Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rhema
Today, the Lutheran World Federation REJECTED a definition of marriage as between one man and one woman!

Oh well.

12 posted on 08/07/2003 6:42:09 PM PDT by realpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: realpatriot
Today, the Lutheran World Federation REJECTED a definition of marriage as between one man and one woman!

Wow --- it's really getting weird!

18 posted on 08/07/2003 7:07:23 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: realpatriot
Agghhh! You're kidding! No, probably not.

Where do we find out more about this?
21 posted on 08/07/2003 7:26:12 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: realpatriot
The Lutheran World Federation is so whacked out the mainline traditional Lutheran church in the US, the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod, does not belong to it. The Wisconsin Synod doesn't either, I believe.

The LCMS doesn't belong to the world Council of Churches either. My pastor referred to it as a communist front group, not a council of churches.

22 posted on 08/07/2003 7:28:32 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: realpatriot
Just to remind everyone again - the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod is one of the most conservative churches in America.

I can see them gaining members as refugees from the Episcopalians and ELCA start looking for a new church.
31 posted on 08/07/2003 7:50:11 PM PDT by horse_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: realpatriot
Today, the Lutheran World Federation REJECTED a definition of marriage as between one man and one woman!

Got link?

62 posted on 08/08/2003 5:26:06 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: realpatriot
Today, the Lutheran World Federation REJECTED a definition of marriage as between one man and one woman!

Do you have a link to that information? I looked, but couldn't find anything.

65 posted on 08/08/2003 6:17:31 AM PDT by Monitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: realpatriot
"Today, the Lutheran World Federation REJECTED a definition of marriage as between one man and one woman?" Didn't they finish their Assembly on July 31?

Here is the press release information:




The (Assembly) Message commits LWF members to remove barriers that exclude people from "participating fully in the life that God envisions for all." These barriers include gender, race, ethnicity, class, nationality, caste, sexual orientation, age and physical/mental condition. The Assembly also committed itself to supporting basic human rights for indigenous peoples. In reference to the visa issue, the Assembly singled out the Dalit people of India, who were among those denied entry to Canada.

The Message pledges members to enrich the church’s healing ministries by addressing HIV/AIDS, violence and poverty. "Diakonia," or the servant ministries of the church, are put forth as a fundamental dimension of the church’s life and part of its holistic healing ministry.
Justice and healing in families is addressed in the Assembly Message and provoked lively discussion on the floor of the Assembly on the language around issues of human sexuality and the definition of "family."

The Message encourages respectful dialogue on marriage, family and human sexuality "in a manner appropriate to the needs of each member church." It also addresses the experience of "spiritual poverty" within families and encourages resources for addressing these needs.




From: http://www.lwf-assembly.org/News-038-EN.html

The actual report is here (in pdf form): http://www.lwf-assembly.org/PDFs/LWF_Assembly_Message.pdf




Yes, it does look like their "path of pacifism" has put them at the top of the proverbial slippery slope.
71 posted on 08/08/2003 8:12:42 AM PDT by TaxRelief (Welcome to the #1 discussion board dedicated to the sustenance of a free republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson