
Veni, vidi, vici!
222 posted on 08/07/2003 11:13:24 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
You've got a lot of support out there.

And you have very little here. That's because you're wrong and being bitter about it.

223 posted on 08/07/2003 11:13:27 PM PDT by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
I believe they are interested in cutailing violence. Women and children having guns shoved into their faces is hardly a peaceful action.
224 posted on 08/07/2003 11:14:42 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
You forgot the third laugh. God laughs at those who think they know his will and that he will punish others at their request. He crys when he finds an ignorant person who convolutes his teachings and uses it to steal from others.

And I laugh at the extremism you spout on this post. But I've told you, here in the USA we believe you have the right to show your ignorance. So good luck and thanx for the laughs.

225 posted on 08/07/2003 11:14:50 PM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

If you read the article you would learn how to effect a valid, lawful, citizen's arrest.

226 posted on 08/07/2003 11:16:13 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: Tancredo Fan
I'm very sad to say it but, most people sucking at the teat of government are AMERICANS who get SS, unemployment, welfare, Medicare/Medicaid, grants, government home and business loans at ridiculous rates, etcetera etcetera ad nuseum. I don’t want to argue the relative advantages or disadvantages of these programs. I’m just making a point. Illegals get very little of this. One mexican hating Freeper shockingly told me Illegals cost Medicare $2 billion. I am shocked that Americans will pay $159 billion to the federal government and $71 billion dollars to the States this year for Medicaid alone. I’m really less worried about the $2 billion and more worried about the other $278 billion. Add in SS, unemployment, government grants, childcare tax credits, farm subsidies, etcetera…we are all getting a slice of everybody else’s tax dollars. Americans are a huge drain on our economy, and as history shows, illegals make for a great scapegoat in hard economic times. We have a $2.2 trillion federal budget, and a $10 trillion economy. $2 billion looks like a booger in comparison.

It's always interesting to meet up with some slave-driving exploiter of criminals every once in a while.

I like to think of my self as someone who has empathy for 2 moms and their children attempting to escape a life of poverty. I know you believe that Dubya, and myself are somehow making a buck off the illegal immigrants, but in fact, we just have hearts and souls. I will admit the Dubya may be thinking about the political consequences of gunning down Mexican families as they cross the border. I know if the TV stations air footage of that you will vote for Dubya but most humans will not.

Those impoverished Mexicans do the jobs Americans refuse to do like clean cars and toilets, all while smiling and happy for the chance to live in a country where their wife won't be raped and killed by a crooked cop. Pedro can’t speak English he isn’t asking for a government bailout of Chrysler. They aren’t taking my job and I don’t employ illegals. If you are a disaffected janitor you have my sympathies, but even if they do build a 20 foot steel fence around the "Land of the Free," Dubya is still not gonna force businesses to pay $15 an hour for grocery store baggers no matter how loudly you scream "Seig Heil!"

There were no INS agents at Plymouth Rock.

227 posted on 08/07/2003 11:16:33 PM PDT by Once-Ler (This Bushbot sez "I vote Dubya")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: PRND21
Oh relax, don't let it bother you too much that I don't ping all my buddies to fight my battles for me.
228 posted on 08/07/2003 11:17:24 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ("He's baaaaack!" Now is he on our side or the side of the (political bigger is better) machines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: mrustow
I've never heard an immigrant talk of coming to "the United States." It was always "America."

I'm not sure how many immigrants you speak with from Latin American countries. But having lived in South America, and having personally spoken with thousands of Mexicans, Central- and South-Americans, I can assure you that they DON'T refer to us as "America." We are "los Estados Unidos" to them, and we always will be. It's just the accepted norm in Spanish. And, they feel that everybody in this hemisphere is an American.

(That fine semantic point out of the way, they still don't have the right to cross our borders illegally.)

229 posted on 08/07/2003 11:20:28 PM PDT by Choose Ye This Day (http://thetaoofthedow.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
To: DoughtyOne

So no citizens are able to execute a citizens arrest without being charge with assault? That's an interesting point of view.

If you read the article you would learn how to effect a valid, lawful, citizen's arrest.

226 posted on 08/07/2003 11:16 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
 

Your suggestion is silly.  This group of illegal aliens appeared to be a group of men, women and children.  Another type of group could have just as easily come up that river bed.  You don't come unarmed to a possible drug trafficing encounter.  And you effect every arrest as if the people are a threat.  There's not a police officer around that won't tell you that you take each arrest as seriously as the worst type of arrest.

230 posted on 08/07/2003 11:22:37 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ("He's baaaaack!" Now is he on our side or the side of the (political bigger is better) machines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red
I don't object to what those guys did, but they got a bit carried away. The run of the mill border jumper will comply when confronted by an armed individual, the gun never needs to leave the holster, it is not necessary to handcuff them.
I have detained illegals, without drawing a gun as have several people I know, the illegals have always sat down and stayed when told to do so, and none of us have been arrested for detaining them.
231 posted on 08/07/2003 11:23:16 PM PDT by c-b 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: KEVLAR
Is a misdemeanor really all you are charged with for crossing the border illegally?

YES!

And it should be altered. This is the law back from when illegal aliens were not invading us in droves

232 posted on 08/07/2003 11:23:17 PM PDT by dennisw (G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Now I understand! They were not assaulted they were legally assaulted...oh well, then never mind. I got confused and mistook you for someone who was sane. sorry my mistake
233 posted on 08/07/2003 11:24:49 PM PDT by Once-Ler (This Bushbot sez "I vote Dubya")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red
I don't object to what those guys did, but they got a bit carried away. The run of the mill border jumper will comply when confronted by an armed individual, the gun never needs to leave the holster, it is not necessary to handcuff them.
I have detained illegals, without drawing a gun as have several people I know, the illegals have always sat down and stayed when told to do so, and none of us have been arrested for detaining them.
234 posted on 08/07/2003 11:24:57 PM PDT by c-b 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #235 Removed by Moderator

To: DoughtyOne
Oh relax, don't let it bother you too much that I don't ping all my buddies to fight my battles for me.

Nor did I...your "point" is meaningless.

236 posted on 08/07/2003 11:29:50 PM PDT by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Citizen arrests for misdemeanors must be witnessed, and even then the citizen must follow the other rules regarding making citizen's arrests. We don't want to commit felonies while griping about the misdemeanors of others.

237 posted on 08/07/2003 11:37:13 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
I suspect everybody you disagree with is a "leftist traitor" dennisw. That whole freedom of speech thing must really chafes your butt, huh? I bet you can't wait till a real principled conservative gets elected? One who ignores what the stupid people want, and he rules America with a iron fist. Only problem dennisw...you better hope that the dictator you desire doesn't ever give you cause to speak out against him...because he don't put up with that kind of thing. Now line up against the wall!

Some people are their own worst enemy.

238 posted on 08/07/2003 11:40:58 PM PDT by Once-Ler (This Bushbot sez "I vote Dubya")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Thanks for the tour of ideologue dementialand.
239 posted on 08/07/2003 11:41:28 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Once-Ler
To: DoughtyOne

Now I understand! They were not assaulted they were legally assaulted...oh well, then never mind. I got confused and mistook you for someone who was sane.
sorry my mistake

233 posted on 08/07/2003 11:24 PM PDT by Once-Ler (This Bushbot sez "I vote Dubya")
 

Most people think of a beating when they think of assault.  They picture some guy in a bar breaking a bottle over someone's head or a real brawl.  Or they think of a man who robs and beats up a victim. Or they think of some guy who just beats another person to a pulp.

These six men put handcuffs on the illegal aliens.  This is exactly what the INS would have done with them.  Would that have been assault?  Be reasonable.

You may not like it because ordinary citizens made an arrest here, detaining the illegal aliens, but I have seen no solid proof that anything they did was unquestionably wrong.

We have thousands of illegal aliens comming across our borders every day.  People who's farms and property are on the border are having a real problem with vandalism, thievery, dead pets, and destroyed property.  These men tried to take action to help discourage illegals from entering their area.  The INS isn't stopping it.  The local police aren't stopping it.  Our federal government isn't stopping it.

In certain areas, our citizens on the border have to put bars on their windows and lock themselves inside at night.  Essentially they are imprisoned in their own homes because our nation is being overrun with illegal aliens, and nobody will put an end to it.  That is my first concern.

Illegal aliens would not be subjected to any negative consequences if they didn't invade our nation.  That's the solution to them being submitted to citizen's arrest.  Preventing our citizens from executing a citizen's arrest serves no purpose other than to legitimize the seige mentality that our border citizens must live under.

Putting the handcuffs on has been charged as an assault.  The fact that guns were present brings the additional charge of aggravated.  This is clearly an abuse of power on behalf of the local authorities.

Why do I say this?  There have been literally thousands of illegals apprehended in that area over the last six months, and tehn turned over to the INS without a single arrest of the citizens who executed citizen's arrests in the same manner these men did.  Why weren't those aggravated assaults?

240 posted on 08/07/2003 11:42:22 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ("He's baaaaack!" Now is he on our side or the side of the (political bigger is better) machines.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 601-614 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson