Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Compares Bush to Nixon [actual title: Bush '04 Strategy More Nixon Than Reagan]
RushLimbaugh.com ^ | July 30, 2003 | Derek Taylor

Posted on 07/30/2003 5:18:48 PM PDT by derekftaylor

Edited on 07/30/2003 5:57:11 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-183 next last
To: swheats
I guess now that he's found FR there's never a moment without

Dream on ...

I will have to give FR the credit that it's due, however.

121 posted on 07/30/2003 9:16:15 PM PDT by _Jim (First INDICT the ham sandwhich ... the next step is to CONVICT it ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
Listen, you mysogenistic little twit, I don't have " selective hearing " nor an " inability to understand communications in a " man's world " ...nor no parrallel experiences to 'relate'to." As a matter of fact, Rush is the one who was SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO damned OUT OF IT , re relating to Manhattan, or even to much of anyother place, in '89 and forwards, that he was ( probably still is ! ) completely incapable of dealing with Manhattan; let alone living a " normal " life. Now, that he's married to a social climber, he gets out and trades on that. I'm NOT impressed ; are you ?

Anyone, with even the tiniest of sophistication and political accumen, sees Rush for what and who he has turned into. Obviously, you are the one who lacks the abilities of undersatnding, has slective hearing, and doesn't know that " a man's world " is no longer what it once was, pet. Heck,in the sense you appear to mean, I'm more of a " man ", than you'll ever be, pet. ;^)

Maybe YOU should consider that YOU are missing far more than you know. Rush has changed and changed mightily. He didn't used to try to pronouce "issue " with a badly done, prissy English accent ALL of the time, he didn't waste most of the day on things like toe fungus, his golf game, nor where and what he ate. He was funny, he was an unsophisticate ( and proud of it...which was also stupid, but not nearly as bad as the reverse!), and I doubt that you've listened to tapes of his shows, from the early years.

I haven't changed at all; Rush has. And, BTW, my husband stopped listening to him FIRST...and he is the one who got me hooked on Rush to begin with. Rush turned him off, most of our friends and family members off and I am the LAST person to have stopped listening to him altogether.

Ever think, dear, that it is YOU, who is off base ? LOL

122 posted on 07/30/2003 9:18:13 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: swheats
Thats another one I won't watch.
123 posted on 07/30/2003 9:18:19 PM PDT by Mike the lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Scott from the Left Coast
Well, assuming there are 51% that are "freedom loving".

Most likely there aren't 51% that are freedom-loving, but there are 51% that are most freedom-loving.

But beyond the witicism [at least I think it's a witicism...could be the truth, I suppose] that's a hard call when you are running an election. When you run an election you have to go for every single vote that it's possible to get. Elections are too amorphous to control that expertly...expertly enough to know that you are getting just the 51% and that it's only the "right" people voting for you. You've got to go all out to get as many votes as you can...because in an election you control very little of what is happening out in the voting society.

Yes, you give the point of view of somebody who is "running an election". The point of view I gave was of one who is most freedom-loving.

BTW, I thought Bush's 2000 campaign was prefect. He won -- generally speaking -- with 49% of the vote that was most freedom-loving.

124 posted on 07/30/2003 9:18:47 PM PDT by FreeReign (V5.0 Enterprise Edition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Consort
Yes, exactly the same way and for far less reason.
125 posted on 07/30/2003 9:19:03 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Mike the lurker
he will do what it takes, to make that happen, & he will blow with the wind to keep those radio dials from turning.

Yeah, right.

An assertion without support (a cite), without basis AND without supporting 'history'.

CALL him any open-line Friday and CHALLENGE him on that.

YOU WILL get to the head of the line ...

(Entertaining he does have to be - 'blowing in the wind' without a philosophical anchor/an ideology he does not.)

126 posted on 07/30/2003 9:20:22 PM PDT by _Jim (First INDICT the ham sandwhich ... the next step is to CONVICT it ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
Talk about " SELECTIVE HEARING "; NOT TO MENTION LOSS OF MEMORY, DEAR. iT WAS three WHOLE DAYS, WITH COMMERCIAL BREAKS AND THE USUAL : " I HAVE SO MUCH ON MY PLATE, I DON'T KNOW WHERE TO BEGIN " crapola...which he NEVER got to.

You're eyes must be brown .... fill in the rest. Barbra Stiesand thrower.

127 posted on 07/30/2003 9:21:50 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Ever think, dear, that it is YOU, who is off base ?

NOT when I have a chance to listen to those TAPES from the early 90's deary and compare the El Rushbo of then to now ...

Game - set - match.

(The 'woman' is never wrong - ha!)

128 posted on 07/30/2003 9:22:40 PM PDT by _Jim (First INDICT the ham sandwhich ... the next step is to CONVICT it ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
YOU'D better check on WHAT he's saying now about Hilliary!

Why would you assume that I don't know what Rush is saying about Hillary running in 2004 -- now?

(*It's obvious that you read more into what I just said.*)

I'll say it again;

Rush made outright statements about Hillary not running, both for the senate 3 years ago and very recently and about 2004.

That's all I said.

129 posted on 07/30/2003 9:24:11 PM PDT by FreeReign (V5.0 Enterprise Edition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
LOL! Too many perfect elections like that and we'll have a bunch of winners dead from heart attacks (not to mention the toll on supporters)!
130 posted on 07/30/2003 9:24:39 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
Alex Jones staged much of those films, which he sell to cretins.

Some people, here, have tried and tried to claim that he knows what he's talking about and quote him.He is a loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong ago discredited source!

I post the facts, so that people reading this thread won't swallow, as whole cloth, tinfoil garbage. I don't have to tell/convince Jones of anything. He's a manipulator, a charlatan, and a liar, who is making money from a scam.

131 posted on 07/30/2003 9:25:05 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
You wouldn't have to be Rush would you? You having archived tapes of past shows, and the defense you're giving on his behalf causes me to ask.
132 posted on 07/30/2003 9:25:25 PM PDT by swheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
iT WAS three WHOLE DAYS,

THAT'S your claim. A claim made my a human being with faults, biases, a fading memory and memories colored (now and then) by emotion.

Do you THINK we can take what you say as ABSOLUTELY FACTUAL when there are records of that era that need only be searched for said 'three days worth' of toe fungus comments?

Not on your life ...

133 posted on 07/30/2003 9:27:13 PM PDT by _Jim (First INDICT the ham sandwhich ... the next step is to CONVICT it ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: swheats
Rush was using FR, from almost the very beginnings of this site, as his research mill. He even quoted many posts and NEVER gave us ant credit at all. Then, he turned against FR and FREEPERS. He still uses us, though.

Marrying Marta changed him the most. His hearing changed him somewhat; both the losing of and getting back.

134 posted on 07/30/2003 9:27:22 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Mike the lurker
I'm heading in that direction. I can't believe he actually spoke defending the all gay school today.

135 posted on 07/30/2003 9:27:51 PM PDT by swheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Alex Jones staged much of those films, which he sell to cretins.

I wouldn't doubt it -

- Alex is in it *only* for Alex ...

136 posted on 07/30/2003 9:28:33 PM PDT by _Jim (First INDICT the ham sandwhich ... the next step is to CONVICT it ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Well Sevrin has called for the "nuking" of Baghdad if our troop casualties get to high and calls all those who oppose the war in Iraq "commies" and "traitors" and then in the next breath says that we should pull out of Iraq because it is none of our business. Very schitzoid. Oh- and he has two dogs now and spends a lot of time bragging about how he gets a lot of chicks and once bragged about how he had slept with two women at once. Real secure guy.

But he did have a great show when Hillary's book came out and he played hillary doing her book on tape. His commentary was hilarious.

137 posted on 07/30/2003 9:31:14 PM PDT by Burkeman1 (If you see ten troubles comin down the road, Nine will run into the ditch before they reach you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
Icksnay onway ethay ohemianbay ovegray
138 posted on 07/30/2003 9:31:15 PM PDT by nunya bidness (sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Consort
I was replying to your comment about ABC hireing Rush just to fire him.

I do not think Rush will let that happen, he did not get a 225 million plus contract because he was late to the party!!

139 posted on 07/30/2003 9:31:22 PM PDT by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
Well, THIS woman is almost NEVER wrong. Case closed.

Hate your mother, have a messy divorce/shrew for a wife, do do ? What's YOUR obvious problem with women caused by ?

I could probably give you the dates of those three days, but, I doubt that you're man enough to tell the truth, if you even bothered to listen to those tapes.

And, psuedo man, get over yourself, grow up, and at least try to be civil. Little boys ... sheeeeeeeeeeeeeesh !

140 posted on 07/30/2003 9:31:33 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson